Last edited:
Um, what? I disagree completely, especially if your gpa is as low as the OPs. An SMP will clearly convey your ability to do well in Med School whereas a MS in science doesn't guarantee much of anything.If you can put up a high MCAT you probably don't need a SMP. You're better off doing a science MS with med related research or an MPH with some clinical volunteering if you need to boost your grades. What you learn there will be more useful in your MD career, the classes will cover advanced material and demonstrate you have better study habits than when you were undergrad and the letters from this route are probably going to be more personalized.
Like the OPSMPs are for people with subaverage grades who haven't mastered the basics well enough to understand the MCAT (and by extension Medical School) or who come from unaccredited undergrad programs.
Um, what? I disagree completely, especially if your gpa is as low as the OPs. An SMP will clearly convey your ability to do well in Med School whereas a MS in science doesn't guarantee much of anything.
Like the OP
If OP can't get through the MCAT then sure he might want to think about an SMP. If he is able to put up a decent MCAT and clearly knows the material why screw around with Ochem and Physics (provided they're already on his transcript?) Taking advanced courses and getting As is the way to go.
A 3.0 GPA is only subaverage for med school. We also don't know his grade splits. If he got As in his med prereqs the 3.0 probably isn't fatal. Adcoms are less likely to care about a C- in Greek History freshman year than a D in senior Physics.
If OP is at risk of putting up a bad MCAT however, he's better off with the SMP, I agree.
OP: Some places offer MS degrees in Human Anatomy. Several med students I know have done this and it has served them well in their preclinical training. It's something else to consider.
A 3.0 is not subaverage.... A 3.4 is subaverage, this GPA has SMP written all over it.