These are my 2 cents. Again, others may not agree with this and that is fine. I thought this might help someone out. I have interviewed at these programs or done rotations at them and have had a good grasp of them (IMHO).
University of Texas Southwestern Medical School (Austin) Program: Great city. Good 1:1 teaching by the faculty. I heard fellowships are starting soon. Funding is growing. Faculty is growing. Facilities are above par. Residents are collegial and interact well with the faculty from what I saw. Small class size, new program, lack of research, and working at multiple centers maybe a drawback. UMCB Hospital's pathology is incredible from what I've heard from the residents there. Overall this is a solid program and will likely be the program of the "future." I loved this program.
University of Texas Southwestern Medical School Program: By far the best BALANCED clinical program in Texas. City is okay to live in. Solid clinical program with good teaching and research interaction. I felt that the residents were overworked on the services. Excellent epilepsy training. Has a dynamic working with Austin. Good resident class size. Autonomy, the workload, city itself, and atmosphere of the facilities was a drawback for me.
University of Texas Medical Branch Hospitals Program: Post hurricane it is not the same as before. The chair left (and from friends I have there he was awesome!). Small program. Not enough teaching. I got more of a research feeling here than strong clinical training. Who knows if another hurricane will hit...
Methodist Hospital (Houston) Program: Small program. The Chair is world famous. I thought that the residents did not have too much autonomy. Overexposure to movement disorders and underexposure to other sub-areas. Great private hospital has is good and bad points. This maybe a good fall back program, but should not be a first choice, at least for now (IMHO).
Baylor College of Medicine Program: Another solid program. Good exposure to all areas. Movement disorders is strong. Stroke is solid. Residents are definitely overworked and looked miserable. Call schedule seems overwhelming at times. Coverage can be a pain. Chair is nice but may not be in the resident's best interest (information I get from friends there). Houston is too large of a city for me; it might be ok for others though. TMC is huge! You definitely get exposed to everything. Research can be done, but time is an issue.
University of Texas at Houston Program: Stroke, stroke, stroke. If you like strokes this is the place to be. Otherwise it is too soft in the other areas (epilepsy, pain, nm, immunology). You get the teaching, but stroke teaching eclipses it, and may actually get in the way. Research is not opposed. Residents seemed somewhat enthused and got along fine. Baylor and UT Houston and now Methodist in one area has definitely cut down the pathology into niches. Baylor looses on stroke and UT looses on movement, and don't get me started with what Methodist looses (IMHO)...
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio Program: An excellent program in a polarizing city. I believe this program to be underrated. A lot of funding, excellent resources, good teachers, coverage in all areas (epilepsy is strong). Residents seemed relaxed. Class size maybe an issue. A solid clinical program. I liked this program, but I thought the city wasn't a good fit for me. I thought there was more to do in Austin and Dallas...
Hope this helps...