- Joined
- Feb 1, 2019
- Messages
- 196
- Reaction score
- 551
Hey all! Considering my two options and wanted to get your opinion. Not sure where I want to be come residency, but leaning towards doing competitive specialties and have not ruled out academic medicine.
Keck
Pros:
Cons:
Stony Brook
Pros:
I think the question is which school sets me up better for matching into competitive specialties/does going to one school sacrifice the ability to match on the opposite coast? Thanks for your time.
Keck
Pros:
- Unranked P/F Preclinicals
- Prestige/Matching Clout better (true or no?)
- I'm from California
- LAC-USC offers top notch clinical training
- Good Research available
- Felt really good here on interview day. Vibed well.
Cons:
- Not in the nicest area
- Expensive!
- I have lived in Los Angeles for the past four years and a change might be good (tbh as long as I don't stay in southern California my entire career this is ok).
- Large class size. One of my big goals in med school is to find a mentor, because I felt I lacked that in undergrad. More difficulty?
Stony Brook
Pros:
- Something new. I've dreamed of living in New York for a while, and I love the prospect of visiting NYC. I also feel like I may want to do residency on the east coast, to experience that in my life.
- Match list punches above its "rank" in my opinion
- Small class size
- Good research, strong reputation in NY
- There's a top golf nearby and I really like top golf (jokes)
- IS tuition after the first year, making it about 20-30k cheaper for three years
- Sacrificing matching clout? Especially in the pass/fail era?
- H/P/F grading system during preclinicals
- I've always been a city lad and Stony Brook ain't a city
- No Mexican food
I think the question is which school sets me up better for matching into competitive specialties/does going to one school sacrifice the ability to match on the opposite coast? Thanks for your time.