The infamous breakdown, here it goes...
BIO 19 (83.5)
GC 21 (91.6)
OC 20 (84.4)
PAT 20 (81.0)
RC 21 (88.9)
QR 21 (97.6)
AA 20 (93.4)
TS 20 (91.3)
Biology
Study Materials: Barron's AP, Kaplan, DAT Destroyer
I took the Kaplan class and utilized all their materials, and overall it was ok. The in-class stuff was pretty good because of the detail involved; it really fostered understanding. Kaplan's class + books + online resources + other materials (flashcards and quicksheets) all together covered basically everthing. However, if you choose to take Kaplan, couple it with an AP like Barron's or Cliff's. (I read Cliff's while taking the bio sequence and it was just too dry for me; Barron's is an uber-easy read and more entertaining than Cliff's in my opinion).
Real DAT: Yeah, it's random, but then again bio in general is "random." There's so many different subjects in biology that, in order to really test student's knowledge in biology it must be widespread questions. However, I got some weird questions--it was the format that was strange. There were a quite a few questions where the diagrams were soo confusing. I felt pretty good about bio, but the very first question had a diagram that I was like wtf? Mark, choose an answer, move on. Still don't get what they were asking in that question, and don't care 😎. Nothing specific from Destroyer, like I've been reading other ppl say, but reading the solutions in Destroyer is great review to solidify.
General Chemistry
Study Materials: Chad!, DAT Destroyer, Kaplan, Princeton AP Chem
I specifically wanted to do well in this section, so I started reviewing in May for this using the AP Chem. It was easy to understand, and with that being the only studying of gen chem I had done in years, gen chem turned out to be my highest score on the Kaplan Diagnostic Test. I only got through ~1/2 of it though--moved on to Kaplan. Kaplan was meh. Chad is amazing. Hands down. I know, I know, everyone says the same thing. Becaue of Chad, a part of me wishes I wouldn't have taken the Kaplan class, and just focused on Chad. However, I needed the structure of going to class and being responsible to get "homework" done. I bought Chad's videos exactly 1 month before my DAT and got through everything once, my weaknesses 2x. If you have the time, buy 2-3 months and go over the videos 2x and you'll be more than set.
Real DAT: Pretty straight forward, actually. Got a couple weird ones, but majority of it is basic. Not much calculation, just setting up mostly.
Organic Chemistry
Study Materials: Chad!, DAT Destroyer, Kaplan
This was the subject I studied the least for (besides RC). Went through Chads, which was most helpful in refreshing my memory. I like ochem to begin with, I'm good at guessing on most rxns, so I focused on the other subjects more and ochem last.
Real DAT: Basic stuff, not too many surprises thankfully. Finished with about 10 minutues to go over a few. It is key to get your timing/pace down!
Perceptual Ability
Study Materials: CDP
Practice makes perfect. I felt fine with PAT to begin with, so once I did a couple CDP tests, I focused on other material. However, the week of my test I did a CDP test every day, just to keep my brain in PAT mode.
Real DAT: I did not appreciate it, to be honest. Keyholes were o.k., a couple questionable ones. I was still a bit stirred up from the sciences, so I was taking a lot longer to answer than usual. TFE was alright. I've been hearing that the 'counting events' method doesn't work on the real thing, so for the last week I've been just trying to visualize the object on CDP, and I recommend that to those who have yet to take it. They weren't too crazy of objects, but counting only worked on 1 or 2. Angles were alright, but use CDP for this, as Kaplan's angles are far too easy. Hole punch: this made me angry! The holes were almost 1/2 the size of the ones seen in Kaplan or Achiever. Their folds were NOT symmetrical--nothing I've seen before, very sloppy. Cubes: probably got at least 5-7 different stacks, was flustered b/c of holes so I tried to race through this to save time. Pattern folding: not bad, but I've felt pretty good about patterns to begin with. Finished with only 1 or 2 minutes, but was ready for break.
Reading Comprehension
Study Materials: Kaplan practice tests, Achiever practice tests
Not much studying--just find what works for you and go for it. I like to read JAMA and JADA, so I was somewhat used to articles like this. Reading those journals helps. Although there are many words in JAMA & JADA articles I do not know, I read them because I will know what those words mean in the future. I have a legitimate motivation and interest in health sciences articles and I think it helps for RC. Be engaged in the article you are reading and you will retain more, and if you do not remember something you will remember where to find it.
Real DAT: As I did on practice tests, I just read the article. I jotted down a couple notes, but didn't use them. As long as you get your timing down and stay focused, it's not too bad of a section. I finished a few minutes early.
Quantitative Reasoning
Study Materials: Math Destroyer, Chad, Kaplan
I honestly don't understand how ppl can get a 15. Don't be afraid of this section. Do math destroyer and you'll be fine. (I only did 5 of their 11 tests!) However, I did a few of DAT Destroyer questions and they seemed a bit simplified.
Real DAT:
I am not a math wiz at all, but got in the the top 4%? I literally did not read a couple of the questions (just marked, but didn't feel like going back to them in the end), and finished with ~4 minutes to go over ones I was taking too long to figure out but knew I could answer. The key is to skip those that are chewing up time and come back to them. It did seem the last half was easier than the first half.
No matter what those 25AA/TS-er's say, I think anyone who scores in the top 10 percentile for AA and TS rocked it. This test tests your endurance and ability to keep a cool head in a high pressure situation. Doing well on the DAT is a great feat. For those who look at the 23+ breakdowns, don't be discouraged! Honestly, I think those who get 23+ are super-competitive in nature, very good test takers, just extremely genius, or studied for forever. (I'm not putting you super competitive DATers down, you guys were my inspiration after all 🙂). Dentistry is a competitive field--it takes someone at least some-what competitive to begin with, but that being said, I am only competitive because I have to be in order to get me where I want to go. I'm not competitive for the sake of being ahead of others. If you want to get a competitive score (one that will get you into d-school, since that is the point of the DAT after all), a 19-21 AA/TS is so do-able. Just keep your head up and remember why you are studying. Any questions, just PM me.
Oh, and about my time studying. I did 3-5 hours most days for 1.5 months, but felt more motivated as D-day was approaching and so got in about 6-12 hours 2 weeks up to the DAT. Pace yourself. Remember, slow and steady wins the race 😛.
BIO 19 (83.5)
GC 21 (91.6)
OC 20 (84.4)
PAT 20 (81.0)
RC 21 (88.9)
QR 21 (97.6)
AA 20 (93.4)
TS 20 (91.3)
Biology
Study Materials: Barron's AP, Kaplan, DAT Destroyer
I took the Kaplan class and utilized all their materials, and overall it was ok. The in-class stuff was pretty good because of the detail involved; it really fostered understanding. Kaplan's class + books + online resources + other materials (flashcards and quicksheets) all together covered basically everthing. However, if you choose to take Kaplan, couple it with an AP like Barron's or Cliff's. (I read Cliff's while taking the bio sequence and it was just too dry for me; Barron's is an uber-easy read and more entertaining than Cliff's in my opinion).
Real DAT: Yeah, it's random, but then again bio in general is "random." There's so many different subjects in biology that, in order to really test student's knowledge in biology it must be widespread questions. However, I got some weird questions--it was the format that was strange. There were a quite a few questions where the diagrams were soo confusing. I felt pretty good about bio, but the very first question had a diagram that I was like wtf? Mark, choose an answer, move on. Still don't get what they were asking in that question, and don't care 😎. Nothing specific from Destroyer, like I've been reading other ppl say, but reading the solutions in Destroyer is great review to solidify.
General Chemistry
Study Materials: Chad!, DAT Destroyer, Kaplan, Princeton AP Chem
I specifically wanted to do well in this section, so I started reviewing in May for this using the AP Chem. It was easy to understand, and with that being the only studying of gen chem I had done in years, gen chem turned out to be my highest score on the Kaplan Diagnostic Test. I only got through ~1/2 of it though--moved on to Kaplan. Kaplan was meh. Chad is amazing. Hands down. I know, I know, everyone says the same thing. Becaue of Chad, a part of me wishes I wouldn't have taken the Kaplan class, and just focused on Chad. However, I needed the structure of going to class and being responsible to get "homework" done. I bought Chad's videos exactly 1 month before my DAT and got through everything once, my weaknesses 2x. If you have the time, buy 2-3 months and go over the videos 2x and you'll be more than set.
Real DAT: Pretty straight forward, actually. Got a couple weird ones, but majority of it is basic. Not much calculation, just setting up mostly.
Organic Chemistry
Study Materials: Chad!, DAT Destroyer, Kaplan
This was the subject I studied the least for (besides RC). Went through Chads, which was most helpful in refreshing my memory. I like ochem to begin with, I'm good at guessing on most rxns, so I focused on the other subjects more and ochem last.
Real DAT: Basic stuff, not too many surprises thankfully. Finished with about 10 minutues to go over a few. It is key to get your timing/pace down!
Perceptual Ability
Study Materials: CDP
Practice makes perfect. I felt fine with PAT to begin with, so once I did a couple CDP tests, I focused on other material. However, the week of my test I did a CDP test every day, just to keep my brain in PAT mode.
Real DAT: I did not appreciate it, to be honest. Keyholes were o.k., a couple questionable ones. I was still a bit stirred up from the sciences, so I was taking a lot longer to answer than usual. TFE was alright. I've been hearing that the 'counting events' method doesn't work on the real thing, so for the last week I've been just trying to visualize the object on CDP, and I recommend that to those who have yet to take it. They weren't too crazy of objects, but counting only worked on 1 or 2. Angles were alright, but use CDP for this, as Kaplan's angles are far too easy. Hole punch: this made me angry! The holes were almost 1/2 the size of the ones seen in Kaplan or Achiever. Their folds were NOT symmetrical--nothing I've seen before, very sloppy. Cubes: probably got at least 5-7 different stacks, was flustered b/c of holes so I tried to race through this to save time. Pattern folding: not bad, but I've felt pretty good about patterns to begin with. Finished with only 1 or 2 minutes, but was ready for break.
Reading Comprehension
Study Materials: Kaplan practice tests, Achiever practice tests
Not much studying--just find what works for you and go for it. I like to read JAMA and JADA, so I was somewhat used to articles like this. Reading those journals helps. Although there are many words in JAMA & JADA articles I do not know, I read them because I will know what those words mean in the future. I have a legitimate motivation and interest in health sciences articles and I think it helps for RC. Be engaged in the article you are reading and you will retain more, and if you do not remember something you will remember where to find it.
Real DAT: As I did on practice tests, I just read the article. I jotted down a couple notes, but didn't use them. As long as you get your timing down and stay focused, it's not too bad of a section. I finished a few minutes early.
Quantitative Reasoning
Study Materials: Math Destroyer, Chad, Kaplan
I honestly don't understand how ppl can get a 15. Don't be afraid of this section. Do math destroyer and you'll be fine. (I only did 5 of their 11 tests!) However, I did a few of DAT Destroyer questions and they seemed a bit simplified.
Real DAT:
I am not a math wiz at all, but got in the the top 4%? I literally did not read a couple of the questions (just marked, but didn't feel like going back to them in the end), and finished with ~4 minutes to go over ones I was taking too long to figure out but knew I could answer. The key is to skip those that are chewing up time and come back to them. It did seem the last half was easier than the first half.
No matter what those 25AA/TS-er's say, I think anyone who scores in the top 10 percentile for AA and TS rocked it. This test tests your endurance and ability to keep a cool head in a high pressure situation. Doing well on the DAT is a great feat. For those who look at the 23+ breakdowns, don't be discouraged! Honestly, I think those who get 23+ are super-competitive in nature, very good test takers, just extremely genius, or studied for forever. (I'm not putting you super competitive DATers down, you guys were my inspiration after all 🙂). Dentistry is a competitive field--it takes someone at least some-what competitive to begin with, but that being said, I am only competitive because I have to be in order to get me where I want to go. I'm not competitive for the sake of being ahead of others. If you want to get a competitive score (one that will get you into d-school, since that is the point of the DAT after all), a 19-21 AA/TS is so do-able. Just keep your head up and remember why you are studying. Any questions, just PM me.
Oh, and about my time studying. I did 3-5 hours most days for 1.5 months, but felt more motivated as D-day was approaching and so got in about 6-12 hours 2 weeks up to the DAT. Pace yourself. Remember, slow and steady wins the race 😛.