- Joined
- Nov 24, 2002
- Messages
- 24,434
- Reaction score
- 17,853
I was just thinking of something tonight...
If a student was looking for the "best residency", and the sum total of their research was consulting an anonymous, subjective internet bulletin board, maybe that is evidence that the person asking the question isn't "best residency" material - after all, showing industry and resourcefulness is an hallmark of a good physician (especially an emergency physician). In that "uses system resources efficiently" is one of the core competencies, any of the shmuck lurkers that might pop up and bitch don't have a leg to stand on (for those not initiated, it is a core competency to be able to effectively use computers in your practice, along with other technology).
Now, before any zeroes get all angry, what I refer to is the antithesis of the threads started by people who've done even 2 minutes of research, and have a specific, clear question - "Why do people say that Denver and Cincinnati are the best?" or "What do you know about Wake, UNC, and Duke?" or "I've heard ___ isn't the best place". That is much more reasonable, and those get more more sincere responses (obviously).
Of course, the alternate hypothesis is that these "newbies" intentionally flame-bait, asking the blatantly repetitive, bland, open-ended questions.
If a student was looking for the "best residency", and the sum total of their research was consulting an anonymous, subjective internet bulletin board, maybe that is evidence that the person asking the question isn't "best residency" material - after all, showing industry and resourcefulness is an hallmark of a good physician (especially an emergency physician). In that "uses system resources efficiently" is one of the core competencies, any of the shmuck lurkers that might pop up and bitch don't have a leg to stand on (for those not initiated, it is a core competency to be able to effectively use computers in your practice, along with other technology).
Now, before any zeroes get all angry, what I refer to is the antithesis of the threads started by people who've done even 2 minutes of research, and have a specific, clear question - "Why do people say that Denver and Cincinnati are the best?" or "What do you know about Wake, UNC, and Duke?" or "I've heard ___ isn't the best place". That is much more reasonable, and those get more more sincere responses (obviously).
Of course, the alternate hypothesis is that these "newbies" intentionally flame-bait, asking the blatantly repetitive, bland, open-ended questions.