- Joined
- Sep 7, 2013
- Messages
- 804
- Reaction score
- 173
- Points
- 5,246
- Location
- somewhere down south
- Pre-Medical

That number is from the MSAR I believe, which reports the average MCAT for accepted applicants. Therefore, you will have numerous high MCAT people getting accepted at multiple institutions. Since these scores are reported multiple times they inflate the medians. I have no doubt that the average matriculant MCAT has risen, but its probably not up to 33.In pre-allo, it's been mentioned that the new median MCAT this year has risen to a 33 (unbelievable)
Do you believe that we will see a comparable MCAT jump (to 29) for osteopathic schools once the new data comes out?
I doubt it. The average matriculate student for MD still likely has around a 30.1 mcat with the average accepted still being around a 32.
That being said, I won't be surprised if it did go put a 33 for average accepted student. And I won't be surprised if next year DMU, PCOM, NSU, LECOM-B will post a 29 average mcat and I won't be surprised if CCOM, Touro-CA, Touro-NY, and Western post a 31.
Reality is that with every year as the MD match gets more and more competitive more and more traditionally pre-allo students wash into pre-osteo land and they get in. This wash in will only increase and with it average applicant stats and accepted averages.
How can average matriculant average be 30.1 while accepted be 32? Are people not taking their acceptances?! That's absurd.
iirc The median MD matriculant has been at 32 for a few years now1 person applied with a 35. Gets accepted to four places.
1 personal applies with a 30. Gets one acceptance.
35+35+35+35+30 all over 5 = 34 accepted student average.
35+30 = 32.5 matriculate average
iirc The median MD matriculant has been at 32 for a few years now
Are you sure this is how they play with the statistics? I was under the impression the calculation was done after May when you can hold only one acceptance.That's an accepted student stat. Matriculate was always lower in the 30s.
Are you sure this is how they play with the statistics? I was under the impression the calculation was done after May when you can hold only one acceptance.
In pre-allo, it's been mentioned that the new median MCAT this year has risen to a 33 (unbelievable)
Do you believe that we will see a comparable MCAT jump (to 29) for osteopathic schools once the new data comes out?
Are you sure this is how they play with the statistics? I was under the impression the calculation was done after May when you can hold only one acceptance.
In pre-allo, it's been mentioned that the new median MCAT this year has risen to a 33 (unbelievable)
Do you believe that we will see a comparable MCAT jump (to 29) for osteopathic schools once the new data comes out?
Maybe, but then again the scoring system is changing as well. I am not surprised that MCATs are rising, since more people are applying to schools. Also many students take MCAT tutoring courses as well. The increase is particularly noticeable over the past 6 years since the economy has not been the best.
I didnt even use it and I am aware of how the scores started to skyrocket after people started using it. Before that time there was no seriously organized study method.People have been taking Kaplan for years. Someone gave me their prep materials from the late 90's and it was the same exact thing I had in 2009. The cover was different and there were a few more illustrations but the content was the same.
I think the biggest change was people finding out about TBR for PS sections and EK for VR. Honestly 1 passage was almost exactly the same on my test. It had the same picture and everything. I went into robot mode when I saw it.
That SN2 study schedule was a game changer.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I didnt even use it and I am aware of how the scores started to skyrocket after people started using it. Before that time there was no seriously organized study method.
I didnt even use it and I am aware of how the scores started to skyrocket after people started using it. Before that time there was no seriously organized study method.
Omg Kaplan IS the worst. Didn't help with my SATs. I decided to give it a second chance on my MCATs... Big fail.Well, you know, besides Kaplan and TPR.
I think the biggest problem with Kaplan was that they never adapted their methods. It was the same archaic method for 10+ years.
NO ONE liked their VR strategies. The PS materials were mediocre at best.
People have been taking Kaplan for years. Someone gave me their prep materials from the late 90's and it was the same exact thing I had in 2009. The cover was different and there were a few more illustrations but the content was the same.
I think the biggest change was people finding out about TBR for PS sections and EK for VR. Honestly 1 passage was almost exactly the same on my test. It had the same picture and everything. I went into robot mode when I saw it.
That SN2 study schedule was a game changer.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Honestly and I've been saying this for a long time. Kaplan is awful and a waste of your money.
TBR is the best but keeping your a attention and dedication to the material may be difficult.
TPR is the best middle ground you'll get.
I agree with this statement big time. I felt like I got scammed. I went from a mere 23 to a barely 25-26. By myself, I was able to improve to a 27-29. I'm taking a local tutor back home this summer who has gotten 3 of my friends 33-37s (two of them that were below average students in college ~3.0 gpas at top 50 universities)
So... Does this tutor have a clone anywhere around where I live? Haha
People have been taking Kaplan for years. Someone gave me their prep materials from the late 90's and it was the same exact thing I had in 2009. The cover was different and there were a few more illustrations but the content was the same.
I think the biggest change was people finding out about TBR for PS sections and EK for VR. Honestly 1 passage was almost exactly the same on my test. It had the same picture and everything. I went into robot mode when I saw it.
That SN2 study schedule was a game changer.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yeah it's getting crazy with how the MCAT percentile average keeps rising and rising. Next thing you know, if you don't have a 30 on the MCAT, you are at a disadvantage for DO schools; i don't know how far away we are from that situation, but it seems close approaching
I really don't think so... People with 3.3 GPA and 26 MCAT will apply to these schools as back up... I got an LOR from a DO who got into a top DO with an 18 MCAT, and now 25 MCAT is not even considered competitive...As User3 says, as long as new schools open up in random backwoods there will still be options for lower spectrum applicants.
I really don't think so... People with 3.3 GPA and 26 MCAT will apply to these schools as back up... I got an LOR from a DO who got into a top DO with an 18 MCAT, and now 25 MCAT is not even considered competitive...
1 person applied with a 35. Gets accepted to four places.
1 personal applies with a 30. Gets one acceptance.
35+35+35+35+30 all over 5 = 34 accepted student average.
35+30 = 32.5 matriculate average
Yeah it's getting crazy with how the MCAT percentile average keeps rising and rising. Next thing you know, if you don't have a 30 on the MCAT, you are at a disadvantage for DO schools; i don't know how far away we are from that situation, but it seems close approaching
i know MSUCOM is at 29 right now , was sitting at 31 for large portions of the processI doubt it. The average matriculate student for MD still likely has around a 30.1 mcat with the average accepted still being around a 32.
That being said, I won't be surprised if it did go put a 33 for average accepted student. And I won't be surprised if next year DMU, PCOM, NSU, LECOM-B will post a 29 average mcat and I won't be surprised if CCOM, Touro-CA, Touro-NY, and Western post a 31.
Reality is that with every year as the MD match gets more and more competitive more and more traditionally pre-allo students wash into pre-osteo land and they get in. This wash in will only increase and with it average applicant stats and accepted averages.
I think it's the same dichotomy of a MS-4 wanting there to be more Derm residencies and then when he matches for their to be none. We all want what is best for us, it's evolutionarily encoded.
i know MSUCOM is at 29 right now , was sitting at 31 for large portions of the process
I think the bad economy has also played a roll in the more competitive stats, more students are going to graduate school since the recession started in 2008.
unlikely to stay this high after waitlist movement
It seems more intuitive that less students would go to graduate school because of the insane cost. Better to keep your $50k/yr job than shell out $50k+ to go to med school. Most 20-somethings don't have the foresight to realize more school probably leads to more pay down the road.
I disagree with that statement. I even looked at my school, and the trends have been more students going to graduate school than to the work force, the difference is particularly noticeable since 2008. Most people in college are under the assumption that more education means more opportunity.
And it is generally true in non-saturated fields like medicine. Given the stagnant(or slowly growing) number of positions its only natural that the competition will be more fierce with a larger sample size. Lets assume that in 2000 there were 5000 students taking the MCAT and 500 medical school seats. Now assume that in 2013 10000 students took the MCAT yet there are only 600 medical school seats. Since the MCAT is graded on a standard distribution curve then there will be more applicants with higher MCATS despite their relative proportion remaining the same. If med school seats grew at the same rate as applicants then you would probably see no shift in the avrg accepted mcat.
I used Kaplan for my board review in my current profession and they were crap. I might as well have burned that money for all the good it did me. Decided to go it alone on the MCAT with TBR and EK, and ended up doing very well. Kaplan is garbage.Omg Kaplan IS the worst. Didn't help with my SATs. I decided to give it a second chance on my MCATs... Big fail.
Thank god I smartened up and used TBR & PR .
I used TBR and TPR for MCAT. And skimmed the EK books. It did wonders! Kaplan is a hot messI used Kaplan for my board review in my current profession and they were crap. I might as well have burned that money for all the good it did me. Decided to go it alone on the MCAT with TBR and EK, and ended up doing very well. Kaplan is garbage.
Same here, I used TBR, ExamKrakers, wikipremed and a bit of PR. Did all official FL's plus the online gold standard ones.I did decent on the MCAT, nothing stellar, but feel I was prepared to get a higher score on PS, as judged by my past FL performance. Time kinda messed me up there. I got lucky on my BS b/c I knew VERY little orgo and had 2 passages of it. However, during all my FLs I was good all along on VR (think 10+) and on the real thing I got choked and scored only a 7. Managed a 29 total (11/7/11).
I also had ALL the kaplan materials...never liked them and never used them
Man that Section is so deceiving. I did have some timing issues, but after I finished it I thought I had done a very good job 😀.....Wow, if you had hit your verbal average, your mcat score would have been drastically different. Verbal was the bane of my existence so I sympathize
Yea it is so goofy. I remember walking out feeling like I completely bombed the PS section and Killed (I mean DESTROYED) the verbal section. I got my average on PS and one point lower on the verbal than my averages (I got a 10 or 11 on every single AAMC). The MCAT is a tricky beast...Man that Section is so deceiving. I did have some timing issues, but after I finished it I thought I had done a very good job 😀.....