-
CycleTrack and SDN are teaming up to make medical school admissions more transparent and accessible! Read the announcement to learn how we’re supporting the future of CycleTrack’s free application-tracking tools .
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
RFA doesn't last
Started by oneforfighting
Get help with your application
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
haven't done them. no spondylolisthesis seen on plain films, so wasn't concerned for it.F/E films?
I’m curious what are you offering for discogenic pain?1) Any Modic changes on MRI? If so, can be good candidate for possible Intracept.
2) How are the discs? Consider discogenic causes?
3) Re-evaluate. Pain is in same area or elsewhere? Could try therapeutic Facet Block if there's significant fluid in that joint still.
it hasnt been mentioned before, but there will be a percentage of people that will fail even the best placed RFA. 15%?
but if your repeat RFA is not lasting at least 3 months, you might have to rethink your diagnosis
unless it is a comp patient...
but if your repeat RFA is not lasting at least 3 months, you might have to rethink your diagnosis
unless it is a comp patient...
I’m curious what are you offering for discogenic pain?
I don't know the story of this patient or seen the MRIs. Just thinking of other options outside of surgery if that's not what they want. Re-evaluate, and if Modic Changes, Intracept. If there's degeneration of the disc, can think about Via Disc. Anything else, re-evaluate.
Why are people touting via disc? Isn’t it kinda ridiculous that people will do this because the fda “backs it” but people have an aneurysm over intradiscal PRP..no industry backing?I don't know the story of this patient or seen the MRIs. Just thinking of other options outside of surgery if that's not what they want. Re-evaluate, and if Modic Changes, Intracept. If there's degeneration of the disc, can think about Via Disc. Anything else, re-evaluate.
I see what you’re saying. For me personally the PRP is too variable whereas the ViaDisc is more standardized. In addition the latter has more data. And finally the former isn’t covered by insurance. I don’t do either but those are my general thoughts.Why are people touting via disc? Isn’t it kinda ridiculous that people will do this because the fda “backs it” but people have an aneurysm over intradiscal PRP..no industry backing?