Originally posted by crinkle
Hello everyone,
I was wondering if anyone knew how important Step II scores are for applications to the more competitive pediatric fellowship programs (e.g. heme-onc, allergy/immunology, cards)? I have a good step 1 score well above average, but a step 2 score that is around the mean score.
thanks for the help!
It's really not that important.
I sat on our fellowship ad com for a year and a half.
Had we reviewed your application ( with 10 attendings and 2 fellows on teh committee ) probably nobody would have even mentioned your low step 2 score.
Perhaps somebody would have brought it up, if there were other red flags , where some or more of us didn't want to interview you ( like a bad LOR )
It's a pretty small component of your overall application.
While fellowships are easy to get, the best fellowships ( like CHOP, Stanford, etc ) are still competative and fellowships like Cards, peds ER etc are more competative.
again, anybody can get a fellowship, but in many fields the job market narrows considerably after you finish, so please make sure you apply to the top programs !
It makes a huge difference whether you did your fellowship at a top program for many reasons
1. if you are required to produce research to sit for your specialty boards, many larger programs have better research
2. bigger, better quaternary programs offer a much better education.
I did neonatal-perinatal. I trained at the biggest program in USA.
We saw it all, since it's the biggest NICU in America.
I meet people that trained at smaller programs that have never even done an ECMO run, let alone managed a case almost every night on call, like we did. Some places transfer out all of their pre-op congenital hearts. That was amazing to think that some fellows did their entire training without managing complex congenital heart disease. Just amazing!
It makes a big difference where you train