- Joined
- Nov 6, 2015
- Messages
- 27
- Reaction score
- 17
Anybody seeing good results after after the leads get pulled like that company reports? I have to say they work well when they’re in, but most of the time they go back to normal after I pull them.
Mixed bag. Data they present seems better than my results. I think for shoulder it was 50% of pts had relief at 1 yr?Anybody seeing good results after after the leads get pulled like that company reports? I have to say they work well when they’re in, but most of the time they go back to normal after I pull them.
Anybody seeing good results after after the leads get pulled like that company reports? I have to say they work well when they’re in, but most of the time they go back to normal after I pull them.
Youre doing PNS in lieu of MBB/RFA and getting better results after the 60 day pull?My cervical and lumbar generally do pretty well. Been doing these for 3 years, and I’ve only had to ablate maybe 2 patients where PNS for their spondy/multifidus pain wasn’t helpful for at least 6 months.
Somehow I’ve never had a shoulder or knee patient who I thought was a good candidate for this, but I would definitely consider in the right patient.
For more peripheral stuff my experience has definitely been mixed. Not having a permanent implant for these is a big limitation.
Their perm device is supposed to be released within the next year; hopefully it doesn’t suck.
Youre doing PNS in lieu of MBB/RFA and getting better results after the 60 day pull?
thats what I am thinking about, is doing a MBB to Reactiv8 move for these patients rather than RFAs because of the durability, and preventing worsening multifidus atrophy, but the downside is cost and implant in the body.I always do MBB first to confirm.
And of those who respond well I offer probably 15% a choice of RFA or PNS and they pick. The majority have relief for >6 months.
As an extreme example I actually just saw a guy I did a lumbar on ~2.5yrs ago who had 2 years of relief. He wanted to know if there was a permanent device I could implant, but I’ve been hesitant to use Nalu and I don’t do Reactiv8 so I referred him to somebody who does.
I offer sprint PNS as an option when I talk about rfa. I always do a mbb first as diagnostic. I’d say about 10% of my patients opt for sprint and at this point I’m beating the published average for pain relief with itYoure doing PNS in lieu of MBB/RFA and getting better results after the 60 day pull?
95% of my patients have MedicareHow are y'all getting this covered? What ICD10? Last I looked into it, no commercial coverage
Depends on if their pain is unilateral or bilateral. For a patient you would normally do l4-s1 rfa I would place them at the bilateral l5 vertebral level. I will stim on the table and if they are getting good coverage of where they normally have axial pain then I am happy. I like doing these for patients who have facet mediated pain at more than two levels.when you (@PMROralBoards and @au bon pain) are doing these cases, say for lumbar spine, are you doing bilateral leads?
when you (@PMROralBoards and @au bon pain) are doing these cases, say for lumbar spine, are you doing bilateral leads?
I usually do BL 2-lvl MBBs. When you guys do MBBs, are you testing one level? Can you explain your process for what level you're placing your leads at?
We use an online service where they call the patient to go over a checklist of questions and then we get the approval. The service is covered by Medicare. You could always consider sprint as a 60 day trial to include late responders that wouldn’t be captured by a nalu trial. If the pain comes back after lead pull, transition to nalu.I can no longer get these covered in my area even in my Medicare patients. They require a psych screen and we must state that the price of a 60 day trial is to determine appropriateness and eligibility of a permanent system. It’s like they copy and pasted the requirements for SCS. I haven’t gotten one approved in months. It’s ludicrous
I do the normal two level mbb. When I place the lead I just make an educated guess. I ask if it is covering their pain distribution. I try to have the stim level be lower than 50 for them to feel the distribution. If it’s higher then I will either adjust or change the level. If the pain is unilateral I will still do two leads but different levels rather than same level bilateral. I’ve also had good success with this on patients with an acdf for what it’s worth.I usually do BL 2-lvl MBBs. When you guys do MBBs, are you testing one level? Can you explain your process for what level you're placing your leads at?