Out of personal curiosity, does anyone think that the majority of the posters of this forum fall into a self-fulfilling prophecy by over-estimating the worth of their GPA / MCAT? After all, if the people here only have a competitive GPA / MCAT with extracurriculars they felt were "mandatory" then what else can the admissions committee really draw from the applicant in order to pull them apart from the other students?
I'm not denying that it's not a numbers game, but when you think about it, what's not in life? You can't just evaluate kids off of extracurriculars and neither should you evaluate applicants based solely on GPA/MCAT. It's always a mixed bag of worms. I think it's great that my fellow pre-meds care a lot about their scores. But sometimes I believe that they themselves attempt to find sympathy and victimize themselves around a system that they actually value. I'm sorry if I lost you. Just go back to the first question and that's basically what I'm asking.
I'm not denying that it's not a numbers game, but when you think about it, what's not in life? You can't just evaluate kids off of extracurriculars and neither should you evaluate applicants based solely on GPA/MCAT. It's always a mixed bag of worms. I think it's great that my fellow pre-meds care a lot about their scores. But sometimes I believe that they themselves attempt to find sympathy and victimize themselves around a system that they actually value. I'm sorry if I lost you. Just go back to the first question and that's basically what I'm asking.