- Joined
- Jan 6, 2004
- Messages
- 956
- Reaction score
- 16
Sureshot83 said:Yeah, for the first three days of classes, things were going great. There was obviously a lot of information in Anatomy, but with a bit of effort I could learn all the back muscles and components of vertebrae, etc. Biochem was also ok...our lecturers have been moving at a fast rate, but their notes are great and with some review it all becomes quite clear.
Then today we had our first embryology lecture. WTF!?!?
Why do we have to know this? What use could it possibly be? (Actually, that is a good question for a lot of the stuff we will bea learning.) There is so much detail in embryology and it all seems so hard to relate to it. What's so complicated about sperm, egg, uterus, amniotic sac, 9 months, BOOM! You have a baby! Why do we need to know about bilaminar and trilaminar embryos, primary and secondary yolks, and the cortical effect?
Does anyone (MS IIs maybe) have any idea of how much detail we need to know our embryology? We're using Langman's book - all the information in it CAN'T possibly be tested, so how do we know what's important?
I think some second years have said that for every class they took, they just studied using the prof's lecture handouts, their own notes from lecture, and review books like BRS or High Yield Anatomy/Biochem/Embryology/Physiology/etc.? Does this work? For what classes?
You had Moorman's lecture. 😀
I used BRS embryo. I never once opened Langmans.