- Joined
- Mar 17, 2014
- Messages
- 33
- Reaction score
- 7
Which topics are ideally high yield for me to teach my medical students? Most of them won't go into IM, but maybe broad strokes will help for their shelf exam.
Which topics are ideally high yield for me to teach my medical students? Most of them won't go into IM, but maybe broad strokes will help for their shelf exam.
Students may appreciate this in the beginning, but then they end up complaining when grades come out because the residents have not had any meaningful interaction with the student to evaluate them (--> student receives average in every category). Students are also shortchanged in the end because haven't learned anything clinically useful. It's a double edged sword: students shouldn't be used for scut work (though this is hard since I know how useless we can be) but at the same time, they shouldn't be ignored either.I just send them home at the earliest opportunity.
Students may appreciate this in the beginning, but then they end up complaining when grades come out because the residents have not had any meaningful interaction with the student to evaluate them (--> student receives average in every category). Students are also shortchanged in the end because haven't learned anything clinically useful. It's a double edged sword: students shouldn't be used for scut work (though this is hard since I know how useless we can be) but at the same time, they shouldn't be ignored either.
I've yet to receive any complaints, my students have always rated me very highly. I also just mark all my students 4/5 or 5/5 entirely dependent on how we interact passing away time in the rounding room.
Honestly teaching takes time. It prolongs the already tortuously slow rounds. It's time taken away from doing all the paperwork that is the raison d'etre of internal medicine. If one of the other residents is doing handoff that means it's time out of my day that could be spent not in the hospital. If my paperwork is done and I'm just sitting around watching the clock for handoff time to come up then that's fine, but nobody's been interested enough to stick around. I sure wasn't when I was a med student.
There's nothing in my contract about teaching and my check doesn't come from the medical school so no, teaching is not my job.teaching will make you a better resident too. teaching about a case that you admitted takes 5 minutes tops. my experience when I was a med student was that I luved leaving early .... but I argue that a good resident can teach md students clinical pearls that they cannot simply pick up by reading uptodate or textbooks. also IT IS YOUR JOB.
There's nothing in my contract about teaching and my check doesn't come from the medical school so no, teaching is not my job.
There's nothing in my contract about teaching and my check doesn't come from the medical school so no, teaching is not my job.
It was understood to be an expectation of you when you took a job at an academic program.There's nothing in my contract about teaching and my check doesn't come from the medical school so no, teaching is not my job.
There's nothing in my contract about teaching and my check doesn't come from the medical school so no, teaching is not my job.
To all the folks who are a little cranky-pants, in general, interns are supposed to get the work done as efficiently as possible. Teaching is more the responsibility of the upper levels. So, this guy isn't wrong when he says it's not really his job. He's only wrong when he tries to spell "islander."
However teaching my med students the basic stuff is the best way to review it for my own purposes (usually I'm rusty prior to reviewing it before discussing with the studs). So by sending all your guinea pigs home you're doing yourself a disservice in the long run. Embrace your inner sadist!
You are at an academic institution. Your job is to learn, and also teach if you have medical students, because it is implied. Thank the lord my residents were, unlike you, interested in teaching, otherwise they would never have inspired me to enter IM as a career. Sometimes I wonder if our residency selection process for academic institutions is flawed...
If it's not spelled out in the contract that I signed then it's not part of the job. If my check came from the school then you might be able to make an argument, but nothing in the contract I signed and nothing in orientation said anything about expectations of teaching. It's not my job, period. I wouldn't have gone to medical school if all I wanted to do with my life was teach.It was understood to be an expectation of you when you took a job at an academic program.
probably not at an academic program...It was understood to be an expectation of you when you took a job at an academic program.
What I tend to do is find out what they are interested in and try to tie in the internal medicine topic to that which the student is interested in going into. For example, for students interested in surgery, we discuss blood pressure control peri operatively and post operative problems, acute kidney issues, pre operative clearance, etc.
What I tend to do is find out what they are interested in and try to tie in the internal medicine topic to that which the student is interested in going into. For example, for students interested in surgery, we discuss blood pressure control peri operatively and post operative problems, acute kidney issues, pre operative clearance, etc.
Right because if they go into surgery they're never ever going to have patients with chest pain or a GI bleed or HTN or pretty much anything you encounter in medicine right?
I don't see the point of teaching preop risk stratification because it's regardless going to be a medicine or cards consult for them (only being a little facetious).
Point is that I don't see the point of tailoring it to the interests of the student strictly. You can occasionally point it out sure but I think ultimately the point is to make them well rounded.
It's easy, consult hospital medicine to consult cardiology or GI.
If a student wants to go into surgery, they're time is better spent making the connections and studying for the shelf/step 2/whatever that's going to get them there. They're wasting time hanging out in the hospital wards.
right....i only need to learn what I am interested in. lets ignore basic chest pain work up. chest pain?? no big deal. I'll call cards
Suit yourself. Too bad the surgical services didn't think that way when I was a med student - and thankfully so, since I would never have learned basic trauma management or basics of L&D had I been told to "go home" because I wasn't interested in it as a career.
You mean two things you will never come across or be expected to deal with in internal medicine?
Right because if they go into surgery they're never ever going to have patients with chest pain or a GI bleed or HTN or pretty much anything you encounter in medicine right?
I don't see the point of teaching preop risk stratification because it's regardless going to be a medicine or cards consult for them (only being a little facetious).
Point is that I don't see the point of tailoring it to the interests of the student strictly. You can occasionally point it out sure but I think ultimately the point is to make them well rounded.
To start with, relax and calm down. If you look at the rest of what I said, you would note the letters "etc.". I do not have the time, nor the patience to list every little topic that I covered with my students while I was a resident or cover now as a fellow if they are in the ICU. If you do not see the point of tailoring anything to the students then that is your judgement call on how or if you want to teach them. This is MY style. It does not have to be your style. In my experience, tailoring the lessons to tie into what they are interested in has the effect of engaging the student and helping them learn and not just memorize. But that is MY take. If you want to drone on a lecture as dry as can be and try to keep your students awake, go right ahead.
You need to pay more attention to detail before you make snide comments like this.
You guys are arguing what to teach people when these days it's their book smarts that get them the jobs rather than clinical knowledge and wisdom. Time have changed people.