Hey guys, I'm a 1st year student at the University of St Andrews studying medicine. I would like to introduce a program that I feel is very similar to the Irish programs that many people may not have heard of.
St Andrews recently started a program with the University of Edinburgh Medical School and the University of Alberta Faculty of Medicine for Canadians
The program had its first class in 2011 and I am part of the 2nd class.
Essentially the pathway is:
3 years of pre-clinical medicine at the University of St Andrews.
3 years of clinical medicine at the University of Edinburgh
4 months of electives at the University of Alberta
You graduate with a BSc (Hons) in Medical Sciences from St Andrews and a MB ChB (MD) from Edinburgh Medical School.
The cost of this program is comparable to the UCD/NUIG 6 year medical program assuming the CAD/EUR and CAD/Pound rates stay similar.
I won't recommend this program to anyone because this program is new, i'm still in my 1st year and no one has graduated yet so we don't have match statistics. Keep this in mind.
Pros/Cons
Pros:
4 month clinical elective at the University of Alberta hospitals (as it stands, it will consist of a 2 months elective after 3rd year and a 2 month elective during 6th year)
- The clinical elective will help you when you are applying to Canadian residency programs.
- The 2 months elective after 3rd year will probably involve teaching and some sort of guidance and teaching related to the MCCEE And NAC OSCE (probably some Canadian medicine related things, you learn the NHS in the UK which is irrelevant in Canada)
- The 2 month elective during 6th year is a clinical elective (you act as a 1st year resident and essentially show off your skills in the hopes of a recommendation letter, helps greatly in apps if you do well)
A special program coordinator (prof at Alberta, alum of St Andrews and Edinburgh) who is supposed to help us apply back to Canada
- We are supposed to receive guidance throughout our 6 years on the MCCEE, NAC OSCE and get help preparing for these exams
Good Course:
- You will do dissections throughout your first 2.5 years (On average about 1.5 hours a week throughout the semester)
- You learn a regional anatomy approach rather than systemic,
- Less PBL (not good for everyone), you get CBL once every 3 weeks
- You do 1 year of research with dissertation and possible poster/publication (half a year during your 3rd year at St Andrews and half a year during your 5th year at Edinburgh)
Prestigious university
-St Andrews is ranked 4th in the UK, and in the top 100 in the world, Prince William helps us with name recognition 😛
-Edinburgh's medical school is ranked 1st in Scotland, 1st in the UK for research (UK RAE) and 3rd in the UK overall (after Oxbridge), the university is ranked 21st in the world, lots of famous alumni (Darwin, Lister etc)
-It can't hurt to have a degree from a prestigious school if you can lol
Facilities are good:
-St Andrews built a new medical school in 2010 so facilities are brand new, the school is not huge however.
-The main teaching hospitals are Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital and Royal Hospital for Sick Children.
-The RIE was rebuilt at a new location in 2002 so it is also quite new and big (haven't been inside so can't really comment on anything except the outside)
Cons:
Not eligible for practice in the UK!!!
You will not be able to do your FY1 and postgraduate years in the UK meaning you are not licensed as a physician in the UK. I.E., your only option is essentially Canada or the US and possibly other countries. The A100 program at St Andrews offers you a shot at practicing in the UK however, it is a backup plan because preference will always be given to UK and EU residents.
Not proven
-We don't have match statistics. There really isn't much to doubt that people will match in similar rates back to Canada like Irish schools (RCSI,UCD). UK and Irish medical educations are very similar, both are english speaking and are standardized. However, without any proof, its more of a risk
No help for the US
-The medical education here does not teach toward any exam like the USMLE. We spend a lot of time on things that the USMLE covers briefly (like anatomy of leg, arm) but we spend no time on other things the USMLE covers in detail (quite a bit).
- Our coordinator doesn't seem to be very keen on helping us for the US. If asked, he will conceed that yes USA is a viable option but won't help us on the process. You are on your own if you want to apply to the US.
- If you want to apply to the US, you will need to take a year off just because of the US interview process, the added exams you need to take, ECFMG certification delay time and the fact that US residency starts before UK graduation. If you want an H1B immigration visa (meaning you want to become a US citizen eventually), you need to finish Step 3 which will mean you have to do it after you graduate medical school. If you want a J1 immigration visa (you are forced to leave the US for 2 years after graduation from residency) you don't need Step 3 to be finished.
Bad Course:
In my own personal opinion, i don't like how our pre-clinical medicine is taught. Apart from anatomy (which is just about the only thing structured), we get random lectures at random times of the week (we don't have a fixed schedule i.e. you might have class from Thursday 3-4pm one week but not the next however most classes due tend to find some sort of pattern (there is a tendency in 1st year for 4 lectures on monday and no practicals for example). All the other subjects other than anatomy like physiology, pathology, pharmacology are just taught randomly. There is no explanation why we learn local anesthetics in 1st semester and NSAIDS in 2nd. They will teach things to you so that they make sense (i.e., you will have learnt blood clotting and the meninges and liver function sometime before you learn NSAIDS), but I find i would probably prefer everything to be taught in blocks like: 8 weeks for anatomy, 8 weeks for path sort of thing.
To Apply:
To apply you need to go through the UCAS system which is the UK's system for applying for UK courses. You can also go directly through to St Andrews, if St Andrews is the only school you are applying to. I went through UCAS since i also applied to other UK schools.
You will need to take the UKCAT. St Andrews accepts IB and standard high school as well as AP. They will also look at SAT and SAT II scores if you offer them. You will also have to do an interview (in person or over Skype). In person means you have to go to St Andrews (really practical if you have other interviews, you can make a trip and go visit the schools before you accept).
UCAS code for this course is A990. There is another course called A100. This course allows you to practice in the UK assuming laws don't change. A100 is where you will compete with international students for a spot and you are sent to Manchester for your clinical years.
Overall, i don't think this program is any better or any worse than the Irish programs. It is just an alternative to consider.
In the 1st year they accepted 12 Canadians, 2nd year they accepted 15. I believe they are planning on a class of 20 eventually.
Most people in my year are coming straight from high school (all except 1). The majority of students at St Andrews are coming straight from high school or after a gap year mostly because of the 6 year program vs 5 and the 4 year programs offered to graduates. and the fact that St Andrews is really a university town.
If anyone has any questions, please feel free to ask.