It seems like many med schools are making the move to limit in-class meetings and clinical work in M1/M2, but do you see any schools outright canceling M3/M4 clinical rotations for coronavirus? I don't see how this could possibly work.
I just got notice my EM rotation starting in April was canceled by the hospital due to COVID-19. Sucks because this is a graduation requirement. Had to scramble to find another nearby hospital.
Is this for m3 or m4 requirement? If M4 I would call the school and inquire what if you cannot find one at such short notice. I would hope that the school can/will waive it. M3? You have a whole other year to fulfill it. Take a home elective or something during that time.
Not in a teaching hospital. But got a notice today regarding we “may” run out of ppe for the hospital, need to limit non-essential personnel and students (mostly observational roles).
I am allergic to the “regular” mask they have in the OR. Smelled shortage on masks weeks ago. Thank God had them ordered some back then.![]()
Tell that to my school..students should be pulled from ED rotations. ICU is probably OK given most of them will hopefully be tested. ED is just too risky for any med student who is not really involved directly in the care and only there for learning
Maybe it's just me but wouldn't it be a good learning experience to be in the ICU during a pandemic? Getting to see how doctors make certain decisions, resource limited, etc. I understand it's still a risk to the patients to have unnecessary people around.students should be pulled from ED rotations. ICU is probably OK given most of them will hopefully be tested. ED is just too risky for any med student who is not really involved directly in the care and only there for learning
Maybe it's just me but wouldn't it be a good learning experience to be in the ICU during a pandemic? Getting to see how doctors make certain decisions, resource limited, etc. I understand it's still a risk to the patients to have unnecessary people around.
This makes sense but it's hard to pull an entire class off rotations indefinitely and have them graduate on time.If the M3/M4 year is glorified shadowing, they should just shut down the rotations and not let students get any unnecessary exposure or at least put them in "lower risk" rotations.
This makes sense but it's hard to pull an entire class off rotations indefinitely and have them graduate on time.
Absolutely. I don't know what the LCME considers essential to undergraduate medical education, but if you start pulling people off of core rotations like medicine, obgyn, etc., there will be chaos, even though everyone knows the med students are far from "essential personnel."There are a number of rotations they could easily just waive as a graduation requirement. Like we have 3 rural medicine/hospital rotations required, and there is no argument that will convince me that it is absolutely vital to my training that I do all 3 before I graduate.
Not sure how much help you'd actually be. The risk/benefit of having someone who has seen the process for future pandemics may be useful or harmful. Not sure where the balance lies but everyone here seems to think that having medical students around is absolutely 100% bad. I don't think that's necessarily the case.Second this. I would love to be there to help wherever I could and experience it. But I understand that having nonessential personal is a risk... then again, there could be a point when a med student becomes essential if the healthcare system becomes overwhelmed. Considering I’m 26 and have a strong immune system, I would be more than happy to take on the personal risk in order to assist and do some good
Not sure how much help you'd actually be. The risk/benefit of having someone who has seen the process for future pandemics may be useful or harmful. Not sure where the balance lies but everyone here seems to think that having medical students around is absolutely 100% bad. I don't think that's necessarily the case.
Although I would appreciate a vacation as much as the next guy, Its a little crazy to just shut down rotations, because of risk of exposure. We have plenty of risks in normal activities like operating on HIV+ patients, patients with undiagnosed TB , MRSA, Flu etc. If this was ebola or SARS i would understand..
also it is telling when the Uk has plans to give more responsibilities to final year medical students in the event of personal shortages vs here it is the exact opposite.
People should be given a choice as to how much risk they are willing to take as a student .
What worries me is that those who do end up working might get little sleep because only those deemed "essential" are asked to work. They become immunosuppressed and then get taken out by the virus for 14 days at least/become seriously ill and are lost from the system completely. There are threads on twitter of MLPs asking if they should be taught how to do vents. I think someone needs to come up with a plan for how best to use medical students and MLPs in the case of a catastrophic surge in the system. No it shouldn't be adjusting vents but I'm sure there are tasks that can be completed that could actually help those few doctors who can stay in the hospital while allowing them to do the essential things (how it should be anyways, but that's a conversation for another time).Apparently it's documented that during the Spanish Flu there were a number of hospitals that used medical students as providers once the initial staff started getting sick
I mean yeah, I think it would be too. I love the ICU. But you have to weigh the risks and benefits. For most students, if they no interest in ICU, they are putting themselves at risk. Although, I think it's a more informed risk compared to the ED where you are just going blind and have no idea who has COVID or not.Maybe it's just me but wouldn't it be a good learning experience to be in the ICU during a pandemic? Getting to see how doctors make certain decisions, resource limited, etc. I understand it's still a risk to the patients to have unnecessary people around.
Although I would appreciate a vacation as much as the next guy, Its a little crazy to just shut down rotations, because of risk of exposure. We have plenty of risks in normal activities like operating on HIV+ patients, patients with undiagnosed TB , MRSA, Flu etc. If this was ebola or SARS i would understand..
also it is telling when the Uk has plans to give more responsibilities to final year medical students in the event of personal shortages vs here it is the exact opposite.
People should be given a choice as to how much risk they are willing to take as a student .
I’m sure one consideration for schools is whether they will get sued if their students end up with a Coronavirus on rotations
Although I would appreciate a vacation as much as the next guy, Its a little crazy to just shut down rotations, because of risk of exposure. We have plenty of risks in normal activities like operating on HIV+ patients, patients with undiagnosed TB , MRSA, Flu etc. If this was ebola or SARS i would understand..
also it is telling when the Uk has plans to give more responsibilities to final year medical students in the event of personal shortages vs here it is the exact opposite.
People should be given a choice as to how much risk they are willing to take as a student .
its a little absurd to compain about the possibility of being mauled by a bear when you sign up to become a bear trainer.I’m sure one consideration for schools is whether they will get sued if their students end up with a Coronavirus on rotations
They are not. Giving a choice innately allows people to take on more risk or lower risk, Avoiding sick patients I still hold is a little absurd.Your two paragraphs are contradictory.
waiiiiitttt whatttt???? I have to be around sick people in medical school? damn that blows. I wish I knew that before I started.....*enter premed with no healthcare/patient care experience with super high gpa/MCAT, WHY CANT I GET ACCEPTED to medical school????*its a little absurd to compain about the possibility of being mauled by a bear when you sign up to become a bear trainer.
They are not. Giving a choice innately allows people to take on more risk or lower risk, Avoiding sick patients I still hold is a little absurd.
waiiiiitttt whatttt???? I have to be around sick people in medical school? damn that blows. I wish I knew that before I started.....*enter premed with no healthcare/patient care experience with super high gpa/MCAT, WHY CANT I GET ACCEPTED to medical school????*
Exactly. If i were “essential” personnel, that would make sense. As I am not, I just in the way and another source of transmission.Ridiculous premise. Why should I be spreading COVID for no reason other than to stand behind my attending and shadow? I have no problem treating a HIV patient. COVID is clearly a different equation.
Although I would appreciate a vacation as much as the next guy, Its a little crazy to just shut down rotations, because of risk of exposure. We have plenty of risks in normal activities like operating on HIV+ patients, patients with undiagnosed TB , MRSA, Flu etc. If this was ebola or SARS i would understand..
also it is telling when the Uk has plans to give more responsibilities to final year medical students in the event of personal shortages vs here it is the exact opposite.
People should be given a choice as to how much risk they are willing to take as a student .
Lol our class president brought this up in a meeting and was instantly shot down with, "you signed a waiver when you started med school blah blah blah."
Call me a cynic, but I doubt the concern is for med students per se. The concern is where you're going to take the bug when you get it. Will you go from patient to patient spreading the germs? Not the same with HIV.
I guess, but realistically the Nursing staff, the PCAs, the food workers, the residents, the attendings seem to be a larger nidus of infeciton. I understand that I am not essential to the care of patients. But then it seems like it s problem with the system not utilizing me.
The resident theoretically is non-essential as well , you could say that they are increasing the number of people in that room considering the attending has to see the patient anyway .
To everyone talking about how not going into these rooms is going to be somewhat protective of them, community spread is probably the largest risk right now, and once they graduate they magically will not have this option left to them to not see patients as a resident.
There are hospitals that function without residents all the time.Actually residents are pretty essential. Not sure how to even make sense of the notion they're not. As for everyone else you mentioned, they are directly involved in caring for the patient. They HAVE to go into the room. Not so for med students. I do think there's some role for med students, but in trying to stop the spread in hospitals, maybe not in the ED.
There are hospitals that function without residents all the time.
The attending has to lay eyes and hands on the patient. The resident does not. If you want to truely reduce extraneous hands you would cut out any touch or exposure that is not absolutely necessary.
we are talking about eliminating all unnecessary risks here. I am just talking about a logical conclusion of this argument.Those hospitals are not academic hospitals. Academic hospitals, for the most part, are resident-run. The attending lays eyes to bill and to make sure the right diagnosis/treatment plan is made, but let's not compare the necessity of med students to the necessity of residents.
we are talking about eliminating all unnecessary risks here. I am just talking about a logical conclusion of this argument.
You are allowing another set of trainee's to continue to train because its easier on your work flow. Not because they are necessary for the care of the patient.
Oh come on. I know how academic hospitals work. Your comment shows a profound lack of understanding between what is necessary for treating a patient, and what is necessary for efficiency or how academic hospitals are structured.Residents ARE necessary for the care of the patient. The above shows a profound lack of knowledge of how academic hospitals operate.
Oh come on. I know how academic hospitals work. Your comment shows a profound lack of understanding between what is necessary for treating a patient, and what is necessary for efficiency or how academic hospitals are structured.
Oh gosh, i wonder how non academic hospitals even function. Maybe you should actually address the argument instead of attacking my understanding.If you knew anything about academic hospitals, then you would know the significant ramifications of sending hundreds of licensed physicians at your hospital home during a pandemic.
Lcme is going to have to make some exceptions if there is going to be widespread displacement of medical students .Not sure if this has been answered but is there a certain amount of rotations (clinical hours) that 4th years need to graduate? Like mandated by whomever makes the rules (the LCME?). Is it even possible to pull 4th years without having them make up the time missed so they can graduate?
Lol I don’t trust that anyone in a medicine administration role is rational.Lcme is going to have to make some exceptions if there is going to be widespread displacement of medical students .
Well you know all those boomers all lived in the hospitalLol I don’t trust that anyone in a medicine administration role is rational.
What worries me is that those who do end up working might get little sleep because only those deemed "essential" are asked to work. They become immunosuppressed and then get taken out by the virus for 14 days at least/become seriously ill and are lost from the system completely. There are threads on twitter of MLPs asking if they should be taught how to do vents. I think someone needs to come up with a plan for how best to use medical students and MLPs in the case of a catastrophic surge in the system. No it shouldn't be adjusting vents but I'm sure there are tasks that can be completed that could actually help those few doctors who can stay in the hospital while allowing them to do the essential things (how it should be anyways, but that's a conversation for another time).
The city of Philadelphia is considering reopening Hahnemann if things get too bad...Medical students used to manage lots of patients with minimal supervision. That was a different time, before liability and complexity of medicine.
Besides, the number of qualified physicians to run vents won’t be the limiting factor. It will be the ICU beds and vents themselves.