Ok then just to follow up, not counting CT, so we've got the esophagus, stomach, and small intestine covered. Now what about the colon....
a.) In terms of nomenclature, is barium enema is basically like a "lower GI series"?
b.) How far does the barium enema go (cecum-> anus?)
c.) What the heck is an "air enema" in terms of what it helps you visualize?
We haven't really covered small bowel beyond the proximal duodenum. In an adult, that's about as far as you'll reliably be able to evaluate on an upper GI series. In young children, an upper GI has to evaluate all the way to the duodenojejunal junction in order to exclude midgut malrotation, but that's a targeted exam with a very specific question that needs to be answered.
In the world of fluoroscopy, the only thing we've got in modern times is a small bowel follow-through (SBFT). These are commonly (and uselessly) added onto upper GI series. I suppose there are still a few places that trot out the SBFT's decrepit relative, enteroclysis, but that's has largely gone the way of the dodo. The best thing imaging-wise to evaluate the small bowel is really CT or MR enterography, and I've found even those to be lacking. Frankly, it's just not an organ that we can image well, particularly if you're looking for mucosal abnormalities as seen in a malabsorption disorder or infiltrative process (e.g. eosinophilia). We're a little better for masses or strictures.
An enema should evaluate from at least the cecum to the proximal rectum. The balloon will often obscure the distal rectum, which says nothing of the osseous pelvis getting in the way. If there's reflux, then you might get a look at the terminal ileum. If you're asking a radiologist to evaluate the anus with an enema, then realize that we're laughing at you. It does happen though, as in they send a newborn with lower GI obstruction for enema and the radiologist is the one that realizes there's an imperforate anus because the pediatricians never bothered to do a thorough physical exam (seen this twice).
Ideally, an upper GI or an enema should be "double-contrast", meaning we administer positive enteric contrast (frequently barium) and then find a way to get gas into the GI tract. If we're successful, then the barium clings to the mucosal and is well outlined by the gas. In the upper tract, we do this by administering effervescent crystals. For an enema, we insufflate with room air, which is frequently not well tolerated. If there is a focused clinical question or if the patient simply can't tolerate it (e.g. post-op leak status post bariatric surgery), then we can do a single-contrast study whereby we just administer contrast and dispense with the gas.
Thanks to
@Winged Scapula for the shoutout.