Student Loan Debt

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
It's interesting to wonder where did the sense of entitlement come from. Were predents told they could make $300K out of school in the suburbs of NYC or Miami? Who told them that? If you are unwilling to make the sacrifices to make the income you want, I don't think anyone feels bad that you are stuck making $150K w/ $500K debt.

Exactly. It all comes down to priorities. Do you want to sacrifice you dream location for a few years to make the kind of money you need to pay off the debt, or are you happy making less than the median salary, paying a high cost of living, but being in the big city with all the luxuries and drag out paying back loans for as long as possible
 
Exactly. It all comes down to priorities. Do you want to sacrifice you dream location for a few years to make the kind of money you need to pay off the debt, or are you happy making less than the median salary, paying a high cost of living, but being in the big city with all the luxuries and drag out paying back loans for as long as possible
Or maybe we should have a system where when we leave higher education we don't have to leave our friends and family behind to work in a city we don't want to live in for years in order to justify crippling debt. Have some compassion.
 
FACT: Majority of dentists don’t make a great income and are not rich.
This is true and was also true in the the past. Practicing dentistry won't make you rich. This is why you see a lot of dentists, who graduated 30+ years ago and are in their late 50s/early 60s, are still working to save for their retirements. If you just do dentistry and don’t invest your money in anything, that'll help you earn passive income later on, you will end up retiring with just a house, which you should be able to pay off, a car…and nothing else.
 
Last edited:

Members do not see ads. Register today.

This is true and was also true in the the past. Practicing dentistry won't make you rich. This is why you see a lot of dentists, who graduated 30+ years ago and are in their late 50s/early 60s, are still working to save for their retirements. If you just do dentistry and don’t invest your money in anything, that'll help you earn passive income later on, you will end up retiring with just a house, which you should be able to pay off, a car…and nothing else.
And social security, if it’s still solvent. If it is, that could be anywhere between $1,000 to $6,000 a month in future money. The current maximum is about $3,500 a month - for six figure income earners at age 70 and with 35 years work history.


Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile
 
And social security, if it’s still solvent. If it is, that could be anywhere between $1,000 to $6,000 a month in future money. The current maximum is about $3,500 a month - for six figure income earners at age 70 and with 35 years work history.
If social security will still exist when I retire.....but I wouldn’t count on the government to help with my retirement. The government is never good at managing anything. It’s always better to do everything that you can to help yourself and your family while you are still young and healthy. $3500/month is definitely better than nothing but I need a lot more than that. My property tax alone is $2000/month. Even if I downgrade to live in a $700k condo here in CA, it will still be almost $1000/month because I will have to pay other expenses such as HOA fees + maintenances.
 
Last edited:
If social security will still exist when I retire.....but I wouldn’t count on the government to help with my retirement. The government is never good at managing anything. It’s always better to do everything that you can to help yourself and your family while you are still young and healthy. $3500/month is definitely better than nothing but I need a lot more than that. My property tax alone is $2000/month. Even if I downgrade to live in a $700k condo here in CA, it will still be almost $1000/month because I will have to pay other expenses such as HOA fees + maintenances.
Never understood these insane expenses on the coast cities. I live in new 3,000 sft home in a downtown with a 15 years tax abatement (0 real estates taxes) - and prices increase every year. HOA is about $200 a month. Drive to work is less than 10 mins. People are way nicer, 4 seasons weather, food scene is way better and less saturated for dentists. Anyways, with SALT taxes being capped, there is mass exodus of people leaving New York, Washington and California... over 60,000 people are moving from New York to Florida alone every year.


Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile
 
Or maybe we should have a system where when we leave higher education we don't have to leave our friends and family behind to work in a city we don't want to live in for years in order to justify crippling debt. Have some compassion.

This sense of entitlement is mind boggling.
 
This sense of entitlement is mind boggling.
Not wanting a system where every single adult berates you your entire life about how you have to go to college and you go, are crippled with life long compounding debt, can't get married, can't have kids, can't buy a home, etc. and are then told to leave your friends and family behind to move to some city you have no desire to live in for years just to make a dent in your debt is somehow entitlement? Wrap your mind around $1.7 trillion in educational debt. Your lack of empathy is mind boggling.
 
Not wanting a system where every single adult berates you your entire life about how you have to go to college and you go, are crippled with life long compounding debt, can't get married, can't have kids, can't buy a home, etc. and are then told to leave your friends and family behind to move to some city you have no desire to live in for years just to make a dent in your debt is somehow entitlement? Wrap your mind around $1.7 trillion in educational debt. Your lack of empathy is mind boggling.

Why do you feel that you are owed anything? Why should anyone else have to pay for you to have those things? How much are you willing to sacrifice and give up so someone else can have those things?

You are grossly over exaggerating. No body forced you to do anything. If you made poor choices without doing any research and blindly listened to other people then that is on you.

The high debt is exactly the result of the entitlements you are advocating for. We guaranteed loans for everybody regardless of whether or not they should have actually gone to college and whether or not they were studying something worthwhile because people thought it should be an entitlement.
 
Why do you feel that you are owed anything? Why should anyone else have to pay for you to have those things? How much are you willing to sacrifice and give up so someone else can have those things?
Because I'm an American, and I believe the country should do what's best for Americans. When my neighbor's house burns down, my tax dollars go to the fire department who will put it out, and I'm happy about that. I could be mad our taxes go to roads I don't drive on or the police when I don't commit crimes, but I'm glad they go to those things because I care about my country. I believe my generation, who now is chained with $1.7 trillion (you read that right) in educational debt was owed a better path. Something is wrong here. Why do you not care about your struggling fellow Americans? When you see your generation collectively drowning in debt, you realize they were owed something better.
You are grossly over exaggerating. No body forced you to do anything. If you made poor choices without doing any research and blindly listened to other people then that is on you.
Please go see my previous posts explaining this.
The high debt is exactly the result of the entitlements you are advocating for. We guaranteed loans for everybody regardless of whether or not they should have actually gone to college and whether or not they were studying something worthwhile because people thought it should be an entitlement.
Again, see my previous posts. The debt was resulted from kids who trusted their elders who all told them an education would lead them to a bright future. They thought they were framing their futures, instead they got riddled with debt and a salary that doesn't justify it. When an entire generation was so clearly effected, maybe there's more too it than just scoffing at them for "entitlement".
 
You are grossly over exaggerating. No body forced you to do anything. If you made poor choices without doing any research and blindly listened to other people then that is on you.

The high debt is exactly the result of the entitlements you are advocating for. We guaranteed loans for everybody regardless of whether or not they should have actually gone to college and whether or not they were studying something worthwhile because people thought it should be an entitlement.
That's not what I'm saying at all. I'm saying the reason the scam works is because they're offering guaranteed half million dollar loans to kids for an education in a society where education is pushed heavily. Schools know kids are too naive to realize what large debt means so they continually jack up the prices in a predatory manner because the government will fund it regardless. Asking me the age for who should be able to take out half million dollar loans in loans guaranteed I view as a false premise because I don't believe any education should ever cost that much. The educational debt in this country is larger than the entire GDP of Russia at $1.5 trillion. Clearly this system is corrupt. Nobody my age is having children, nobody can buy homes, nobody is getting married and debt is a leading cause for all of that. When you see your friends moving back home because they're riddled with educational debt along with the things I just mentioned, you see how these people were manipulated. The "you should have known better" mentality is such a smug attitude. You weren't in their shoes. I was. I can totally relate to why they did this. They know next to nothing about how crippling compounding debt is and are pushed by everyone to go into higher education.
 
No, nobody is entitled to anything. Things don’t come from nothing. Somebody else has sacrifice and give something up for you to have those entitlements. If you feel that way then what are you personally sacrificing and giving up to make sure your fellow Americans can have those entitlements?
I don’t feel bad for people who blindly took out student loans and didn’t do any research into picking a career field that would allow them pay it back.
 
No, nobody is entitled to anything. Things don’t come from nothing. Somebody else has sacrifice and give something up for you to have those entitlements. If you feel that way then what are you personally sacrificing and giving up to make sure your fellow Americans can have those entitlements?
I don’t feel bad for people who blindly took out student loans and didn’t do any research into picking a career field that would allow them pay it back.
Are you entitled to the fire department coming when your house burns down, the police coming when you're being robbed, or roads being paved? In America, a country where the government is suppose to care about its people, of course you are. If kids, with no work experience or concept of money are enslaved by debt, then that will decimate our country. There's more people out there than just you. Perhaps its time to stop looking at fellow Americans as dollar signs and view them as extended family. If you do that, you'll see that my generation having $1.7 trillion in educational debt is an absolute abomination. Schools shouldn't be entitled to charge their financially illiterate students ~100k a year and raise tuition 10% just because they can. That's the real entitlement problem.
 
Are you entitled to the fire department coming when your house burns down, the police coming when you're being robbed, or roads being paved? In America, a country where the government is suppose to care about its people, of course you are. If kids, with no work experience or concept of money are enslaved by debt, then that will decimate our country. There's more people out there than just you. Perhaps its time to stop looking at fellow Americans as dollar signs and view them as extended family. If you do that, you'll see that my generation having $1.7 trillion in educational debt is an absolute abomination. Schools shouldn't be entitled to charge their financially illiterate students ~100k a year and raise tuition 10% just because they can. That's the real entitlement problem.

I’m in your generation. I’m not entitled to police or first responders, I pay for them to do that through my taxes. I pay for the roads I drive on through taxes. You are looking at your fellow Americans as dollar signs as you demand that they pay for more and more stuff for you and others that lack personal accountability. Again, if you feel so strongly about your fellow Americans what are you personally giving up and sacrificing so they can have those entitlements?
 
I’m in your generation. I’m not entitled to police or first responders, I pay for them to do that through my taxes. I pay for the roads I drive on through taxes.
My point is that we are paying for other people, many of whom are less fortunate and pay little in taxes, to use services so we can function as a society. That's a good thing. They are entitled to these services because they are Americans. Period. Functioning societies have governments that help take care of their people. If they don't, what's the point of having a government? My point is, the government needs to step in and put an end to this student loan madness in order to save our generation.
You are looking at your fellow Americans as dollar signs as you demand that they pay for more and more stuff for you and others that lack personal accountability. Again, if you feel so strongly about your fellow Americans what are you personally giving up and sacrificing so they can have those entitlements?
I don't know what you're talking about. I believe the government should order colleges to cosign their student loans so that if a student goes in default, the universities have to pay. That's the only way, in my opinion, loans are moral when both people are on the hook. Another solution would be having the government cap how much a school can charge and how much they can raise tuition. I haven't asked for anyone to pay for anything. This will actually be cheaper as there will be less government forgiveness so tax dollars won't be needed to pay for people like Mike Meru's loans, around one million of which the tax payers pay for. It's honestly amazing the current system is even legal.

Millions and millions of people our age our broke because of student loans. As a result, they are delaying vital life processes like having families that were automatic for our parents and grand parents. According to gallup, the percentage of Americans who want children hasn't changed in 25 years, but because of rising debt, fewer and fewer children are being born and America's middle class cannot replace itself. The economic effects will be profound if the government doesn't step in. I'm asking for the government to do something not because I need it, I'll only have around 200k debt which I'll have no problems paying off, but because our country as a whole needs it desperately.
 
My point is that we are paying for other people, many of whom are less fortunate and pay little in taxes, to use services so we can function as a society. That's a good thing. They are entitled to these services because they are Americans. Period. Functioning societies have governments that help take care of their people. If they don't, what's the point of having a government? My point is, the government needs to step in and put an end to this student loan madness in order to save our generation.

I don't know what you're talking about. I believe the government should order colleges to cosign their student loans so that if a student goes in default, the universities have to pay. That's the only way, in my opinion, loans are moral when both people are on the hook. Another solution would be having the government cap how much a school can charge and how much they can raise tuition. I haven't asked for anyone to pay for anything. This will actually be cheaper as there will be less government forgiveness so tax dollars won't be needed to pay for people like Mike Meru's loans, around one million of which the tax payers pay for. It's honestly amazing the current system is even legal.

Millions and millions of people our age our broke because of student loans. As a result, they are delaying vital life processes like having families that were automatic for our parents and grand parents. According to gallup, the percentage of Americans who want children hasn't changed in 25 years, but because of rising debt, fewer and fewer children are being born and America's middle class cannot replace itself. The economic effects will be profound if the government doesn't step in. I'm asking for the government to do something not because I need it, I'll only have around 200k debt which I'll have no problems paying off, but because our country as a whole needs it desperately.

I’m gonna end the conversation here. Nothing you said makes much sense. Most all universities are government run, even private ones need government grants.Their money comes from the tax payers. So the tax payers are the ones paying for those defaults.

I’ll bet money you’ll change your tune in a few years when get out and start working and people want you to subsidize their poor decisions.
 
I’m gonna end the conversation here. Nothing you said makes much sense. Most all universities are government run, even private ones need government grants.Their money comes from the tax payers. So the tax payers are the ones paying for those defaults.

I’ll bet money you’ll change your tune in a few years when get out and start working and people want you to subsidize their poor decisions.
You don't understand what I'm saying. I agree. If the universities are on the hook for paying for defaults you know what they'll do? Lower prices. Once the universities have skin in the game, they'll have to lower prices. They'd rather use their money to pay their overpaid administrators rather than burn it to pay for defaults. It's not about having the government grants pay for it. It's about lowering the prices. What's hard to get about that? You also don't understand what will happen to the economy when an entire generation cannot have children because of debt. If we have an entire generation that can't pay for anything and lose our middle class, we're in trouble economically. If we don't fix this mess, our entire country will be hurt.
 
Their money comes from the tax payers. So the tax payers are the ones paying for those defaults.
That’s the problem in this country. Tax payers have always been let down by bad leadership that the majority have elected. A leadership (President and Congress) that did not do everything in their power to do what’s best for the tax payers. You can be a proud tax payer, but were you ok with your money being used to bail out banks that caused the 2008 recession? What about when your taxes was spent in wars that were proven to be unnecessary? How about on building a wall on the Mexico border? The point is - tax payers money going to for-profit and state schools did not come with good checks and balances, just like almost everything else the government does with the tax money. So yes, the student default will get worse and one way or the other, this whole debt crisis will reach a tipping point and crash - at the expense of the tax payers. We have shot ourselves in the foot before, and when the bubble bursts on student loans - we will shoot ourselves in the foot again.




Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile
 
Not wanting a system where every single adult berates you your entire life about how you have to go to college and you go, are crippled with life long compounding debt, can't get married, can't have kids, can't buy a home, etc. and are then told to leave your friends and family behind to move to some city you have no desire to live in for years just to make a dent in your debt is somehow entitlement? Wrap your mind around $1.7 trillion in educational debt. Your lack of empathy is mind boggling.

It's called sacrifice. Just because you want something doesn't mean you should get it unless you have the means to do so. So yes, it's the sense of entitlement. That money came from somewhere, if an area needed a dentist you didn't want to go to but you were forced to, it's a reallocation of labor supply to meet population demands.

Because I'm an American, and I believe the country should do what's best for Americans. When my neighbor's house burns down, my tax dollars go to the fire department who will put it out, and I'm happy about that. I could be mad our taxes go to roads I don't drive on or the police when I don't commit crimes, but I'm glad they go to those things because I care about my country. I believe my generation, who now is chained with $1.7 trillion (you read that right) in educational debt was owed a better path. Something is wrong here. Why do you not care about your struggling fellow Americans? When you see your generation collectively drowning in debt, you realize they were owed something better.

Please go see my previous posts explaining this.

Again, see my previous posts. The debt was resulted from kids who trusted their elders who all told them an education would lead them to a bright future. They thought they were framing their futures, instead they got riddled with debt and a salary that doesn't justify it. When an entire generation was so clearly effected, maybe there's more too it than just scoffing at them for "entitlement".

Yea, taxes that go towards public services are not for your direct benefit, but to ensure that social stability and order is maintained. Roads are maintained to facilitate commerce/transportation system, not so your ride is smooth. Fire departments put fires out to save people, but more importantly, make sure the fire doesn't damage adjacent structures/property.

People suffer because of the decisions that they made. They did not think of their decisions through, and as a result, they are enslaved through debt. That easy money did not come out of thin air, and just because they did not think their decisions through, why should they be absolved of their responsiblities. So no, they were not held at gunpoint in making this decision, and "pressure" to get a college degree doesn't mean you should get a useless degree that has no power to make money to payback that degree. People who succumb to the "pressure" of getting a college degree because it's the demand of family/peers deserve what they get for not making an objective decision. There is no shame in trade schools or other professions that can make a good amount of money without a formal college degree.

My point is that we are paying for other people, many of whom are less fortunate and pay little in taxes, to use services so we can function as a society. That's a good thing. They are entitled to these services because they are Americans. Period. Functioning societies have governments that help take care of their people. If they don't, what's the point of having a government? My point is, the government needs to step in and put an end to this student loan madness in order to save our generation.

I don't know what you're talking about. I believe the government should order colleges to cosign their student loans so that if a student goes in default, the universities have to pay. That's the only way, in my opinion, loans are moral when both people are on the hook. Another solution would be having the government cap how much a school can charge and how much they can raise tuition. I haven't asked for anyone to pay for anything. This will actually be cheaper as there will be less government forgiveness so tax dollars won't be needed to pay for people like Mike Meru's loans, around one million of which the tax payers pay for. It's honestly amazing the current system is even legal.

Millions and millions of people our age our broke because of student loans. As a result, they are delaying vital life processes like having families that were automatic for our parents and grand parents. According to gallup, the percentage of Americans who want children hasn't changed in 25 years, but because of rising debt, fewer and fewer children are being born and America's middle class cannot replace itself. The economic effects will be profound if the government doesn't step in. I'm asking for the government to do something not because I need it, I'll only have around 200k debt which I'll have no problems paying off, but because our country as a whole needs it desperately.

The point of government is highly debatable. In the very minimum, government should be stabilizing force to provide investor and consumer confidence to promote economic growth. Once you start tacking on more and more, the more control the government has over people's lives. I believe this is where the divide exists. I believe in that if you don't work, you don't eat. It's harsh, but fair. Support systems/welfare states should exist as a temporary safety net, not a multigenerational crutch, to get back on their feet and become a contributing member of society.

You have a point though. Free and easy money has led to ever increasing tuition costs. This has to end at some point, because we're all paying for this in one way or another.

I don't believe that being an American alone entitles you to anything more than the freedom to pursue life, liberty, and happiness. The systems of government that we have allows the social stability that enables the aforementioned principles. There's a fine line between regulation for the good of the people and regulation for ceding of power to the government. The individual is free to succeed or fail. Life isn't fair, and not everyone is a winner. What you're saying reeks of some kind of alarmist dogma that I can't verbally quantify.
 
It's called sacrifice. Just because you want something doesn't mean you should get it unless you have the means to do so. So yes, it's the sense of entitlement. That money came from somewhere, if an area needed a dentist you didn't want to go to but you were forced to, it's a reallocation of labor supply to meet population demands.
I agree. Dentists in 500k debt absolutely should go to areas where they'll receive a higher salary to pay off their debt. What I'm saying is the system shouldn't exist where the only way to justify the cost of higher education is to go some rural place you have no desire to live in. I don't think wanting to reform a corrupt system is entitlement. In fact, it will cost the tax payer less as fewer people will default on loans.
Yea, taxes that go towards public services are not for your direct benefit, but to ensure that social stability and order is maintained. Roads are maintained to facilitate commerce/transportation system, not so your ride is smooth. Fire departments put fires out to save people, but more importantly, make sure the fire doesn't damage adjacent structures/property.

People suffer because of the decisions that they made. They did not think of their decisions through, and as a result, they are enslaved through debt. That easy money did not come out of thin air, and just because they did not think their decisions through, why should they be absolved of their responsiblities. So no, they were not held at gunpoint in making this decision, and "pressure" to get a college degree doesn't mean you should get a useless degree that has no power to make money to payback that degree. People who succumb to the "pressure" of getting a college degree because it's the demand of family/peers deserve what they get for not making an objective decision. There is no shame in trade schools or other professions that can make a good amount of money without a formal college degree.
I believe the government getting involved in ending the predatory borrower-lender relationship falls under maintaining order. The fire here is insurmountable student loan debt, and the government can stop it from spreading. I don't believe people in this country should be allowed to just do whatever they want under the auspices of freedom. If they could, why can't you sell your own organs or shoot heroine? The fact of the matter is those degrade you and harm you and have greater ramifications on society as a whole. In the same way, allowing naive students to en masse fall pray to mountains of student loan debt that will hold them back from buying a car, get married, etc, should not be permitted as they destroy their lives and will affect society as a whole.
You have a point though. Free and easy money has led to ever increasing tuition costs. This has to end at some point, because we're all paying for this in one way or another.
This is key. While I respectfully disagree with you on many of the other details, I think most of us understand free money is how prices have soared the way they have.
I don't believe that being an American alone entitles you to anything more than the freedom to pursue life, liberty, and happiness. The systems of government that we have allows the social stability that enables the aforementioned principles. There's a fine line between regulation for the good of the people and regulation for ceding of power to the government. The individual is free to succeed or fail. Life isn't fair, and not everyone is a winner. What you're saying reeks of some kind of alarmist dogma that I can't verbally quantify.
I'm not a socialist. I don't believe people are entitled to free housing, free college, etc. But, as you said, the government needs to be there to maintain social stability. Well, when an entire generation of students fall pray to corrupt lenders and are crippled for the rest of their lives, we need the government to come in and stop it as it will have ramifications on the entire country. Moreover, I don't believe I'm being "alarmist". There's a reason this is called the student loan "crisis" on the news. It's because it is a legitimate crisis. There is $1.7 trillion of student loan debt for goodness sake.
 
That’s the problem in this country. Tax payers have always been let down by bad leadership that the majority have elected. A leadership (President and Congress) that did not do everything in their power to do what’s best for the tax payers. You can be a proud tax payer, but were you ok with your money being used to bail out banks that caused the 2008 recession? What about when your taxes was spent in wars that were proven to be unnecessary? How about on building a wall on the Mexico border? The point is - tax payers money going to for-profit and state schools did not come with good checks and balances, just like almost everything else the government does with the tax money. So yes, the student default will get worse and one way or the other, this whole debt crisis will reach a tipping point and crash - at the expense of the tax payers. We have shot ourselves in the foot before, and when the bubble bursts on student loans - we will shoot ourselves in the foot again.




Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile

Yeah agreed, that’s why I don’t think the answer is more government. They do a terrible job at pretty much everything and are far less effective than free market competition. My vote would be for government to get out of student lending. The banks certainly aren’t going to lend anyone 100k for a degree in underwater basket weaving and these useless programs will have to go away.
 
I agree. Dentists in 500k debt absolutely should go to areas where they'll receive a higher salary to pay off their debt. What I'm saying is the system shouldn't exist where the only way to justify the cost of higher education is to go some rural place you have no desire to live in. I don't think wanting to reform a corrupt system is entitlement. In fact, it will cost the tax payer less as fewer people will default on loans.

I believe the government getting involved in ending the predatory borrower-lender relationship falls under maintaining order. The fire here is insurmountable student loan debt, and the government can stop it from spreading. I don't believe people in this country should be allowed to just do whatever they want under the auspices of freedom. If they could, why can't you sell your own organs or shoot heroine? The fact of the matter is those degrade you and harm you and have greater ramifications on society as a whole. In the same way, allowing naive students to en masse fall pray to mountains of student loan debt that will hold them back from buying a car, get married, etc, should not be permitted as they destroy their lives and will affect society as a whole.

This is key. While I respectfully disagree with you on many of the other details, I think most of us understand free money is how prices have soared the way they have.

I'm not a socialist. I don't believe people are entitled to free housing, free college, etc. But, as you said, the government needs to be there to maintain social stability. Well, when an entire generation of students fall pray to corrupt lenders and are crippled for the rest of their lives, we need the government to come in and stop it as it will have ramifications on the entire country. Moreover, I don't believe I'm being "alarmist". There's a reason this is called the student loan "crisis" on the news. It's because it is a leg1itimate crisis. There is $1.7 trillion of student loan debt for goodness sake.

I think it's a good thing that dentists who take on 500k have to go to underserved areas. I see it as a positive externality and forces a more even distribution of dentists. Not everyone should be in the city. Dentists who default lose their license, so in a way, it's wage slavery.

I agree that money should not be as freely available for degrees that don't have the potential of making money to payback the loan taken out for the degree.... and yes, there are useless degrees out there, contrary to what some people believe. I don't think society needs to pay to enrich an individual, it should pay to create individuals who have functional value. On a controversial note, if people were allowed to sell their organs, we might see less of a shortage of organs. That's why there's a lucrative black market out of the US. People should not be permitted to destroy their lives IF it affects other people or make society pay for their self destruction.

Yes, a student loan bubble exists. I think we differ in that I don't believe those that are currently suffering with excessive loans need some kind of forbearance/relief. I think the touchy subject here is that not all professions are worth the same. 300k to produce a PhD in gender studies v. 300k to produce a physician. Their ability to pay and contributions are drastically different and an economist would probably be better in determining the value of how much each one should be allowed to borrow. Yes, this might close certain fields for the pursuit of the rich, but there needs to be a point where society will only pay for the potential value generated by that specific field of study.

You may not be a socialist, but there's a level of subjectiveness in seeking a eudaimonic society through socialist/government means. That makes you socialist-leaning. This goes back to what the role of government should be in society. I don't think more government is good and government-enabled self destruction is even worse.
 
think it's a good thing that dentists who take on 500k have to go to underserved areas. I see it as a positive externality and forces a more even distribution of dentists. Not everyone should be in the city. Dentists who default lose their license, so in a way, it's wage slavery.
I disagree, because most who should be going to underserved areas do not and will rely on government forgiveness programs. In theory, I wish everyone who went to NYU went to rural Kansas. Practically, most won't. Even those who eventually pay their loans without forgiveness will probably have fewer if, any children. I view that as a net negative for society.
People should not be permitted to destroy their lives IF it affects other people or make society pay for their self destruction.
When an entire generation is drowning in debt and cannot have kids, I view that as destroying society. I'll give you a real life example. Many states have wisely banned or limited pay day loans. Why? Because studies show they target the young and poor and destroy their lives. I think the federal government needs to step in and do something about the predatory student loans like state government's did with payday loans. I don't care if desperate people lose the "freedom" to take out loans with a 300% interest rate just like I don't care if they lose the freedom to shoot heroine. At the end of the day, society is greater by eliminating this.
You may not be a socialist, but there's a level of subjectiveness in seeking a eudaimonic society through socialist/government means. That makes you socialist-leaning. This goes back to what the role of government should be in society. I don't think more government is good and government-enabled self destruction is even worse.
My family lived in communist Eastern Europe. I know what socialism is and asking the government to step in when a vulnerable class of people are being taken advantage of isn't it. I'm not asking for total loan forgiveness or college being free. I'm generally in favor of total freedom for people. However, when an entire generation collectively has $1.7 trillion in education debt and growing, it's time for the government to step in. Again, not asking for loan forgiveness or free college. Just make the lender-borrower relationship between students and colleges fair. Teddy Roosevelt busted trusts for the benefit of the economy and society to combat corporate concentration. The government stepping in to stop the student loan crisis is certainly within their purview.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
However, when an entire generation collectively has $1.7 trillion in education debt and growing, it's time for the government to step in.
2019 GDP By Country in US $.

1. United States (GDP: 21.41 trillion)
2. China (GDP: 15.54 trillion)
3. Japan (GDP: 5.36 trillion)
4. Germany (GDP: 4.42 trillion)
5. India (GDP: 3.16 trillion)
6. France (GDP: 3.06 trillion)
7. United Kingdom (GDP: 3.02 trillion)
8. Italy (GDP: 2.26 trillion)
9. Brazil (GDP: 2.26 trillion)
10. Canada (GDP: 1.91 trillion)
11. US Student Loans (1.7 trillion and climbing)

The US Department of Education issues $100-110 billion in student loans every year. In 10 years, and with compounding interest, the debt will pass Canada, Italy, and Brazil’s GDP - who have a combined population of 320 million between them - while US student loans are carried by 44 million Americans.



Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile
 
2019 GDP By Country in US $.

1. United States (GDP: 21.41 trillion)
2. China (GDP: 15.54 trillion)
3. Japan (GDP: 5.36 trillion)
4. Germany (GDP: 4.42 trillion)
5. India (GDP: 3.16 trillion)
6. France (GDP: 3.06 trillion)
7. United Kingdom (GDP: 3.02 trillion)
8. Italy (GDP: 2.26 trillion)
9. Brazil (GDP: 2.26 trillion)
10. Canada (GDP: 1.91 trillion)
11. US Student Loans (1.7 trillion and climbing)

The US Department of Education issues $100-110 billion in student loans every year. In 10 years, and with compounding interest, the debt will pass Canada, Italy, and Brazil’s GDP - who have a combined population of 320 million between them - while US student loans are carried by 44 million Americans.



Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile
1574930470205.gif
 
I disagree, because most who should be going to underserved areas do not and will rely on government forgiveness programs. In theory, I wish everyone who went to NYU went to rural Kansas. Practically, most won't. Even those who eventually pay their loans without forgiveness will probably have fewer if, any children. I view that as a net negative for society.

The only way to force people to go is to get rid of IBR. That way people have no crutch and they will need to go to an underserved area to make lots of $$. Children, at a minimum, are required to replace the aging workforce. I will agree that it's negative to a certain extent. The value of children rests more on the cultural value systems that are instilled in kids these days. The society and its values will either encourage the child to become a productive member of society or a chronic leech on the system (jailed, welfare, etc...). So, more children doesn't mean better if you're raising a generation of leeches, as a bare minimum, they need to be able to do some form of labor to contribute to society, from sign spinners to physicians. I am not so sure whether this generation is resilient enough to overcome all the challenges they come to face, or whether they will depend more and more on government to provide for them. Again, this goes back to whether you crank out children that are productive or societal leeches. If you needed more children, I'm sure there's ways to incentivize lower/lower-middle class families who are not saddled with debt to produce more children to become future daylaborers. It all really depends on the future needs of society. Are we going to need an army of college graduates, or will we get by with automation and unskilled labor?

When an entire generation is drowning in debt and cannot have kids, I view that as destroying society. I'll give you a real life example. Many states have wisely banned or limited pay day loans. Why? Because studies show they target the young and poor and destroy their lives. I think the federal government needs to step in and do something about the predatory student loans like state government's did with payday loans. I don't care if desperate people lose the "freedom" to take out loans with a 300% interest rate just like I don't care if they lose the freedom to shoot heroine. At the end of the day, society is greater by eliminating this.

It isn't that they cannot have kids, it's that this generation is realizing that the expectation of having kids is an outdated way of thinking (at least in their minds). With respect to payday loans, they have their legitimate uses. When there is a market demand for services such as payday loans, payday loans serve as a bridge for the underbanked. You can ban all you want, but that only drives legitimate businesses to go underground (just like with the excessive taxation of marijuana in California). The market(s) will find a way to correct these market insufficiencies even if it isn't seen as fair. And yes, I do dabble in alternative finance, so I know what it means when lending institutions won't lend to people/businesses who need it the most. You won't get rid of it by eliminating it, you just create a black market. I won't even go into the heroin part, because that's a touchy subject that 's probably going to offend a lot of people regardless of the stance taken.

My family lived in communist Eastern Europe. I know what socialism is and asking the government to step in when a vulnerable class of people are being taken advantage of isn't it. I'm not asking for total loan forgiveness or college being free. I'm generally in favor of total freedom for people. However, when an entire generation collectively has $1.7 trillion in education debt and growing, it's time for the government to step in. Again, not asking for loan forgiveness or free college. Just make the lender-borrower relationship between students and colleges fair. Teddy Roosevelt busted trusts for the benefit of the economy and society to combat corporate concentration. The government stepping in to stop the student loan crisis is certainly within their purview.

Yes, I think we can agree that this excessive free flow of money needs to stop for degrees that don't have a chance of paying back these loans. That is an unsustainable public policy. What I do not favor is forgiving all the loans that have been disbursed. People should pay for the damage that has been encouraged by poor public policy because ultimately, it's the borrower's responsibility.
 
The only way to force people to go is to get rid of IBR. That way people have no crutch and they will need to go to an underserved area to make lots of $$. Children, at a minimum, are required to replace the aging workforce.
IBR is not going anywhere, and in fact - there are bills in Congress which aim to expand it or be similar to IBR. IBR is a big business, it allows the debt servicers to shackle borrowers with more debt for longer period of time, so they will continue to lobby for it at all cost. So young new grads will continue to flow into urban areas and saturate existing markets even more. There is no strong incentive for them to live in rural areas - so many will have to settle for carrying their student loans for 30+ years, essentially until they retire or beyond retirement. I personally know dentists who are still paying their student loans from 25+ years ago - not common, but they are out there. So, the ball and chain will be even bigger for today’s pre-dents when they finish DS.

Also, enough children are not being born in this country to replace the aging workforce anytime soon. In 2018, almost 70,000 less kids were born than the previous year - the lowest in history, and the trend will get worse every year for the foreseeable future. With 10,000 baby boomers retiring every day, there were about 10,000 child births in 2018. We only have immigrants increasing our population - and they account for large number of the births. People entering retirement age will surpass child births in our lifetime - it already has in many parts of the world. So yes, the aging workforce - specially in rural areas will just have to fade away without a young workforce to replace them. In my home state, more than half of the 88 counties are losing population.


Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile
 
Top Bottom