Aloe paleo
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2019
- Messages
- 639
- Reaction score
- 382
Just got 2 rejections today (maybe I'll get more today lol). What's the highest number of rejections you got in one day?
Will tell you when they come.Just got 2 rejections today (maybe I'll get more today lol). What's the highest number of rejections you got in one day?
You are an interesting character, friend. How is it mid August and you have as many interviews as you do rejections? This is that instant gratification that @Goro talks about. Spread the love, mate.3 is the record so far for me.
Then some where I guess yield protection.
I mean.... yield protection is a thing... Not sure what his LizzyM is, but if its >75 the guy has a right to say that given his hard work...This is becoming my personal favorite reason or rejection. It's like saying "Basically, I was too good for them..."
It may be controversial what I am about to say but... guys... this is not a good mindset in conjunction with wanting to become a physician.
Where they pre or post secondary submission rejections? also mind sharing the schools? I have literally heard nothing back from ANY schools that I have applied for (30 at this point with most of apps completed in July)Just got 2 rejections today (maybe I'll get more today lol). What's the highest number of rejections you got in one day?
Or maybe your overall application appeals more to schools focused on research and academic and less on community medicine?Well I guess there isn’t much of an explanation other than that. Most of my interviews have been T20s (no brag) and I’ve been rejected by a variety of “lower” schools. But I guess the raptor kind of proved it wrong in that he has got IIs from schools across the board. Maybe I was more motivated for those secondaries
No offense intended, I just find it interesting that you decided you needed to make this comment... 😛Will tell you when they come.
I mean.... yield protection is a thing... Not sure what his LizzyM is, but if its >75 the guy has a right to say that given his hard work...
I think that analogy is completely different from saying you were yield protected (which again, is a real thing)He/She can say anything they want. I am just trying to see a bigger picture here. Think of T20 schools as your rich influential patients and your low-tier schools as your undeserved population. Now think of the "I was too good for them in that context"...
Think you’re reaching a bit
Yes, adcoms on this site acknowledge yield protectionMaybe, possibly. Also, did I miss something? Did an adcom ever come out and sait that - yes, we do yield protection - or is it based on empirycal measurements with no statistics behind?
one was pre-secondary (they said I don't have permanent residence in America--I am Canadian btw) and one was post secondary!Where they pre or post secondary submission rejections? also mind sharing the schools? I have literally heard nothing back from ANY schools that I have applied for (30 at this point with most of apps completed in July)
Yes, adcoms on this site acknowledge yield protection
I agree with parts of what you were saying, though. Most “low stats” schools are mission-based and look for attributes that many applicants don’t have. A rejection means you’re not a good fit for the school, not that you’re “too good” for that school.Ok then. I stand corrected!
Resource protection is a better descriptor.Yes, adcoms on this site acknowledge yield protection
So “I am inadequate because I suck” is better than “This school is just protecting their resources”? IDK, seems fishy to me.INTERNAL LOCI, Boys and girls (and the gender neutral)
Same phenomenon with a more politically correct nameResource protection is a better descriptor.
Chances are it's true unless you're a superstar applicant!So “I am inadequate because I suck” is better than “This school is just protecting their resources”? IDK, seems fishy to me.
I think it's slightly different. Yield protection makes it sound like they're trying to maintain some sort of matriculation rate for it's own sake, whereas resource protection sounds like they have limited adcom time/interview spots and want to make the most of it.Same phenomenon with a more politically correct name
Those are both saying the same thingI think it's slightly different. Yield protection makes it sound like they're trying to maintain some sort of matriculation rate for it's own sake, whereas resource protection sounds like they have limited adcom time/interview spots and want to make the most of it.
Different intent, same outcome. One says we care about a statistic because it makes us look good, the other says we want to make the most of limited resources.Those are both saying the same thing
It's not "yield protection!" It's resource management.Maybe, possibly. Also, did I miss something? Did an adcom ever come out and sait that - yes, we do yield protection - or is it based on empirycal measurements with no statistics behind?
I think both are true. How about we call it “YARP” Yield and Resource Protection.Different intent, same outcome. One says we care about a statistic because it makes us look good, the other says we want to make the most of limited resources.
They emailed me!How do you know if you've been rejected? There are a lot of schools that haven't offered me interviews, but none have been outright rejections. Am I missing something?
They will either email you or their classes will start without you hearing from them.How do you know if you've been rejected? There are a lot of schools that haven't offered me interviews, but none have been outright rejections. Am I missing something?
Yah, all four of those schools are not OOS friendly at all. It sucks if you are a non-Californian that wants to stay out west. Hell, it sucks even if you are from California lolOk. So, I got like four rejections thus far. All of them based on the fact that the schools I applied to have a strong preference for instate candidates. Both Nevada schools, Utah (requires a bachelors degree from the US), and Washington (preference for Alaska, Washington, Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming). Fair enough. That makes sense. My state MD school won't even look at apps until September. Thank God for Ativan! 🙂
You from Oklahoma?Ok. So, I got like four rejections thus far. All of them based on the fact that the schools I applied to have a strong preference for instate candidates. Both Nevada schools, Utah (requires a bachelors degree from the US), and Washington (preference for Alaska, Washington, Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming). Fair enough. That makes sense. My state MD school won't even look at apps until September. Thank God for Ativan! 🙂
Yah, all four of those schools are not OOS friendly at all. It sucks if you are a non-Californian that wants to stay out west. Hell, it sucks even if you are from California lol
Yes Sir!You from Oklahoma?
Yes Sir!
I think both are true. How about we call it “YARP” Yield and Resource Protection.
That was less creative than I wanted.
It's not "yield protection!" It's resource management.
Let's say that data indicates that a particular school can expect to interview 25 candidates with an MCAT of 522 to matriculate 1. The class size is 100 and there are only 500 interview slots. There are inadequate resources to expend in that category to achieve the desired result.
Ok. So, I got like four rejections thus far. All of them based on the fact that the schools I applied to have a strong preference for instate candidates. Both Nevada schools, Utah (requires a bachelors degree from the US), and Washington (preference for Alaska, Washington, Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming). Fair enough. That makes sense. My state MD school won't even look at apps until September. Thank God for Ativan! 🙂
What if you have connections to the area or school? How would you convey that to the admissions committee before being summarily rejected by a computer filter? Does anyone here have a list of schools that yield protect or engage in resource management as you phrase it? Not targeted at you, but I feel like admission committees should disclose that before accepting someone's application and the application fees.
Does anyone here have a list of schools that yield protect or engage in resource management as you phrase it?
DNAJB6 said:Not targeted at you, but I feel like admission committees should disclose that before accepting someone's application and the application fees.
Some state schools have holistic pre-screens for secondaries. One of my top choice schools in a state I lived in- and would love to move back to- has not sent me a secondary. Would it be appropriate to email them or call them asking if I can get a secondary? Or should I just apply to other schools in the state if that one in particular is very slow?You needed to make this known before or at same time as secondary, either by additional letter or by crafting a secondary response that included background info, no matter the question. Once your application is complete and being evaluated, it is essentially too late to update on state ties as you are already in OOS pile.
As for which schools have resource protection, you should have known this before you applied as this info can be gleaned from MSAR
1) OOS interview invites / OOS applicants
2) OOS matriculants / OOS invites
3) OOO matriculants / OOS applicants
These ratios should have been on your spreadsheet for each school you applied to. They would have indicated your chances.
Additionally, your indepth reading of each school’s website may have given some more info as many will discuss their OOS preferences. Many will say they only consider those with strong state ties.
Yes, state publics in smaller states are the exception . They almost always interview high stat applicants (there are some exceptions).If you have compelling connections to the area/school that make it clear they won’t be wasting their time by interviewing you it does make a difference. So if they have for example an “explain your connection to the xyz region” question that would be your chance to make it clear to them you are actually considering them as more than a “safety” school.
N=1 but I just interviewed at a school with such a prompt despite my stats being much higher than their 90th percentile because 1) It’s one of my state schools and 2) I have a strong connection to the area that I made clear in that question.
There is always a way to work in your strong connections to an area or school.What if you have connections to the area or school? How would you convey that to the admissions committee before being summarily rejected by a computer filter? Does anyone here have a list of schools that yield protect or engage in resource management as you phrase it? Not targeted at you, but I feel like admission committees should disclose that before accepting someone's application and the application fees.