Rite Aid work flow 6 baskets?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

newlearner2014

Full Member
7+ Year Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2014
Messages
15
Reaction score
6
Points
4,601
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Hi all, I am new floater for Rite Aid and I have seen conflicting work flows at different places. My most current confusion is about the 6 basket practices I have seen at different pharmacies.

The reason I ask for confirmation from collective genius, you, is because I was explained differently by different pharmacy managers.
Allow me to present the case:

If the pharmacy has 1 technician and 1 pharmacist, I was told:
Pharmacist is main cashier until technician has 6 baskets with medications and labels and then either:
technician counts until pharmacist is done with register, then pharmacist counts and finalizes scripts,
or
technician takes over counter so pharmacist can count and finalize scripts.

Technician is main receiver of drop off area and production area (getting med from shelf and make label).

The reason I ask for confirmation is because I see different practices out there:
Some pharmacies have seasoned technician who makes over 15 baskets and counts and then works on other things while pharmacist got stuck at counter with endless waves of pickups and then technician complains that the pharmacist is slow causing labels to exist for more than 15 minutes and label entries are red in computer.

The reason the labels existed more than 15 minutes was because the technician made over 6 baskets and did not walk over and help at register.
My Action Plan is: After I see 6 to 10 baskets, I am going to ask the technician to help at register.
I focus on finalizing script.
During the time the tech is stuck at register, I help with receiving script at drop off and putting phone on hold, then go back to finalize script until 6 baskets gone.
When 6 baskets are gone, then I help with at register so tech can make new labels and answer phone.
Is this plan reasonable?

One manager insists that during time of 1 pharmacist and 1 tech, then, 1 pharmacist must: count, finalize script and ring up. Tech must: take script, type, pull med, make label, answer phone. No crossing duties.

Another manger allows crossing duties as coworkers should help each other when one coworker is stuck.
I saw briefly a Work Flow Procedure chart from one manager but the explanation was not there, just a brief outline and interpretation is subjective on managers.

As a floater, I am confused. Which manager is correct? Perhaps one manager misunderstood the policy? Above level of pharmacy manager, does Rite Aid's policy allows crossing duties to help each others?

I promised to "DO NOT HARM" and I am working very hard to keep that promise and I don't want to be labeled wrongly as a slow floater because some technician did not know company's policy on flow and caused 15 baskets to sit on counter and did not relieve pharmacist from register.
Thank you very much for your help. What would you do?
 
Last edited:
Unfortunately, as a new floater, you have no say on the work flow. Each store is different... There really is no standard procedure, because rite aid is just starting to get their sh@t together. Also, a good tech will make your job a lot easier, doesn't matter what work flow u follow.

Just tell the tech to not print labels if you are behind and put on longer wait time so the RX don't go red.

Your life will also become easier once you learn all the shortcuts
 
Where r u located btw?
 
This post makes me anxious.
 
I agree with the person who says that a good tech will make your life easier regardless of workflow. I have worked with pharmacists and interns who are fanatical that techs must follow a prescribed workflow without deviation. Frankly I find it offputing and unnecessary. Who cares who does what? As long as everyone is pitching in it will all get done and without the headache of trying to control everyone all day long. Just my opinion.
 
I agree with the person who says that a good tech will make your life easier regardless of workflow. I have worked with pharmacists and interns who are fanatical that techs must follow a prescribed workflow without deviation. Frankly I find it offputing and unnecessary. Who cares who does what? As long as everyone is pitching in it will all get done and without the headache of trying to control everyone all day long. Just my opinion.
As a tech/intern, I hated stores who had those hard and fast rules about who does what. Pharmacists that refuse to ring the register, tech who won't answer the phone because they're counting, etc. When I pick up extra shifts I'll occasionally run into techs at other stores who get mad when I'm inputting/counting, because that's their job. If I'm not verifying anything at the moment, on the phone, at the counter, why would I just stand there and wait? Obviously I'm going to move onto the next task that needs to be done.
 
Do what needs to be done...? Is that a hard concept? Someone comes up to the counter, whoever isn't busy should get it. If you get a line ask for help. Work flow is stupid and should only be followed by people who can't do their jobs well...
 
Where r u located btw?

Thank you everyone for your input and sharing your thoughts. I work in California.

At slower store, I have been trained to help in all departments and jump at any and every chances to help my teammates.

At high volume store, they told me to know the work flow and stick to work flow because if I jump everywhere and help at everything, I won't have enough time to finalize script. I have to delegate at high volume store.

In this case at high volume store, I will have to delegate then.

As presented earlier, my Action Plan is to ask the tech to make only 6 baskets and then I will focus on finishing baskets and meanwhile tech will take care of drop off or counter until baskets are done then I will take care of counter.

Please share your wise thoughts if my Action Plan may cause trouble (or conflict with company's policy). Thank you in advance.
 
Do whatever works for you to be an efficient pharmacist. Fu3k Action Plan/Company policy -> only follow this when your boss (district supervisor) is around.
 
Someone comes up to the counter, whoever isn't busy should get it.
I agree. I used to do that when I was technician. Supporting my teammates until I drop. I tried focusing on finalizing script and see what would happen, this tech just did not come over to get counter.


If you get a line ask for help.
When my teammates asked for help, I jump right away. For this tech, I asked and tech replied that there are always work on receiving side to be done.
Phone rings and tech just walked away from phone to go get medications for non-rush order.

For tech that are strange like this and seemingly lazy, I plan to pull out company's work flow and gently go over with this tech. I just want to confirm with you all before I carry out my Action Plan because I don't want to cross line with manager.
 
I work at a slower store and don't follow that. I do everything including typing and ringing to help out. I also work alone on Sundays.

Sent from my HTC6525LVW using Tapatalk
 
I work at a slower store and don't follow that. I do everything including typing and ringing to help out. I also work alone on Sundays.

Sent from my HTC6525LVW using Tapatalk

Agree totally, I do the same when I work a slow store with 4 hours of tech help.
 
Top Bottom