AndyMilonakis said:
RRR stands for regular rate and rhythm...it's kind of a misnomer because "regular rate" doesn't make much sense whereas "regular rhythm" does make sense. How can a rate be regular. A rate is a rate. One of the interns I worked with several months ago commented on this and requested that I write NRRR for normal rate (as opposed to bradycardic or tachycardic) regular rhythm. Semantics semantics...it's all BS anyways.
You seem to get more days off than I do.
And now, my "I hate clinical medicine but I hate even more when people do a half assed job and pretend they aren't doing a half assed job." Now, if you are doing a half assed job and readily admit it, well then, we can do business!
I told people once about the whole RRR crap when I did medicine. I argued that RRR was pointless and showed that you were either 1) trying to fill space or 2) were ignorant. Because almost every note will have the vital signs, and as everyone knows, heart rate is a vital sign. Thus, you do not need to say it again. And especially if your vital signs say 110/60 50 16 98degrees 98% RA. You can't then say RRR. 50 is not a regular rate. It is bradycardia, fools. And no one knows what the hell a gallop is anyway. When you say gallop, are you referring to the presence of an S3? Or an S4? Or both? Or something else? Thus, Yaah's cardiac exams:
Vital signs.
Regular rhythm
Normal S1, S2 physiologically split (if necessary).
No S3, No S4.
No murmurs. No rubs.
See, now I didn't really do anything different, but it looks like I spent ten minutes listening to the patient.
Same thing with murmurs. ****ing clinical people don't know how to describe a murmur. What does "II/VI SEM" mean? Do you know what a systolic ejection murmur sounds like? Do you know the difference between a regurgitant murmur, a stenotic murmur, and/or a flow murmur? Where does it radiate? Where is it heard the best? How does it relate to S1 and S2? Why did you call it II/VI? Could you feel it?
This is why I could never be a cardiologist. I would spend an hour every day yelling at residents and students for ****ing up the cardiac exam. The other reason why I could never be a cardiologist was that none of this really matters. If you are suspicious, you get the echo. If the person has aortic stenosis bad enough to be symptomatic, the cardiac exam isn't going to tell you much you don't know. You get the echo.
The lung exam, now that's a different story. Nobody knows what the hell they're listening to anyway. Crackles, rales, decreased breath sounds, whatever. Everything can mimic everything else. Waste of time. Listen at the bases, once on each side. Then get a chest xray.