
Tennesse: 17 Req (assuming AA)
Temple: 18 req
Pitt: Min 16 on each section
Oklahoma: 17 min
Ohio: 13 min PAT
North Car: 17 Req
NJ: min 18
Missouri: 17 preferred
Mich: Rec 17+ on science sections
Tufts: 16aa, 15pat, 16ts
Indiana: min 16, 18 RC
ICU: min 15 aa & pat 14
Nova: 18 req
Howard: 17 req
USC: 15 req
Slacker, where did yo get your info? I find it mathematically impossible for some of these schools to have these minimum DAT scores, yet still have the DAT averages they have. I haven't looked up the schools because I don't want to waste my time, but if I am not mistaken one school I know about becasue their scores are considered to be a joke is Howard. Their DAT scores are 17 overall and 16 PAT. It is IMPOSSIBLE to have an average of 16 and have a minimum of 17!!! HMMMM????? Also, it is nearly impossible to have a minimum of 17, but have an average of 17. That would mean everyone had to have a 17. Again, not possible. please verify the source of your info. I got mine from Predents.com which PDIZZLE got his from the ADEA handbook. Your numbers just don't add up unless they state they require a number but make LOTS of exceptions.
Tennesse: 17 Req (assuming AA)
Temple: 18 req
Pitt: Min 16 on each section
Oklahoma: 17 min
Ohio: 13 min PAT
North Car: 17 Req
NJ: min 18
Missouri: 17 preferred
Mich: Rec 17+ on science sections
Tufts: 16aa, 15pat, 16ts
Indiana: min 16, 18 RC
ICU: min 15 aa & pat 14
Nova: 18 req
Howard: 17 req
USC: 15 req
Tennesse: 17 Req (assuming AA)
Temple: 18 req
Pitt: Min 16 on each section
Oklahoma: 17 min
Ohio: 13 min PAT
North Car: 17 Req
NJ: min 18
Missouri: 17 preferred
Mich: Rec 17+ on science sections
Tufts: 16aa, 15pat, 16ts
Indiana: min 16, 18 RC
ICU: min 15 aa & pat 14
Nova: 18 req
Howard: 17 req
USC: 15 req