I mentioned it to my professors and during doctoral interviews. They all tell me not to use it and about the type of people who frequently use it.
I'll tell you who uses SDN...overachieving, well-prepared individuals who want to be adequately informed
prior to their novel experiences. Yeah, those type of people suck and are awful influences...said no one ever.
Well...Briarcliff, you said it and it's also my rule: "First rule of SDN is do not talk about SDN."
I used to talk about SDN with my colleagues in training and some of them (with particularly more OCD features than most) would say they avoided it because they would've found themselves glued to it, spending exorbitant amounts of time, and/or generally feeling temporarily dissatisfied vs satisfied, depending on the post or info garnered. I used to be worried that once I started talking (in person) about SDN (at interviews, work, classes), people would discover my online identity which is TOTALLY paranoid and a little narcissistic on my part. Overall, I now chose not to discuss SDN (in person) because I enjoy my anonymity here - I can be free to voice my opinions (right or wrong) without fear of ramifications to my program, internship or future possibilities (unlike Facebook/Instagram selfies using your real name on your account & with low security settings for all your professors/future employers/patients to see). Frankly, I like keeping my virtual world and real world separate sometimes. I haven't been on here in a while, and it seems like catching up with old friends and foes (you know who you are...you, non-psychodynamic, rigid folks...and for those folks, I'll have you know I've been doing A LOT of EBTs and CBT on internship...lovingly mixed in my psychodynamic case conceptualizations that has served me very well in building alliances for short-term treatment). Ha.
