- Joined
- Jul 12, 2007
- Messages
- 723
- Reaction score
- 22
- Points
- 4,671
In skeletal muscle, we have the end plate potential (ach binds, triggers entry of Na+, Apotential, which propagates to trigger opening of Ca2+ channels of SER)...
In smooth muscle (single unit specifically which have gap junctions aka electrical synapses), dont these Na+ ions travel from one cell tot he next, depolarize the next cell, causing entry of Ca2+ ions from the ECF, which then mediates the contraction of smooth muscle?
I ask this, because basically, there was a queston in the TBR bio:
The conduction velocity of APotentials along smooth muscle fiber is low because activation of:
1.) Na2+ channels
2.) Ca2+ channels
I put down Na2+ because AP velocity is dictated by Na2+ ions correct in smooth muscle, while contraction is mediated by Ca2+ ions....but apparently the answer is Ca2+ channels
From my understanding the ONLY cells I am aware of from physiology that can impact AP velocity are the AUTORHYTHMIC cells in your cardiac cells which have that funny current and whose depolarizations and triggering of Action potentials are mediated by the entry of Ca2+ ions...
So where did I go wrong?
In smooth muscle (single unit specifically which have gap junctions aka electrical synapses), dont these Na+ ions travel from one cell tot he next, depolarize the next cell, causing entry of Ca2+ ions from the ECF, which then mediates the contraction of smooth muscle?
I ask this, because basically, there was a queston in the TBR bio:
The conduction velocity of APotentials along smooth muscle fiber is low because activation of:
1.) Na2+ channels
2.) Ca2+ channels
I put down Na2+ because AP velocity is dictated by Na2+ ions correct in smooth muscle, while contraction is mediated by Ca2+ ions....but apparently the answer is Ca2+ channels
From my understanding the ONLY cells I am aware of from physiology that can impact AP velocity are the AUTORHYTHMIC cells in your cardiac cells which have that funny current and whose depolarizations and triggering of Action potentials are mediated by the entry of Ca2+ ions...
So where did I go wrong?