- Joined
- Nov 21, 1998
- Messages
- 12,568
- Reaction score
- 6,967
At the June 2008 Annual Meeting of the American Medical Association (AMA), the House of Delegates adopted as policy Resolution 321, "Promotion of Better Pain Care." See attached.
This resolution asks that the AMA express its strong commitment to better access and delivery of quality pain care through the promotion of enhanced research, education and clinical practice in the field of pain medicine.
In addition, it asks the AMA to adopt a directive to encourage relevant specialties to collaborate in studying the following:
(1) the scope of practice and body of knowledge encompassed by the field of pain medicine;
(2) the adequacy of undergraduate, graduate and post graduate education in the principles and practice of the field of pain medicine, considering the current and anticipated medical need for the delivery of quality pain care;
(3) appropriate training and credentialing criteria for this multidisciplinary field of medical practice; and
(4) convening a meeting of interested parties to review all pertinent matters scientific and socioeconomic.
Fundamental to understanding these issues is addressing whether or not the practice of Pain Medicine constitutes the sub-specialty practice of medicine in its traditionally recognized "specialties of origin" (Anesthesia, Physiatry, Neurology, and Psychiatry) or if the practice of Pain Medicine has sufficiently evolved away from its specialties of origin to constitute an entirely new specialty?
Pain Medicine is currently recognized as a sub-specialty. Should it remain a sub-specialty or become its own specialty?
Please discuss.
This resolution asks that the AMA express its strong commitment to better access and delivery of quality pain care through the promotion of enhanced research, education and clinical practice in the field of pain medicine.
In addition, it asks the AMA to adopt a directive to encourage relevant specialties to collaborate in studying the following:
(1) the scope of practice and body of knowledge encompassed by the field of pain medicine;
(2) the adequacy of undergraduate, graduate and post graduate education in the principles and practice of the field of pain medicine, considering the current and anticipated medical need for the delivery of quality pain care;
(3) appropriate training and credentialing criteria for this multidisciplinary field of medical practice; and
(4) convening a meeting of interested parties to review all pertinent matters scientific and socioeconomic.
Fundamental to understanding these issues is addressing whether or not the practice of Pain Medicine constitutes the sub-specialty practice of medicine in its traditionally recognized "specialties of origin" (Anesthesia, Physiatry, Neurology, and Psychiatry) or if the practice of Pain Medicine has sufficiently evolved away from its specialties of origin to constitute an entirely new specialty?
Pain Medicine is currently recognized as a sub-specialty. Should it remain a sub-specialty or become its own specialty?
Please discuss.
Attachments
Last edited: