- Joined
- Dec 15, 2010
- Messages
- 34
- Reaction score
- 0
I was reading through a lot of the topics to answer some of my questions about how med schools react to GPA. I was wondering what the comparison is towards science and cumulative GPA. Do they consider them differently and/or place special emphasis towards science GPA?
Plus, how do the top tier med schools (I realize how stupid this sounds since all med schools are considered 'top tier' but I am talking about the top 10 medical schools based on rankings) react to a bad first semester of college?
On a side note, I have a 3.0 science GPA (3.3 cum) which is why I wanted to ask about the difference in emphasis laid by medical school and my goal is to attend Hopkins.
Thank you
PS- This topic is in no way a plea to be reassured about my GPA. I know I'll be fine if I work harder (and actually study) in the next cumulative years.
Plus, how do the top tier med schools (I realize how stupid this sounds since all med schools are considered 'top tier' but I am talking about the top 10 medical schools based on rankings) react to a bad first semester of college?
On a side note, I have a 3.0 science GPA (3.3 cum) which is why I wanted to ask about the difference in emphasis laid by medical school and my goal is to attend Hopkins.
Thank you
PS- This topic is in no way a plea to be reassured about my GPA. I know I'll be fine if I work harder (and actually study) in the next cumulative years.