D
deleted1064759
With the recent execution of Step 2 CS, is that unanimously a good thing for us? Or are there latent functions we still have to consider, like when Step 1 was made P/F?
Step II consisted of two parts: Clinical Knowledge (CK) and Clinical Skills (CS). CK is a multiple choice exam like the MCAT and Step I. CS, on the other hand, involved medical students interviewing mock patients and then writing up notes. Only the CS component has been canceled. Good riddance. One less hoop to jump through.Step 1 of Boards are now P/F.
So now Step 2 of Boards are permanently cancelled or am I misreading the situation?
USMLE Stuns Again: Clinical Skills Test Permanently Ended (medscape.com)
What will be impact for IMGs? I heard it was targeted for them. It wasn't there when my spouse took it (it was ECFMG though).Step II consisted of two parts: Clinical Knowledge (CK) and Clinical Skills (CS). CK is a multiple choice exam like the MCAT and Step I. CS, on the other hand, involved medical students interviewing mock patients and then writing up notes. Only the CS component has been canceled. Good riddance. One less hoop to jump through.
No, Step 2 CS itself will vanish without a trace.With the recent execution of Step 2 CS, is that unanimously a good thing for us? Or are there latent functions we still have to consider, like when Step 1 was made P/F?
And subjective scoring by the SPs.I've always understood that the CS exam was more of a logistical hassle than anything. Travel time / cost, etc. I think it was difficult for some students with language barriers so they are likely to benefit most by its discontinuation.
When admissions are subjective what's wrong with a test being subjective?And subjective scoring by the SPs.
The glorified OSCE that was Step 2 CS hit the trifecta of being costly, high stakes, and extremely subjective. Individuals who failed (which could cause career derailment) could not be given useful feedback, because the nature of the exam prevented it.When admissions are subjective what's wrong with a test being subjective?
I understand, it was a rhetorical question for adcoms who keeps pushing service hours are more important than scores and service is a very subjective thing 🙂The glorified OSCE that was Step 2 CS hit the trifecta of being costly, high stakes, and extremely subjective. Individuals who failed (which could cause career derailment) could not be given useful feedback, because the nature of the exam prevented it.
Admissions has subjective components, but it also uses more objective ones (i.e. MCAT and GPA) that correlate strongly with overall success. Apples to pears, IMHO.
After one reviews a thousand applications it doesn't seem so subjective.I understand, it was a rhetorical question for adcoms who keeps pushing service hours are more important than scores and service is a very subjective thing 🙂