- Joined
- Sep 28, 2007
- Messages
- 10
- Reaction score
- 0
thanks for your generous comments🙂

It was a thanks in advance sort of thing. There have been no comments (except yours and mine)where is the comment? thanks.
A few earlier posts discussed about this program.thanks for your generous comments🙂![]()
neuropath fellowship of MDA shares the same PD with methodistHad a friend do the Methodist HemePath fellowship. Kind of a sleepy year for him - he liked the teaching staff. He got a good private gig. MDA across the street from Methodist is a more demanding fellowship program (Heme, surg, etc), as in demanding more papers, more presentations, more research, more life energy. Methodist pays better for the fellowship year.
Had a friend do the Methodist HemePath fellowship. Kind of a sleepy year for him - he liked the teaching staff. He got a good private gig. MDA across the street from Methodist is a more demanding fellowship program (Heme, surg, etc), as in demanding more papers, more presentations, more research, more life energy. Methodist pays better for the fellowship year.
The problem with a hemepath fellowship at a place like MDA is that you don't see any initial case presentations. Most everything that comes through the door has a prior workup. That's great if you want to stay in a quarternary uber-referral center, but if you're heading into a private job it's not ideal. That said, they see some craaaaaaaazy stuff there... and they have some excellent staff.
Very interesting point about Academic/referral pathology in general.
Certainly being purely at a large referral center is bad, but being purely at a community hospital is also suboptimal. The way to deal with this is to set up cases at big academic centers as unknowns to trainees. Not here and there, but regular and intense unknown slide sets with case histories are the way to do this. If I had a program I would have a once a week, unknown slide set that was both mandatory and graded. Fail 2 slide sets and you are gone. That simple.
Programs need to get away from using pathology residents as slave labor and actually...crazy...TEACH the material.
I know, too idealistic I suppose.
Agree with the unknowns, but I'm not sure how you coud "grade" someone who has been in AP for like two months and if they don't know the answer to an unknown of some ridiculously esoteric process (maybe the reason why it was a consult to begin with?), send them packing.
Very interesting point about Academic/referral pathology in general.
Certainly being purely at a large referral center is bad, but being purely at a community hospital is also suboptimal. The way to deal with this is to set up cases at big academic centers as unknowns to trainees. Not here and there, but regular and intense unknown slide sets with case histories are the way to do this. If I had a program I would have a once a week, unknown slide set that was both mandatory and graded. Fail 2 slide sets and you are gone. That simple.
Programs need to get away from using pathology residents as slave labor and actually...crazy...TEACH the material.
I know, too idealistic I suppose.
Do they have IMGs? Do they offer pre-match? Thanks for any info.
From the Methodist literature I received:
SELECTION OF LEVEL 1 RESIDENTS
1. The criteria for Level I residents are as follows:
a. Must meet all general requirements, e.g., visa requirements, graduation from medical school before entering residency, etc.
b. Minimum score of 80th percentile on both USMLE Steps I and II.
c. At least a B average in medical school without any failing grades or Ds.
Preference is given to those in top quarter of medical school class.
d. Graduates of medical schools outside the United States and Canada must have a valid ECFMG certificate and one of the following:
i. Have a full and unrestricted license to practice medicine in a US licensing jurisdiction
ii. Have at least one year of medical or scientific experience in the United States or Canada; preference will be given to those who will have completed Ph.D. work by the time they enter residency.
e. Graduates of colleges of osteopathic medicine in the United States must be from institutions accredited by the American Osteopathic Association.
f. Preference is given to AOA nominees, those completing MD/PhD work, or those who have excelled in medical school.
g. The applicants are interviewed by the Residency Committee and selected other faculty, all of whom have input into the selection process.
h. The Residency Committee, which is composed of the residency program director, associate residency program director, faculty representatives of the hospital, and the Chief Resident, prepares the final ranking of the applicants.
All PGY1 spots are filled through the match (unless they don't fill) and theoretically they take IMGs provided you meet the above legal and academic criteria.
Thanks. Have you been to their interview yet? Do they currently have any IMGs? I did not find any resident profile on their website.
It seems many AMGs are interested in their program, which makes me feel unconfident and want to find out. The MATCH is too unpredictable for IMGs.
I had my interview today. I believe there are IMGs, but it seems to be getting much more competitive as the program is beginning to develop some national recognition. According to my interviewers, they nearly doubled their number of applications this year. They plan on giving out ~50 interviews total for their 5 spots. They said the quality of applicants this year is also significantly improved. They are trying to recruit some MD/PhDs hard core because they are building a new research center.
If you have a strong application I say go for it.
Thanks a lot for your update. I do have a US PhD and decent publications. Well, I'll just do my best.
Be confident. Even though you're an IMG, you've got the PhD and if you have research interest, they seem really interested in promoting that in their residents, so you may do well...
BH