No. Surgeons like to operate. If they refuse, they usually have good reason. The risks are real and even without complications the outcomes may not be good. Surgery is not a cure all.
Thanks for the reply.
Believe me as a pain physician, I try to prevent surgery whenever possible. No one knows better than me that surgery is not a cure all.
However, private practice surgeons have a very good idea of what their common procedures pay, and a single level laminectomy on a medicare patient pays very little.
Spine surgeons don't make big money unless a surgical case involves hardware. They get much more excited about scheduling a L4-L5 PLIF than a L4-L5 lami.
Unfortunately at least every other a month, I see patient that is 85, had a stent placed 5 years ago, and has controlled hypertension. They also have severe one or two level lumbar stenosis, and have failed PT, meds, and multiple epidural steroid injections for their severe lumbar stenosis with claudication.
Our local surgeons won't lift a finger to help them and so I have been referring them to the closest university medical center which is 90 min away, and from what I hear back, most of these patients get their laminectomy. So I'm wondering how much of this situation comes from my local spine surgeons vs our local anesthesia group.
Someone is pussing out and punting these cases.
Again I'm not talking patients with severe pulmonary disease, CHF, renal failure etc.
Just 85 guys, or 85 yr old guys with a 5 year old cardaic stent.
My question is really this. What comorbid conditions would prevent anesthesia from doing a spinal epidural as anesthesia for a single level laminectomy on an elderly patient?