Side gig gone wrong

Started by coffeebythelake
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
coffeebythelake

coffeebythelake

I'm not a word-mincer
Lifetime Donor
Verified Member
Physician
Faculty
20+ Year Member
Gold Donor
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
www.kcentv.com

Ex-Medical Director of Wortham med spa surrenders to authorities on 25-count warrant

Michael Gallagher and Amber Johnson face multiple charges, including felony murder, after a patient's 2023 death linked to an IV procedure.
www.kcentv.com www.kcentv.com

If you are renting out your medical license for passive income, you put your patients at risk and your own license on the line. In this particular case felony charges. Just stick to the stock investing.
 
Last edited:
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Screenshot_20260504_155032_Samsung Internet.jpg


He didn't go to some podunk training program and he did a cardiac fellowship not too long ago. His picture made him look like he was 60
 
coffeebythelake said:
www.kcentv.com

Ex-Medical Director of Wortham med spa surrenders to authorities on 25-count warrant

Michael Gallagher and Amber Johnson face multiple charges, including felony murder, after a patient's 2023 death linked to an IV procedure.
www.kcentv.com www.kcentv.com

If you are renting out your medical license for passive income, you put your patients at risk and your own license on the line. In this particular case felony charges. Just stick to the stock investing.
Click to expand...
How much do you think Gallagher was making in this arrangement?
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
MirrorTodd said:
I'm not familiar with autopsies, why would they test vitreous fluid and not perform a normal bmp?
Click to expand...

They often sample vitreous fluid (the clear gel inside the eye) during an autopsy because it is relatively protected from early postmortem breakdown, bacterial contamination, and some of the changes that affect blood after death. That makes it useful for certain lab measurements.

The main reasons are:

Electrolytes and chemistry — things like potassium, sodium, chloride, glucose, urea, and creatinine can help evaluate dehydration, severe electrolyte disturbance, diabetic ketoacidosis, kidney failure, or marked hyperglycemia before death. Time-since-death estimation — vitreous potassium tends to rise after death in a somewhat predictable way, so it can contribute to estimating the postmortem interval. It’s only one clue, not an exact clock. Toxicology — sometimes for alcohol, drugs, or when blood results may be harder to interpret because of postmortem changes.

A simple way to think of it: after death, blood chemistry can become unreliable fairly quickly, but vitreous fluid often preserves a cleaner biochemical snapshot.


Chatgpt
 
coffeebythelake said:
They often sample vitreous fluid (the clear gel inside the eye) during an autopsy because it is relatively protected from early postmortem breakdown, bacterial contamination, and some of the changes that affect blood after death. That makes it useful for certain lab measurements.

The main reasons are:

Electrolytes and chemistry — things like potassium, sodium, chloride, glucose, urea, and creatinine can help evaluate dehydration, severe electrolyte disturbance, diabetic ketoacidosis, kidney failure, or marked hyperglycemia before death. Time-since-death estimation — vitreous potassium tends to rise after death in a somewhat predictable way, so it can contribute to estimating the postmortem interval. It’s only one clue, not an exact clock. Toxicology — sometimes for alcohol, drugs, or when blood results may be harder to interpret because of postmortem changes.

A simple way to think of it: after death, blood chemistry can become unreliable fairly quickly, but vitreous fluid often preserves a cleaner biochemical snapshot.


Chatgpt
Click to expand...
How does one interpret a K of 10 in the vitreous? Based on the case, it kinda seems like they are blaming the TPN electrolytes, I presume for having a high K concentration. The defense seems to be that she took a whole bunch of drugs before coming in for the infusion.
 
MirrorTodd said:
How does one interpret a K of 10 in the vitreous? Based on the case, it kinda seems like they are blaming the TPN electrolytes, I presume for having a high K concentration. The defense seems to be that she took a whole bunch of drugs before coming in for the infusion.
Click to expand...

Yeah don't know.. a potassium of 10 if that is reflective of serum potassium would suggest a medication error such as wrongly formulated iv fluid or tpn given too quickly (like a KCl rider wide open)

Im curious to know what was composition in the iv solution administered. The complaint said that she was also given a sedative by iv
 
Last edited:
Most of these “medical directors” are actually medical directors at 10-12 “spas” each at $5k a month. It actually adds up a lot. Great jobs for semi retired docs.

Like others said. It can carry risk. So the trick is to actually “assistant medical director “ at $2000 a month. Attend one meeting a month.

Pays less. Less liability. Don’t have to be on site Notice the assistant medical director didn’t get charged. Being assistant medical director is the real chess move.
 
Part of the issue is that the medical director was allegedly practicing medicine without a license. The article doesn't really explain how he was practicing medicine without a license. Maybe these places shouldn't administer TPN?
 
arkgal said:
Part of the issue is that the medical director was allegedly practicing medicine without a license. The article doesn't really explain how he was practicing medicine without a license. Maybe these places shouldn't administer TPN?
Click to expand...
That doesn’t make any sense. The Texas board suspended his medical license. One of the reasons these medispa (often owned by non mediciine) people seek medical director is they need someone who has medical license.

Pay them a small amount. Tell them they don’t need to be on site. So it’s easy cash for the doctors who licenses.
 
MirrorTodd said:
How does one interpret a K of 10 in the vitreous? Based on the case, it kinda seems like they are blaming the TPN electrolytes, I presume for having a high K concentration. The defense seems to be that she took a whole bunch of drugs before coming in for the infusion.
Click to expand...

coffeebythelake said:
Yeah don't know.. a potassium of 10 if that is reflective of serum potassium would suggest a medication error such as wrongly formulated iv fluid or tpn given too quickly (like a KCl rider wide open)

Im curious to know what was composition in the iv solution administered. The complaint said that she was also given a sedative by iv
Click to expand...


Vitreous K+ apparently rises with time after death. So initial serum K+ when she arrived at the hospital would be more telling.




IMG_1517.jpeg
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
One of the charges is practicing medicine without a license. Who knows if this person had a medical condition or took medications that predisposed them to having hyperkalemia.
aneftp said:
That doesn’t make any sense. The Texas board suspended his medical license. One of the reasons these medispa (often owned by non mediciine) people seek medical director is they need someone who has medical license.

Pay them a small amount. Tell them they don’t need to be on site. So it’s easy cash for the doctors who licenses.
Click to expand...
 
arkgal said:
One of the charges is practicing medicine without a license. Who knows if this person had a medical condition or took medications that predisposed them to having hyperkalemia.
Click to expand...
That’s subject to interpretation. He had active full unrestricted medical license.

What the board and charges found were this
“

The Board panel found that Dr. Gallagher failed to properly supervise an unlicensed individual performing intravenous (IV) treatments, including administering prescription pharmaceutical solutions, resulting in complications that staff were not trained or prepared to manage, resulting in a patient's death.”
 
aneftp said:
That’s subject to interpretation. He had active full unrestricted medical license.

What the board and charges found were this
“

The Board panel found that Dr. Gallagher failed to properly supervise an unlicensed individual performing intravenous (IV) treatments, including administering prescription pharmaceutical solutions, resulting in complications that staff were not trained or prepared to manage, resulting in a patient's death.”
Click to expand...
The first charge listed states he was practicing medicine without a license. Not much room for interpretation there. Whether the charge has merit is a different matter.

The patient has lethal levels of tramadol and trazodone and a history of substance abuse, including multiple legal charges related to drug use. Also had cardiomegaly. I'm surprised this is being prosecuted and I think murder or manslaughter will be hard to prove beyond a reasonable doubt. Probably the only reason the medical director was charged is because the person administering the medication under his supervision was not licensed. Had then been a PA or nurse doing the administration, I don't think the medical director would had been charged. I don't see how they can prove the patient died from too much potassium given the drugs in her system.
 
arkgal said:
The first charge listed states he was practicing medicine without a license. Not much room for interpretation there. Whether the charge has merit is a different matter.

The patient has lethal levels of tramadol and trazodone and a history of substance abuse, including multiple legal charges related to drug use. Also had cardiomegaly. I'm surprised this is being prosecuted and I think murder or manslaughter will be hard to prove beyond a reasonable doubt. Probably the only reason the medical director was charged is because the person administering the medication under his supervision was not licensed. Had then been a PA or nurse doing the administration, I don't think the medical director would had been charged. I don't see how they can prove the patient died from too much potassium given the drugs in her system.
Click to expand...
He had an active medical license.

The board interpreted he was the supervisor of a unlicensed person doing the iv (the lady charged in the counts)

That’s a stretch to say he was practicing without a license. But yes. The board interpreted it as unlicense medical practice.

If that were the case. The board should charge every cardiologist with the same charges ordering unlicensed fake nurse in Florida with giving sedating drugs in the cath lab (it is a true story) all over the news. Yet the Florida board didn’t do that.
 
aneftp said:
He had an active medical license.

The board interpreted he was the supervisor of a unlicensed person doing the iv (the lady charged in the counts)

That’s a stretch to say he was practicing without a license. But yes. The board interpreted it as unlicense medical practice.

If that were the case. The board should charge every cardiologist with the same charges ordering unlicensed fake nurse in Florida with giving sedating drugs in the cath lab (it is a true story) all over the news. Yet the Florida board didn’t do that.
Click to expand...
No. You're incredibly obtuse. I'm not talking about the board of medicine.

The BOARD suspended his license for failing to properly supervise an unlicensed individual administering IV fluids.

The STATE is charging him with a felony count of practicing medicine without a license. As in, a prosecutor.
 
arkgal said:
The patient has lethal levels of tramadol and trazodone and a history of substance abuse, including multiple legal charges related to drug use.
Click to expand...
The defense said the patient had lethal levels, but they also provided reference levels of tramadol and its metabolite. Her levels seemed to be within normal therapeutic levels. Correct me if I’m wrong about it. Chest tightness and dyspnea don’t seem consistent with overdose. (But as a lawyer I guess they might exaggerate in favor of their client). Given that it coincided with the infusion and the symptoms - air embolism maybe? Could it be missed on autopsy though. Obviously other possibilities as well.
Edit: nevermind on the embolism. It looks like it happened 15-30 mins after it started.
 
Last edited:
arkgal said:
No. You're incredibly obtuse. I'm not talking about the board of medicine.

The BOARD suspended his license for failing to properly supervise an unlicensed individual administering IV fluids.

The STATE is charging him with a felony count of practicing medicine without a license. As in, a prosecutor.
Click to expand...
Did he or did he have a full unrestricted medical license in 2023 when this event occurred?

Now if the board of medicine suspended his license after the event and he continued to practice medicine. That’s different

This story is very hard to follow to be honest.

“Based on reports from the Texas Medical Board and KWTX, Dr. Michael Gallagher was not necessarily practicing without a license himself, but was accused of allowing an unlicensed person to practice medicine under his supervision, leading to a patient's death”
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
  • Question Question
What's Your Locums Gig Meal Plan?
Replies
44
Views
4K
SRYSPAC
S
TeslaCoil
Physician Side Hustles
2 3
Replies
112
Views
12K
Status Sciaticus
Status Sciaticus
Gator7
Botox side gig
Replies
39
Views
10K
IMGASMD
I
P
Rate this "cardiac" locum gig
Replies
7
Views
2K
CubsDynasty
C
D
Wrong end? Double lumen tube exchange catheter
Replies
10
Views
2K
urge
urge