SEE VS. ACE program with the ASA

[hippuppy]

---

Members don't see this ad.

I am familiar with ACE but have no experience with the SEE CME program. Does anyone have any experience with this program?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[ZzzPlz]

Bought a booklet by accident while I was studying for written boards. After about 5 questions I started getting frantic and re checked the cover.
They are very specific and anal questions about recent literature articles. I guess it would be good to stay up to date on the literature but they are brutally particular.

 

[Notorious T.E.E.]

Bought a booklet by accident while I was studying for written boards. After about 5 questions I started getting frantic and re checked the cover.
They are very specific and anal questions about recent literature articles. I guess it would be good to stay up to date on the literature but they are brutally particular.

I believe you are referring to the ACE program here. I bought it (ACE) one time, but like you didn't get a whole lot out of it, although there was one question/article that added something to my practice. I think the ACE has a role in CME, but at the price point I don't get enough out of it. The SEE is very good, 100 various written board style questions with explanations. I bought several over the years for CME and used them to study for the recertification exam successfully.

 

[caligas]

I believe you are referring to the ACE program here. I bought it (ACE) one time, but like you didn't get a whole lot out of it, although there was one question/article that added something to my practice. I think the ACE has a role in CME, but at the price point I don't get enough out of it. The SEE is very good, 100 various written board style questions with explanations. I bought several over the years for CME and used them to study for the recertification exam successfully.

Ace: 60 hours of easy CME for about tree-fiddy? Seems pretty good to me.