The Worst and The Best...and the worst of your Psy.D./Ph.D. Program

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Hoodwinked

New Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
May 4, 2009
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
This is a thread for psychology doctoral students to candidly post their experiences with, initial and newly found impressions about, and suggestions for their programs. Depending on the program you've subscribed to, your voice may or may not be heard. Yet, this site has afforded doctoral students like yourself with the opportunity to intelligently express your important views for prospective students, current students, and onlooking university faculty and staff to view. Remember, you are anonymous to readers and posters - and your opinions matter!
 
Last edited:
It's unfortunate, but true. This Clinical Psychology Program employs professors who solely teach required courses/seminars/labs within the program and who are also clinical supervisors in multiple community organizations in the pool of available practicum/internship agencies. As we all know, not all professors are ethical or professional clinical supervisors, and not all clinical supervisors are ethical or professional professors.

A prominent problem in these particular Clinical Psychology programs is that when students have been treated unethically and/or unprofessionaly as an intern, they may indeed need to enroll in the same professor's class(es) throughout their program, as there are no other professor options for many required units. Needless to say, a formal complaint by a doctoral student is usually swept under the rug, as program faculty have long-standing relationships with one another. And, we are all aware of what generally happens when one disrupts the equilibrium of the system. So, the student may be left feeling disconnected, unsupported, hypervigilant, or disenchanted with the program they spend a large amount of money for.

When applying to practicum/internships within this institution, or when canvassing the community/state for Psychology Doctoral Programs, it is important to be PROACTIVE in protecting yourself and your career (nobody else will, not even those you pay to do so) - 1) apply to practicum/internship agencies whose staff are not professors within your university, and 2) apply to doctoral programs who do not utilyze the dual-roled professor-supervisor. Take home message - "It would never happen to me" is a myth.
 
That was a well stated...and well needed position. I agree on the grounds that cronyism exists and is prolific in AIU. The mechanisms of change are slow to move because any dissent represents personal involvement from the professors at hand. That is, when professors are part of a system that provides them with menial compensation for their services they are less than willing to change their way of doing things, since change requires effort and effort requires motivation,which...AIU professors are not brimming over with. So your plight is part of a larger failing system, which makes it much more difficult to change.

I wonder if this would be different in a research style university though? In that system the student has virtually no power whatsoever, since they are paid and employed. As our system is flawed on one hand I wonder if it's the lesser of two evils?

I think it was Winston Churchill who said
"Democracy is the worst form of government except for all those others that have been tried"

I digress. Moreover, I agree with your assertion that AIU represents a defunk system wrought with injustices. It is bland in delivery of services, adjunctive, and it's core faculty are so removed from direct and daily interaction with their students that it seems difficult to find mentorship.

Take those things into account and students, when faced with the dilemas you've mentioned, are hardly able to find sound counsel or satisfactory ammends.
 
Top