The prescription opioid epidemic in a nutshell

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
but was he bad enough to lose his medical license? couldn't an argument be made that we need to have some docs willing to take care of these refugees? It sounds like the dea admin personally got involved in his case, and admin with no medical background.
Honestly I don't know the guy but I've come across several of his patients who were looking for someone to continue his expert high dose management plans.

I don't think there should be any argument that there needs to be docs willing to take care of someone else's mess without any impunity.
If someone can so easily ramp things up, then they should be responsible for ramping things down or providing sensible exit strategies for all parties.

Members don't see this ad.
 
Honestly I don't know the guy but I've come across several of his patients who were looking for someone to continue his expert high dose management plans.

I don't think there should be any argument that there needs to be docs willing to take care of someone else's mess without any impunity.
If someone can so easily ramp things up, then they should be responsible for ramping things down or providing sensible exit strategies for all parties.

You mean with impunity right? Otherwise, who is going to agree to participate?

How about, the local university psyche department has to run a buprenorphine clinic, and has protections.

Or, the local community hospital, with protections and/or a significant site of service differential for the services.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Honestly I don't know the guy but I've come across several of his patients who were looking for someone to continue his expert high dose management plans.

I don't think there should be any argument that there needs to be docs willing to take care of someone else's mess without any impunity.
If someone can so easily ramp things up, then they should be responsible for ramping things down or providing sensible exit strategies for all parties.

I do not know the specifics of his case (would love to hear them)

Given that:

- There are opioid refugees
- The opioid issue is very political and the DEA and others are likely emboldened to make examples out of docs
 
Members don't see this ad :)

"America’s doctors have been put in a difficult position. But it doesn’t need to be this way. It is possible to stop overprescribing yet ensure that pain sufferers get the relief they deserve."
 

"America’s doctors have been put in a difficult position. But it doesn’t need to be this way. It is possible to stop overprescribing yet ensure that pain sufferers get the relief they deserve."
That was extremely frustrating to watch and listen to.

One of the lines said that doctors are not brave enough to prescribe opioids to give their patients relief.

Even the title is infuriating. It should read "They live in constant pain, but Their Doctors Won't Help Them in the single way that the patient demands, even when that method has been shown to not work. Doctors continue to offer loads of other treatments, but they just won't help patients in that single way that just doesn't work and is extremely harmful to the patient personally, and to society as a whole. They just won't do it."
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 3 users
That was extremely frustrating to watch and listen to.

One of the lines said that doctors are not brave enough to prescribe opioids to give their patients relief.

Even the title is infuriating. It should read "They live in constant pain, but Their Doctors Won't Help Them in the single way that the patient demands, even when that method has been shown to not work. Doctors continue to offer loads of other treatments, but they just won't help patients in that single way that just doesn't work and is extremely harmful to the patient personally, and to society as a whole. They just won't do it."
I wonder if there could be a juxtaposed piece on patients with MS, EDS, etc from other countries and how they are typically managed, expectations, opinions, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
DEA is there for diversion control. One of the primary missions.


Yeah I think the DEA has a role to play — or at least somebody needs to be monitoring for bad/egregious actors. Pendulum going too far the other direction also does folks a disservice.

Seeing a family member go painfully from progressive cancer is awful. Author makes some fair points, though others are tangential and straw man-esque.

I'm still waiting for the blockbuster story: "No evidence that chronic opioid use improves MSK pain." The media's coverage of the opioid crisis actually does the public a disservice by not highlighting this. The press primarily focuses on opioid’s addiction ramifications and frequently seems to paint them as the mainstay of “pain medications” that exist etc ...but by framing opioids in that light, there's almost a tacit suggestion that *if* somebody doesn't suffer those awful side effects then they'll have finally found that thing that “really” works for their pain. When of course they’re usually just a trap.
This is low-hanging fruit and a huge story that, if well reported, could actually benefit our citizenry in a meaningful way. And it’s sitting right under their (and everybody’s) nose.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Yeah I think the DEA has a role to play — or at least somebody needs to be monitoring for bad/egregious actors. Pendulum going too far the other direction also does folks a disservice.

Seeing a family member go painfully from progressive cancer is awful. Author makes some fair points, though others are tangential and straw man-esque.

I'm still waiting for the blockbuster story: "No evidence that chronic opioid use improves MSK pain." The media's coverage of the opioid crisis actually does the public a disservice by not highlighting this. The press primarily focuses on opioid’s addiction ramifications and frequently seems to paint them as the mainstay of “pain medications” that exist etc ...but by framing opioids in that light, there's almost a tacit suggestion that *if* somebody doesn't suffer those awful side effects then they'll have finally found that thing that “really” works for their pain. When of course they’re usually just a trap.
This is low-hanging fruit and a huge story that, if well reported, could actually benefit our citizenry in a meaningful way. And it’s sitting right under their (and everybody’s) nose.

I’ve mentioned this elsewhere, but a reporter put out a call to healthcare professionals seeking stories of how government crackdowns had affected their patients’ ability to get opioids.

Since I’m so tired of the same spin on every opioid article, I wrote back with essentially what you said and offered to help. No response from the reporter.

They aren’t interested in reporting reality.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
I’ve mentioned this elsewhere, but a reporter put out a call to healthcare professionals seeking stories of how government crackdowns had affected their patients’ ability to get opioids.

Since I’m so tired of the same spin on every opioid article, I wrote back with essentially what you said and offered to help. No response from the reporter.

They aren’t interested in reporting reality.


It’s almost like a post-mortem win for Purdue et al.
 


Always fun to see folks validating these seemingly “soft” (but important) trends that most of us tend to notice. Props to these guys for putting this together.

This is pretty much the reason why the majority of my clinic visits are in the morning and last visit ends at 2p. Minimally motivated/functional patients who cannot do basic adulting need not apply
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
Top