- Joined
- Nov 29, 2007
- Messages
- 166
- Reaction score
- 4
Hi everyone,
If anyone has the time, I would greatly appreciate constructive input/criticism. I am a non-traditional student, earning a 3.03 GPA as a Biology major after 4 years at UCLA, and have completed the Health Careers Program (a post-bacc) at Harvard University with a GPA of 3.65 (after 9 courses), taking only upper-division Biology courses. I have tons of leadership experience with multiple years as president and such of my academic professional fraternity, church youth group leader, 100+ hours shadowing, 3 years research experience with polycystic kidney disease, and other extracurrics.
I have the following DAT scores.
PAT=23 (the only score I'm proud of)
QR=18
RC=19
Bio=19
GChem=20
OChem=19
TSA=19
AA=19
With schools being able see all attempts at the DAT, does anyone have input on whether I should take the DATs again? Although my scores are competitive for someone with a 3.5 GPA out of undergrad, my undergrad grades are lacking to say the least. Thanks so much!
If anyone has the time, I would greatly appreciate constructive input/criticism. I am a non-traditional student, earning a 3.03 GPA as a Biology major after 4 years at UCLA, and have completed the Health Careers Program (a post-bacc) at Harvard University with a GPA of 3.65 (after 9 courses), taking only upper-division Biology courses. I have tons of leadership experience with multiple years as president and such of my academic professional fraternity, church youth group leader, 100+ hours shadowing, 3 years research experience with polycystic kidney disease, and other extracurrics.
I have the following DAT scores.
PAT=23 (the only score I'm proud of)
QR=18
RC=19
Bio=19
GChem=20
OChem=19
TSA=19
AA=19
With schools being able see all attempts at the DAT, does anyone have input on whether I should take the DATs again? Although my scores are competitive for someone with a 3.5 GPA out of undergrad, my undergrad grades are lacking to say the least. Thanks so much!