Doc Samson said in another thread how we're often the "consult of last resort." I find this to be absolutely true. It was exemplified last week while on call:
I trudge up to to the med/surg floor where we received a consult for "rule-out factitious disorder." I was at least impressed that they had come up with a semi-sophisticated diagnostic possibility. The details are the following in abbreviated format:
41 year old female; s/p bariatric surgery <1 year ago; went from nearly 400lbs to 220. Admitted to the surgical floor with complaints of gnawing abdominal pain. US negative for acute cholecyctitis (no gb wall thickening, some spitting up, no murphy's sign, etc). Initial CT abd unremarkable, done days ago.
The surgeons were under the opinion that she was med seeking, since the level of her discomfort was not commensurate with her clinical findings. Unbelievable, she has been taking 3-4 prns of dilaudid daily, on top of standing demerol for pain, with only fleeting effect. They wanted psych, I think to "write her off" as having a psychiatric issue, so that they could discharge her with a clear conscience.
My interview reveals no acute depression no major anxiety disorder, does not appear to me to be the med-seeking personality type, and the psychotic, simple phobia, malingering or otherwise personality disordered screens also largely negative.
At one point, they had put in a pediatric NG tube, since her lower esophagus is now directly connected to the antrum or thereabouts, which became clogged, so they simply removed it and kept pushing IVF.
So in short, I don't find her to be malingering, and do not find her factitious.
I asked the patient when her last BM was. She states almost a week ago.
I confirmed this with the nurses.
I checked the online rads reports. Turns out she had a KUB that morning. "Dilated colon with large stool collection. No contrast seen in the distal small intestine; no contrast seen in the distal bowel. Findings consistent with Severe bowel obstruction."
I called the surgical intern to tell him to start another NG tube and get the old disimpaction gloves ready.
Axis I: No diagnosis
Axis II: Deferred
Axis III: S/P bariatric surgery, HTN, SBO
Recommend to optimize pain control. Recommend non-opiate pain medication with discontinuation of meperidine to reduce possibility of sphincter of Oddi spasm.
Please reconsult psychiatry as necessary.
The funny part is that the surgical attending actually had the cajones to call me later and tell me that he looked at the x-ray himself later, and that it's most likely a prolonged ileus pattern, and not an obstruction per se. I nicely told him that regardless, I cannot make a psychiatric diagnosis on a patient for factitious disorder who has a documented SBO pattern on x-ray with no bowel movement in a week. I said that they really needed to take care of all possible causes for this woman's pain before they turf it to psychiatry, and that they haven't done that.
I mean, you know that radiologists are masters are not commiting to a diagnosis in their reports - understandably so. It is filled with tough calls, especially since they usually don't see the patient or have a cohesive history to go on. But this report was quite committed and left no room for interpretation.