- Joined
- Mar 7, 2005
- Messages
- 28,735
- Reaction score
- 53,853
As for clinical experience abroad, I definitely mentioned that in secondary essays, explained the pros of more global experience in terms of opportunity (I get to watch/assist in neurosugeries, work in the ER, start a foundation for the poor, etc.) and perspective and reasoned why I would choose to practice in the US vs. the Philippines, as selfish as that may sound.)
The things you describe doing in the Philippines aren't necessarily a plus particularly if you haven't had comparable experiences in the US and if you then "reason" why you'd prefer to practice in the US. That practicing in the US is "selfish" in your eyes does raise a red flag, too.
I cannot assure, however, that I had stellar LORs, I can only hope that I do because the people I asked were amazing and were a huge part of my life.
Having letters from peple who were a huge part of your life may be the problem. Ideally, the letter writers should be people who know you from the classroom, lab or work setting. While it is possible that you may have socialized at campus or work events, they shouldn't be "friends" or "friends of the family". Every letter writer begins the letter with how they know the applicant and if they've known your family for generations and gave you an opportunity to shadow or work in the lab or whatever, everything is colored by the fact that you are "friends" and therefore the letter writter is unlikely to be unbiased. If you were going to read a restaurant review, would you rather it be from someone who visited the restaurant three times over the course of two months but otherwise knows nothing about it or one written by the best friend of the restaurant owner's son.