Going back 5 or so years and in response to Medicare LCD changes, I stopped routinely doing iv sedation for MB RFN in my NJ practice based out of ASC. Never regretted. In my current practice environment, there is a strong institutional tradition of moderate sedation for all RF cases. The suggestion of local anesthesia only is reacted too as if cruel and inhuman.
Though I suspect that sedation has not been reimbursed for quite some time (and this fact was ignored or missed), it wasn’t until a week ago that we were informed that Medicare is denying authorization of any RF submitted for PA with a request for moderate sedation.
My recommendation has been to cease the routine use of moderate sedation, inform patients and reassure them that this is very common practice. If procedure fails under local anesthesia only, document that and use to justify necessity for sedation. Others are suggesting adding SmartPhrases that claim medical necessity based upon the need to maintain immobility in order to reduce potential harm. In addition, they are suggesting “careful documentation” of any intolerance of MBB to justify sedation. To me this seems like a lot of work and BS SmartPhrases to justify service that is not in fact medically necessary. I’m clearly in the minority on this, but I am also one of the very very few who have not trained and practiced exclusively in this institution.
Opinions??
Though I suspect that sedation has not been reimbursed for quite some time (and this fact was ignored or missed), it wasn’t until a week ago that we were informed that Medicare is denying authorization of any RF submitted for PA with a request for moderate sedation.
My recommendation has been to cease the routine use of moderate sedation, inform patients and reassure them that this is very common practice. If procedure fails under local anesthesia only, document that and use to justify necessity for sedation. Others are suggesting adding SmartPhrases that claim medical necessity based upon the need to maintain immobility in order to reduce potential harm. In addition, they are suggesting “careful documentation” of any intolerance of MBB to justify sedation. To me this seems like a lot of work and BS SmartPhrases to justify service that is not in fact medically necessary. I’m clearly in the minority on this, but I am also one of the very very few who have not trained and practiced exclusively in this institution.
Opinions??