should I disclose that I'm transgender on my app? nervous :(

[premedbarista]

I'm trying to decide if I want to mention that I'm trans (or even just select the trans option for gender identity) on my application and I could really use some help. I'm legally male and identify as male, so I could just not pick the trans option bc it's none of their business if I didn't want to disclose it. With all of the anti trans policies the federal govt is pushing universities to adopt, I'm really nervous that being trans will put me at a disadvantage. I don't think adcoms would be prejudiced themselves against me, it's more that they might just have to do what they're told by the government and not want to admit me bc I present some logistical challenges (like if the govt says I can't use the correct bathroom or whatever).

However, being trans has been a big part of why I want to pursue medicine, bc medically transitioning made my life so much better and I want to help other people achieve that peace/happiness/healthiness too, so I feel weird about leaving it out of my app. I already can't mention the other big reason (mental health recovery related) so I feel like I'd just be making stuff up to fill the "why do you want to be a doctor" essay space after leaving out two very important personal journeys like that.

any advice? it would be super helpful if any adcom members could weigh in on what the political climate around this sort of thing is right now for you all.
thanks!

---

Members don't see this ad.

 

[Goro]

I'm reminded of the line from Exodus 3:14:

"And God said unto Moses, I Am That I Am."

Now, why am I telling you this? Well, you are who you are, so go for it!

Just don't apply to Loma Linda or LUCOM.

 

[LunaOri]

We see lots of trans applicants, and for some schools LGBTQ+ is a target demographic for recruiting. It won’t be a negative for most schools.

 

[polymerization]

Like Harvey Milk said all those years ago, we must come out. If we allow the chilling effect of the administration to push us back into the closet, they win. Not because, perhaps, you pass and have the option of flying under the radar, thus unaffected from the discrimination of the administration; but rather, because in obfuscating the truth of who you are you further marginalize the rest of the community that cannot hide who they are as readily.

It's about the principle. You didn't ask to be trans, just like I didn't ask to be gay. But, benefitting from the societal progress that LGBTQ+ folks created for us (not that long ago), we do have the responsibility to help perpetuate and even expand awareness and acceptance for posterity.

Think about what it was like growing up. Are you really at a place in your life where you want to hide again? Where you tiptoe in your own shoes, living in fear of being clocked with every interaction and anticipating the unspoken punishment of occupying a space where being yourself isn't OK?

I've thought a lot about it over the course of the last year; whether I wanted to talk about it or not. I ultimately chose to say it with pride.

 

[bbsq]

i had a friend who hired a private consultant to help with the admissions process. They just told them to avoid mentioning anything about diversity etc in their app this yr given the political climate. My friend said f- that, "ill be true to who i am".

Personally i dont think the med schools are on governments radar for this stuff right now. But regardless, we cant give in and go back.

 

[Mr.Smile12]

Personally i dont think the med schools are on governments radar for this stuff right now. But regardless, we cant give in and go back.

On the contrary, they are. See all the press about freezing research grants and the shuttering of DEI offices at various medical schools like UMich. They've been on the radar at many red states though not enabled to the extent we will expect thanks to the feds. LCME just pulled back on "enforcing" their diversity standard.

We have our Treating Trans Patients resource. We don't make it publicly open for cybersecurity reasons now, so if you want to join, PM me with a Google classroom-compliant email.

Also reach out to the Medical Student Pride Alliance.

 

[Hollow Knight]

I used to tell people not to worry about stuff like this. I'm on an adcom at a super conservative med school and nobody seemed to care, plenty of my classmates are in the LGBTQ+ community.

However, in light of recent events, and some blatant homophobia/transphobia I've seen from students and attendings, I might not would mention it. I think it would go over well at Harvard and poorly at your hilbilly state MD. I wish humans didn't suck so much. Good luck whatever you decide.

Also, all the talk about speaking truth to power sounds nice- however, if you want to help change this country for the better, you'll have more power to do that as a physician than a (for example) barista. I have had to lie about duty hours and had some awful experiences with the leadership of my medical school. Nobody from my school has any idea about this because as a medical student, I'm powerless. When I'm an attending I'll be really good to my students, but for now, I'm putting my head down and eating crap to get a residency. Just food for thought.

 

[Mr.Smile12]

I also add this resource from AMSA.

Gender & Sexuality - AMSA

www.amsa.org

Transgender Health - AMSA

www.amsa.org

 

[polymerization]

Also, all the talk about speaking truth to power sounds nice- however, if you want to help change this country for the better, you'll have more power to do that as a physician [...] I'm powerless. When I'm an attending I'll be really good to my students, but for now, I'm putting my head down and eating crap to get a residency.

That's a fair rebuttal that deserves a serious response.

If I'm understanding correctly, your course of action runs on a few assumptions: (1) that remaining silent/invisible guarantees safety; (2) that a non-response is not as performative as responding; and (3) that enduring will necessarily lead to an ascent to power.

Addressing the first point, I would hope you would agree with the observation that much of what is being targeted by mainstream politics is, for all intents and purposes, wildly arbitrary.

As the Overton window of what is considered "normal" to this administration narrows to form their own image, it will become impossible to sustain this strategy. I think the true consequence, more existentially, is that when you are inevitably targeted for being unable to perform normativity, you essentially guarantee that you will be alone. These environments don't just punish the people who resist, they also demand that you affirm them; and eventually, are complicit to contributing to marginalization. Clear discrimination becomes "the way things are."

That's why, addressing (2), not responding is performing in this situation. It's reinforcing the idea that discrimination is "the way things are" and not deserving of recognition. When we talk about inequality, we take for granted that inequality is made visible, named, and framed in that way. In not responding, you're contributing to the chilling effect I'm talking about, which is all part of the administration's plan: to silence dissent, by force if necessary, to later claim that—see, there was never any real inequality at all—nobody is complaining anymore, so progressive attempts to further marginalize those communities will be even more normatively tolerated.

But let's say you make it out. You graduate from a fantastic residency program, and you're an attending. Addressing point (3), there are no guarantees that the future as a site of social progress will still exist as a concept in four years. There are no guarantees that you'll be able to maintain the moral clarity and institutional wherewithal to be able to challenge the structures you're choosing not to resist now.

Surviving doesn't necessarily liberate, Foucault teaches, it disciplines.

By the time you're an attending, or even later still as an administrator with any kind of institutional power—it's logical to assume you've eaten enough crap to make radical action more—not less—difficult.