- Joined
- May 3, 2004
- Messages
- 3,410
- Reaction score
- 4,038
I saw this posted on Reddit today. It looks like it was filed in 2/20. Anybody know what the outcome of this was? It would have pretty big implications if TH lost. Pretty much any CMG I've worked for has required signature on MLP charts and billed the case under the physician NPI so they can bill 100% instead of 85% under the MLP NPI. If they lost this it would dramatically change how they bill for MLP charts where the physician has never seen the pt. I've often had an issue with this because MIPS fallouts get applied to my NPI if they miss something which I've always thought was unfair. I have less of an issue with the CC billing. The plaintiffs claim there is a CC quota mandated for the physicians and I've never had anyone require me to bill a certain CC. However, it does give me pause to make sure I'm billing for cases that qualify for CC. There was a scribe on the thread that claimed he was contacted by the FBI a few months ago to be questioned on how they chart/document for the physicians.
United States of America et al, Ex Rel. Caleb Hernandez & Jason Whaley, Relators v. Team Health Holdings, Inc. et al: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 85 MOTION to Dismiss Relators' Second Amended Complaint filed by Ameriteam Services, L.L.C., QUANTUM
United States of America et al, Ex Rel. Caleb Hernandez & Jason Whaley, Relators v. Team Health Holdings, Inc. et al: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 85 MOTION to Dismiss Relators' Second Amended Complaint filed by Ameriteam Services, L.L.C., QUANTUM PLUS, L.L.C., (d/b/a TEAMHEALTH WEST), Team...
www.docketbird.com