- Joined
- Jul 22, 2003
- Messages
- 2,002
- Reaction score
- 877
Let me quote a description of myself from a thread I started back in January that didn't get many responses:
The only difference between then and now is that I have been putting in a few hours a week volunteering at a local community hospital ER since July.
I've been thinking for the past few months that I'd apply to post-baccs over the winter, in time to start next summer or fall. Reading the posts on these forums, though, I wonder whether I'd be wasting my time and application fees. It seems like everyone who gets into these programs has a near-4.0 GPA, very noteworthy work experience, an outstanding philanthropic record (like being in the Peace Corps), a sob story to excuse their past bad grades, academic research experience, significant health-care related experience, or some combination of the above. I'm confident that I could handle the work, but I don't have much to make me look good on paper: my GPA is "only" 3.1, I haven't exactly been spending the years since college out saving the world by founding my own orphanages and AIDS hospices, my parents didn't die leaving me to raise my younger siblings by myself, I don't have an MPH or my name on any published papers...
I'm in Philly and it would be nice to stay here, though obviously, if that's not possible, I'll do what it takes to become a doctor. So, I've been thinking about Penn, Drexel, Temple, maybe Bryn Mawr--the last being a very long shot, I suppose. Is it worth applying to Bryn Mawr? They say their GPA cutoff is 3.0, but people in other threads have made it sound like you already have to be a Nobel winner to get in. I know Harvard Extension is open enrollment, even if you have to do well enough once you're there to qualify for their sponsorship, but that would be a last resort for me because of the cost of living in Boston.
Am I complaining too much, or do my impressions sound accurate? It just sounds like everyone around here is either coming from a background where they have work experience in another health care field, and thus are perceived as being "on the inside" already, or have really stellar academic and personal qualifications. Do any people like me get into formal post-baccs, or should I forget it and start taking the classes a la carte?
- 27 year old white male
- Software developer at a big pharma company
- Graduate of a well-respected small liberal arts college with a B.A. in Music
- 3.1 undergrad GPA
- Only relevant college science coursework: Gen Chem I, C-; Gen Chem II, B+
- A few other scattered bad grades, including an F in multivariable calculus
- 2 extracurricular activities in college: Chapel Choir and band
- No post-college "extracurricular activities" (i.e., community clubs)
- No community service volunteering
- No medically related volunteering or shadowing experiences YET (just requested a volunteer application from the local community hospital, but haven't received it yet)
The only difference between then and now is that I have been putting in a few hours a week volunteering at a local community hospital ER since July.
I've been thinking for the past few months that I'd apply to post-baccs over the winter, in time to start next summer or fall. Reading the posts on these forums, though, I wonder whether I'd be wasting my time and application fees. It seems like everyone who gets into these programs has a near-4.0 GPA, very noteworthy work experience, an outstanding philanthropic record (like being in the Peace Corps), a sob story to excuse their past bad grades, academic research experience, significant health-care related experience, or some combination of the above. I'm confident that I could handle the work, but I don't have much to make me look good on paper: my GPA is "only" 3.1, I haven't exactly been spending the years since college out saving the world by founding my own orphanages and AIDS hospices, my parents didn't die leaving me to raise my younger siblings by myself, I don't have an MPH or my name on any published papers...
I'm in Philly and it would be nice to stay here, though obviously, if that's not possible, I'll do what it takes to become a doctor. So, I've been thinking about Penn, Drexel, Temple, maybe Bryn Mawr--the last being a very long shot, I suppose. Is it worth applying to Bryn Mawr? They say their GPA cutoff is 3.0, but people in other threads have made it sound like you already have to be a Nobel winner to get in. I know Harvard Extension is open enrollment, even if you have to do well enough once you're there to qualify for their sponsorship, but that would be a last resort for me because of the cost of living in Boston.
Am I complaining too much, or do my impressions sound accurate? It just sounds like everyone around here is either coming from a background where they have work experience in another health care field, and thus are perceived as being "on the inside" already, or have really stellar academic and personal qualifications. Do any people like me get into formal post-baccs, or should I forget it and start taking the classes a la carte?