"...Therefore, we do not interview DO's."

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Ok, so chief resident is not as tactful as he/she could be. But he has a point, aside from the flaming.

DOs who think that they can do an osteo degree and then get allopathic residencies ARE taking the back door, as chief pointed out. And while there are some DOs who are brilliant and have excellent resumes, it seems like the majority of them did the DO route because they could not get into the MD route. And if that is the case, then why should they be treated equally?

What I was trying to say earlier is that if you go into DO knowing what the focus is, then you will not be disappointed when all you can get is a primary care residency. If you go into DO thinking that it is the easier way of being a doctor and don't want to bother with getting the MD, then you will be outraged when programs "discriminate" against you. Really, if you want to be an allopathic doctor, then go to an allopathic medical school.

This is not an MD vs DO war. It is realizing what your degree means and what you are trained to do. Suppose a nurse practitioner came on here and complained about discrimination because he couldn't get an allo residency. We would all say, well, you should have gone to medical school. That's not MD vs nurse, that's reality.
 
robotsonic said:
Ok, so chief resident is not as tactful as he/she could be. But he has a point, aside from the flaming.

DOs who think that they can do an osteo degree and then get allopathic residencies ARE taking the back door, as chief pointed out. And while there are some DOs who are brilliant and have excellent resumes, it seems like the majority of them did the DO route because they could not get into the MD route. And if that is the case, then why should they be treated equally?

What I was trying to say earlier is that if you go into DO knowing what the focus is, then you will not be disappointed when all you can get is a primary care residency. If you go into DO thinking that it is the easier way of being a doctor and don't want to bother with getting the MD, then you will be outraged when programs "discriminate" against you. Really, if you want to be an allopathic doctor, then go to an allopathic medical school.

This is not an MD vs DO war. It is realizing what your degree means and what you are trained to do. Suppose a nurse practitioner came on here and complained about discrimination because he couldn't get an allo residency. We would all say, well, you should have gone to medical school. That's not MD vs nurse, that's reality.

They probably know what you're saying is true, but they don't want to accept or acknowledge it.
 
I met many do's on the interview circuit as most programs carib grads like myself in with the same pool as DO's. The US allo grads that interviewed with us were basically bottom of the barrel which is pretty much what i expected. On avg. the allo grads that I interviewed with were scoring 50 points lower(!) on step 1 then i had. Thats the penalty that PD's give to non us and non allo grads. When I was a medicine intern I participated in the interview process and my PD ranked EVERY US allo applicant (many with mutliple failed classes, multiple step attemtps, a few with documented discipline issues) over the best of the best carib grads (many with 95+ both steps and great lor's), and they didnt even bother interviewing DO's. Whether you want to face it or not a large percentage of DO's went to their schools looking for a backdoor into the match and simply settled for the stigma of carrying a DO instead of a degree from some 3rd world dump. I think the OP either fell for the DO sales brochure or simply made the mistake of believing what the school admins were telling him.

In any case good luck with the match.. there are alot of gems buried beneath the top tier programs and hopefully you will find a place that makes you happy.
 
Can we all agree that there are two main accrediting bodies when it comes to GME? The ACGME and the AOA. Lets say a hospital or physician group in Happy, Texas wants to start a training program in Dermatology. The Dermatology dept. is made up of 10 physicians (9 MDs, 1 DO). Since they are mostly MDs are wish to include everyone (MDs and DOs alike) they are going to seek accreditation from the ACGME and the ADA. Based on this how the HELL do you figure MDs/Allopaths own the residency. So why not seek dual approval from the AOA/ACGME? Too many hoops to jump through w/ the AOA. Besides why bother when ACGME accreditted program is inclusive to MDs and DOs. Plus those dudes running the AOA are nuts I'll admit that. The same would apply if it was 10 DOs seeking AOA approval only, except in this case they wish to includes DOs only. Unfair yes, but they probably have a chip on their shoulder from all the allo PDs that wouldn't give them the time of day. Can you blame them for not wanting to include MDs? Now obviously this scenario only holds for community programs w/o med school sponsorship which invariably dictates the accreditation they seek. The good thing is that more and more programs are becoming dually accredited (Even MD school programs) albeit primary care programs (at least I am happy) which will likely be the only programs I apply to so you self righteous pricks (only intended to those complaining) will stop bitching about how we stole your spots. The the right to interview and rank should be up to the Residency program. Its obvious that many dept chairs/PDs think that having a DO resident will make their program appear less competitive to ignorant med students that don't realize that there are those that chose to attend an osteopathic school for reasons other than not gaining acceptance into an MD school. Hard to believe but it happens. Flame on.
 
Fantasy Sports said:
And DOs aren't trained in EBM or as well in molecular basis of disease, so what?

Response to EBM
Crap... You mean I took that epidemiology, Biostats, and EBM test for nothing.

Response to molecular basis of dz
Again, crap... I guess I can stop reading Robbin's. Someon better tell the mighty Goljan this at OSU.
 
Chief Resident said:
If DOs don't let MDs into their residencies why should we let DOs into ours?

Dude, were you beaten or molested by a DO when you were a child or something. Whats with all the hostility towards DOs? You never have anything remotely nice to say.
 
robotsonic said:
Ok, so chief resident is not as tactful as he/she could be. But he has a point, aside from the flaming.

DOs who think that they can do an osteo degree and then get allopathic residencies ARE taking the back door, as chief pointed out. And while there are some DOs who are brilliant and have excellent resumes, it seems like the majority of them did the DO route because they could not get into the MD route. And if that is the case, then why should they be treated equally?

What I was trying to say earlier is that if you go into DO knowing what the focus is, then you will not be disappointed when all you can get is a primary care residency. If you go into DO thinking that it is the easier way of being a doctor and don't want to bother with getting the MD, then you will be outraged when programs "discriminate" against you. Really, if you want to be an allopathic doctor, then go to an allopathic medical school.

This is not an MD vs DO war. It is realizing what your degree means and what you are trained to do. Suppose a nurse practitioner came on here and complained about discrimination because he couldn't get an allo residency. We would all say, well, you should have gone to medical school. That's not MD vs nurse, that's reality.


Do you really believe in the crap comming out of your mouth? Do you honestly believe that an allopathic medical school is harder than an osteopathic school?

Seriously!!! What is with the holier than though complex here.
 
MODERATOR...can we PLEASE stop this rediculous BS!!!

This is OBVIOUSLY gone far away from the OPs reasoning for starting this thread, and has become an MD v. DO thing (again)
 
Shodddy18 said:
Do you really believe in the crap comming out of your mouth? Do you honestly believe that an allopathic medical school is harder than an osteopathic school?

Seriously!!! What is with the holier than though complex here.

I don't know whether osteopathic school is harder than allopathic school. My point was that it is easier to get into osteopathic school.

There is no holier than thou complex. I know that I am not the smartest or the hardest working medical student in my class. I accept that and I also accept the limitations that go along with it. If you sign up for a DO then you should understand the limitations that go with that. And honestly, we all know that DO often means the person could not get into an allopathic school in the U.S. When I was applying for medical school I did not even consider a DO school, because I knew I could get into a competitive allopathic school. I'm guessing that most of the DO students would have gone to MD schools if they could have.
 
Idiopathic said:
So, between all the fluff, Chief Resident really has some insight.

"When I finish residency I want a job as a doctor where I will work 40 hours a week (9-5 schedule), not work on the weekends, have no call, and not be responsible for teaching residents/med students or having anything to do with research. Is FP best suited for this?"

Thanks for keeping the allo profession pure for the rest of us. Also, I guess at that allo school of yours they teach you that CABG's are done by cardiologists? Sweet. Score one for cardio 🙄

Ill put my resume/credentials (as well as those of several colleagues) up against yours any day, so dont bring that weak-ass **** in here.


You know the residency issues dont bother me, but what is bothering me is this whole having to give up my seat in the front of the bus when a US MD climbs aboard. Seriously... Grow the Funk up. 👎
 
robotsonic said:
I don't know whether osteopathic school is harder than allopathic school. My point was that it is easier to get into osteopathic school.

There is no holier than thou complex. I know that I am not the smartest or the hardest working medical student in my class. I accept that and I also accept the limitations that go along with it. If you sign up for a DO then you should understand the limitations that go with that. And honestly, we all know that DO often means the person could not get into an allopathic school in the U.S. When I was applying for medical school I did not even consider a DO school, because I knew I could get into a competitive allopathic school. I'm guessing that most of the DO students would have gone to MD schools if they could have.

ok, so I guess I'll throw my hat in the ring as well...

let's start off by asking this question: WHAT is the difference in getting accepted into an allo v. osteo program...GPA?, MCAT?...ok...how 'bout this...I'll give you both....SO, we are looking at a person who, for WHATEVER reason, DIDN'T get in into an allo school...maybe they were rushing a fraternity and had really bad semester, maybe there were other things going on in life, maybe they were not good in physics--which WE ALL know HOW MUCH we used in EVERYDAY medicine 🙄 , maybe they are the "non-traditional" student, and oh yes...maybe...just maybe they WANTED to go to a DO school--KINDA LIKE ME, who was accepted into MCV, Rush, AND Finch but decided to go to where I am now since I TRULY like the place and felt VERY comfortable here (and it's the school that had the JD component as well, which was an added bonus 👍 )

so now that we've established that the differecne b/w student A who goes to allo v. student B who goes to osteo is the "lower" (see below) GPA and MCAT that student B has, for whatever reason (see above)...now, let's analyze how the education is easier or harder....it is often said that the hardest part of medicine is GETTING into medical school....now, maybe I am wrong in this, but I AGREE with it....if you think about, an acute pancreatitis is gonna be an acute pancreatitis no matter if you learn it in Harvard, Penn, PCOM, NYCOM, UMDNJ, Ross, St. Georges, India, China, Pakistan, Israel, well...I thikn you get the picture.... :laugh: POINT: schools are NOT easier or harder than each other (remember, there is a COUNCIL that oversees edumacation and has standards set forth). We often "swap" tests w/ other schools "allo and osteo" here so we have more study material....I guess the allo students "must" be *****s for doing something w/ an osteo school, right 🙄 ....EDUCATION is EDUCATION....acute pancreatitis is acute pancreatitis.....

case in point, just came back from a sub-I @ a VERY PRESTIGIOUS US institution...when we all sat there (myself and other students from that institution) to discuss a case, a particular disease process, or whatever, there were some questions that I got right and some that I got wrong, and there were some questions that others got right as well as wrong....the point: INITIALS AFTER YOUR FRIGGIN' NAME MEANS ABSOLUTE S**T....HOW GOOD OF A FUTURE PHYSCICIAN IS ALL THAT IT'S ABOUT!!!! There are good DOs and bad DOs, as there are good MDs and bad MDs....

it's a shame that the bad DOs give the rest of us a bad name, and its a shame that the bad MDs "get away with it" since they have the "MD" after their name....BUT THAT IS LIFE!!! :idea: :idea: :idea:


FYI: whether you choose to believe me or not in this (which I really am NOT gonna lose sleep over if you don't), here are my "LOW" GPA and MCAT scores to get admittied to "only an osteopathic school" 😀 🙄 :

3.69 bio major w/ psych minor from U.Penn
MCAT: 31 (12 bio, 10 phy, 9 verbal)
 
medlaw06 said:
3.69 bio major w/ psych minor from U.Penn
MCAT: 31 (12 bio, 10 phy, 9 verbal)
You might want to consider bringing your verbal up if you want to practice medicine in the US....
 
robotsonic said:
Ok, so chief resident is not as tactful as he/she could be. But he has a point, aside from the flaming.

DOs who think that they can do an osteo degree and then get allopathic residencies ARE taking the back door, as chief pointed out. And while there are some DOs who are brilliant and have excellent resumes, it seems like the majority of them did the DO route because they could not get into the MD route. And if that is the case, then why should they be treated equally?

What I was trying to say earlier is that if you go into DO knowing what the focus is, then you will not be disappointed when all you can get is a primary care residency. If you go into DO thinking that it is the easier way of being a doctor and don't want to bother with getting the MD, then you will be outraged when programs "discriminate" against you. Really, if you want to be an allopathic doctor, then go to an allopathic medical school.

This is not an MD vs DO war. It is realizing what your degree means and what you are trained to do. Suppose a nurse practitioner came on here and complained about discrimination because he couldn't get an allo residency. We would all say, well, you should have gone to medical school. That's not MD vs nurse, that's reality.

ok...so paragraph by paragraph...

1) the "back door" issue: c'mon....do you REALLY pride youself in thinking that you are THAT much "superior" than a DO? In other words, your "back door" comment quite reasonably implies that you think DOs are trying to "compensate" for their apparent lack of the prestigious "MD" initials by going into an allopathic residency...now, I would think this is just a LITTLE bit rediculous, don't you? don't mean to start a war here, b/c to be honest, all this is rediculous. But, that doesn't mean that I am gonna sit here w/ a pacifist approach either....anyways, and how exactly is it a "back door" which also implies that it is "easier" to get into than the "front door." I would also say that it is HARDER for DOs to get allo spots than MDs (duh!! 🙄 :idea: ) and MAYBE a little easier than FMGs (some places prefer FMGs than DOs since they still have the "MD")...so, in essence, it's NOT a back door in the easy sense, and neither is it a back door in that "nepoleonic-I-wish-I-were-an-MD-but-since-I-am-not-I-think-I'll-try-to-get-an-allopathic-MD-residency-so-I-can-feel-good-about-myself" issue either....sorry to disappoint you, robot 😉...and 1 more thing....a DO going to an MD residency won't "magically" be able to become the MD and will STILL be the DO...just doing his/her training @ an MD institution...

2) Go to an allopathic school: COULDN'T AGREE WITH YOU ANYMORE, BROTHA'!!!!!! If you are truly gonna be "ashamed" at wriiting "DO" after your name, then robot is ABSOLUTELY correct....go to the MD school!!!! Be happy with yourself!!!

3) What your degree means: Ok?...this was interesting...so what do YOU think the "DO" means....do you think that we should just sit there and crack necks and backs all day?....do you think we should be out in the boonies of Arkansas (apologies to anyone from AK here 🙂 ) and deliver babies in the pale moonlight....or does that mean that we should see our patients and chant "Om" with them until their illnesses magically go away....no need for a exorcisim though...THAT would be crazy! :laugh: :laugh: Don't mean to sound harsh, but just tryin' to get an understanding of what YOUR opinion of the "DO" actually means....I guess ALL THAT TIME I spent learning about pathology, OB, surg, peds, medicine, etc etc was SUCH a waste of time since I can ONLY use my DO to do the aforementioned things anyways. :laugh: 😀

Just a chess game!!
 
Megalofyia said:
You might want to consider bringing your verbal up if you want to practice medicine in the US....


i hab bery bery bhad gremmier bhich is bhy i do no gud in vurbaal! :laugh: :laugh:
 
medlaw06 said:
i hab bery bery bhad gremmier bhich is bhy i do no gud in vurbaal! :laugh: :laugh:
Ah.. that explains all! Your forgiven.. continue on..
 
Idiopathic said:
Boy I really have to get my school's curriculum committee to get rid of our biostatistics, biochem, micro, pathology, and EBM courses. Thanks for letting me know that we dont get trained in this!

Awesome.

MD and DO school are both 4 years. You guys learn OMT, we learn other things obviously. Whether that is more in depth pathology, physiology, diagnosis, etc I dont know nor do I care. The fact of the matter is while you guys are doing OMT we are doing something else. That something else makes us different enough that whatever lame excuse you use to let yourself compete for MD slots but not allow us to get DO spots is bullcrap and you know it.

And I love how no one responded to the rest of my post, I guess you agree completely that DOs have become so hypersensitized to not having an MD that they are acting like spoiled children wanting to get into MD residencies as equals but not allowing us to get into DO residencies as well.

Frankly, there is not a single good reason for MD programs to accept a DO as long as DOs arrogantly refuse to return the favor. So don't act as if allopaths owe you anything as long as you keep barring us from your residencies (but then laughably threatening to sue us for discrimination for not considering you for some programs, when you won't consider us for ANY) and as long as you keep spewing this "oh we treat the whole patient with OMT" nonsense.

Either we are equals or not, so pick. In either case, just stop being so arrogant and greedy. You chose to go to DO school, so don't act surprised that once you leave this magical fairyworld of SDN where DO=MD if the real world is different and shows are called House MD instead of House DO because no one would know what the latter show would be about. And frankly, as long as people keep spouting this "whole patient" bullcrap and denying MDs the right to get into the competitive DO specialties (derm, ortho, etc), don't expect to be treated any better either.
 
The fact of the matter is while you guys are doing OMT we are doing something else. That something else makes us different enough that whatever lame excuse you use to let yourself compete for MD slots but not allow us to get DO spots is bullcrap and you know it.

Okay, I am going to play 😀 . First of all, we do not learn OMT over something else that MD may be learning. We learn OMT on top of eveything else that MDs learn. Second off, a good friend of mine from a MD school came to visit me and realized that we both learn the same things except DOs also have to learn OMT. I am not saying one is better than the other just wanted to clear that little misunderstanding on your part.

Something to ponder on, my friend also told me at her MD program there was a student there that started off in the class of 2005. Failed 1st year, repeated it. Then failed 2nd year was able to repeat it. Last she heard the person was now in the class of 2007, or maybe even in the class of 2008. At my school 3 strikes and you are out. No ifs, ands, or buts. Like I said just something to ponder on.
 
Shodddy18 said:
You never have anything remotely nice to say.

The truth isn't always nice when it comes to this topic.
 
I am not up for getting involved in a pissing contest but I do have a question for my MD colleagues. What do you guys think of a DO student who performs well on USMLE, outperforming many of the MD students?. Would you prefer to be working with a student/Dr. with inferior board scores just because he is an allopath ? Do you think DO students who perform well on your board exam deserve a shot aty allopathic residencies ? I agree MD students should be allowed a shot at DO residences - it is only fair. But the AOA, in it's inifnite wisdom, will never let that happen, much like they will never support the combined match.

Good luck to everyone - MD and DO - with interviews and boards this season !

Chris

PS I am a DO who will be joining the allopathic ranks in IM. I am excited to work with both the MDs and DOs. I would hope that everyone would judge what kind of Dr/student I am based on my abilites rather than the initials on my jacket. Just my 02
 
Fantasy Sports said:
So does that mean MDs can sue to get into DO derm residencies too? Denying us that right is pure discrimation! Why not just put all us MDs in reservations while you are at it, since you are denying us this fundamental freedom! 🙄

NO it doesn't. I think MD's should be considered for DO slots. The problem is that MD's technically aren't qualified. The only difference between a strictly DO program (many are joint AMA and AOA and thus accept both), is that it was specifec osteopathic manipulative medicine requirements. Since MD's are not trained or certified to do manipulation they can not fulfill the requirements needed for the residency and thus it is not discrimination.

That being said, I firmly believe that if an MD were to take courses and get certified in manipulation I see no reason why they shouldn't be allowed to persue a strictly DO residency.
 
Fantasy Sports said:
And DOs aren't trained in EBM or as well in molecular basis of disease, so what?


Ummm...that is flat out wrong. Dont' want to be mean, but DO's are definitely taught EBM and to utilize it. I don't know where you got the idea that they aren't.

I would agree with you though that most DO schools do not train as deeply in molecular basis of disease (hard core histology, biochem, etc.) because most are not research based institutions, they are there to train physcians, not necessarily researchers, but their are sereral MD schools that do likewise. MD schools hit some core science things harder not because it will make you a better physician but because it will make you a better researcher.
 
Fantasy Sports said:
And I love how no one responded to the rest of my post, I guess you agree completely that DOs have become so hypersensitized to not having an MD that they are acting like spoiled children wanting to get into MD residencies as equals but not allowing us to get into DO residencies as well.

Read my other response to DO's not allowing MD's.

The real reason why....there are not enought DO residencies. Over half of all DO's do ACGME residencies and it isn't because they prefer those. It has to do with numbers. There are only enough DO residencies to fill about 50-60% of graduating DO's. Since it is easier to get accredited by the ACGME and since the ACGME allows both, their is no need for AOA certification and those many programs don't follow though with getting both.

I think the AOA's stupid policy of forcing one to take a DO residency if they match to one also effects the numbers. I have looked at many residency programs. My first choice is to return to Texas and several of the programs I like, including my first choice just happen to be ACGME or dually accredited. If I apply to DO programs and get accepted to one (say the 6th on my list) I will be forced to take that spot even if my number 1 or 2 spot (one ACGME and one dual accredited) except me. Because of this I chose not to even apply to the AOA programs and many of my friends made the same decision.

Incidentally I had very competitive scores coming out of college and chose to go to a DO school for several reasons. True my top school which I did not get into was an AMA program, but it was not my top school because of that...I just liked the program and the location. (Incidentally I was later granted admission on a rolling basis for the following year but was already a semester thourgh school).

My goal was to be a doctor, I could really care less wether it was an MD or DO. In the Army programs they don't even distinguish between them, your just a physician.
 
Flea girl said:
Okay, I am going to play 😀 . First of all, we do not learn OMT over something else that MD may be learning. We learn OMT on top of eveything else that MDs learn. Second off, a good friend of mine from a MD school came to visit me and realized that we both learn the same things except DOs also have to learn OMT. I am not saying one is better than the other just wanted to clear that little misunderstanding on your part.

This is exactly the arrogance of DOs I have been talking about the whole time. "We don't treat the disease we treat the whole patient" "We learn OMT on top of eveything else that MDs learn" That is so cocky it's not even funny. To say you learn OMT on top of everything else MDs learn in the same 4 year span obviously means you believe you learn more (as if we sit on our hands while you are learning OMT). That is downright insulting, and probably another myth propagated by the AOA.

Obviously you don't do everything an MD does plus OMT, because if that was true you wouldn't be performing so poorly compared to MDs on USMLE exams. But of course, your natural response to this difference is that "We aren't trained for that test, we take our own test" Well, then its not true that you do everything an MD does + OMT now is it? The only way that score difference exists is because 1) our curricula are different, and thus a DO shouldn't be able to get into an MD residency the same way MDs aren't allowed into DO residencies because of OMT or 2) DOs are dumber. I will imagine that most people would pick the former as the most logical and politically correct explanation.

It's really frustrating hearing such arrogance. And whether you realize it or not, it breeds more resentment than you can imagine.

So feel free to keep saying these things to your MD colleagues, but don't expect much sympathy from us when you want to get into our residency programs and are discriminated against. Because the way DOs act towards MDs, you guys shouldn't even be allowed in our programs as long as you keep barring us from yours.

And I dont care about the shortage or AOA residency spots, that's not the point. The point is, are DOs and MDs equal or not? If we are, then both our residency programs should be open to free competition. If we are unequal, then we should keep our programs seperate as in the status quo, but bar DOs from MD residencies to return the favor.
 
Chief Resident said:
If you have a DO degree then the rest of your "resume/credentials" are moot against an MD degree.

Yo Chief,

HOW ARE YOU FEELING ABOUT YOURSELF THESE DAYS???

Thought so. Get some counselling bro, you could be so much happier.
 
So I scheduled a SICU rotation at the Institution X the other day, not anticipating the swift rejection from the surgery department. But today I decided to cancel the SICU rotation and do it at another place, so I had to call the Anesthesia department to cancel it.

I told the secretary I talked to the other day that I had to cancel and the reason why, and even told her about the email that my good bud Harry sent back to me and she goes "Wow, really? That's weird. It's weird because our program director is a DO and we have lots of DO residents, and my family doctor is a DO and I just think they are the greatest in the world!" She told me I should come and do anesthesia there. 😀

I realize surgery still has a lot of issues with women and DO's, and hopefully that will change someday.

I still plan on getting back to Harry.

Oh and btw.....time to quit arguing MD vs DO. Take it back to the pre Allo and pre Osteo forums guys.
 
DrMaryC said:
So I scheduled a SICU rotation at the Institution X the other day, not anticipating the swift rejection from the surgery department. But today I decided to cancel the SICU rotation and do it at another place, so I had to call the Anesthesia department to cancel it.

I told the secretary I talked to the other day that I had to cancel and the reason why, and even told her about the email that my good bud Harry sent back to me and she goes "Wow, really? That's weird. It's weird because our program director is a DO and we have lots of DO residents, and my family doctor is a DO and I just think they are the greatest in the world!" She told me I should come and do anesthesia there. 😀

I realize surgery still has a lot of issues with women and DO's, and hopefully that will change someday.

I still plan on getting back to Harry.

Oh and btw.....time to quit arguing MD vs DO. Take it back to the pre Allo and pre Osteo forums guys.


Hi DrMary, let me know what happens with your application. If they already HAVE DO residents, (do they in the surgery dept?) why would they say that they can't offer you an interview? Do you think maybe it was there lame way of denying you an interview in general?

And to the people on this board that are being immature, you know who you are- just get over it, you are NOT going to change what is already here (MD's, DO's and IMG's), learn to work with eachother for Pete's sake and LEARN SOME RESPECT FOR YOUR COLLEAGUES its shameful... seriously

and yes, I'm an MD US grad, but who REALLY CARES? My patients don't, isn't that what you all should be worried about? WHAT YOUR PATIENT WORRIES ABOUT? :idea:
 
Fantasy Sports said:
This is exactly the arrogance of DOs I have been talking about the whole time. "We don't treat the disease we treat the whole patient" "We learn OMT on top of eveything else that MDs learn" That is so cocky it's not even funny. To say you learn OMT on top of everything else MDs learn in the same 4 year span obviously means you believe you learn more (as if we sit on our hands while you are learning OMT). That is downright insulting, and probably another myth propagated by the AOA.

Obviously you don't do everything an MD does plus OMT, because if that was true you wouldn't be performing so poorly compared to MDs on USMLE exams. But of course, your natural response to this difference is that "We aren't trained for that test, we take our own test" Well, then its not true that you do everything an MD does + OMT now is it? The only way that score difference exists is because 1) our curricula are different, and thus a DO shouldn't be able to get into an MD residency the same way MDs aren't allowed into DO residencies because of OMT or 2) DOs are dumber. I will imagine that most people would pick the former as the most logical and politically correct explanation.

It's really frustrating hearing such arrogance. And whether you realize it or not, it breeds more resentment than you can imagine.

So feel free to keep saying these things to your MD colleagues, but don't expect much sympathy from us when you want to get into our residency programs and are discriminated against. Because the way DOs act towards MDs, you guys shouldn't even be allowed in our programs as long as you keep barring us from yours.

And I dont care about the shortage or AOA residency spots, that's not the point. The point is, are DOs and MDs equal or not? If we are, then both our residency programs should be open to free competition. If we are unequal, then we should keep our programs seperate as in the status quo, but bar DOs from MD residencies to return the favor.


Calm down BOY!!! I did Not say that in an arrogant manner! You are the one with the bone to pick. You were the one that started the attack. I personally think that Texdrake already addressed the reason why MDs can not apply to the DOs residency. Me I could care less. Frankly, I think that is all should be combined. By the way what year are you in?
 
JakeHarley said:
Yo Chief,

HOW ARE YOU FEELING ABOUT YOURSELF THESE DAYS???

I'm feeling great, thanks for asking. How are you?
 
The root of this problem is DOs assuming they should be treated the same as MDs when they are not MDs. Last I heard the DO degree isn't even recognized in other countries.
 
Chief Resident said:
Giving up already? I was just beginning to take you and your "resume" apart. Come back when your feelings aren't hurt. 🙂
Loser
 
Chief Resident said:
The root of this problem is DOs assuming they should be treated the same as MDs when they are not MDs. Last I heard the DO degree isn't even recognized in other countries.
Loooooooooooser!
 
Chief Resident said:
The root of this problem is DOs assuming they should be treated the same as MDs when they are not MDs. Last I heard the DO degree isn't even recognized in other countries.
Hi my name is chief resident, I try to make myself feel better by cutting down D.O.'s. Cutting down D.O.'s cant make up for your problems, do you need to talk to someone. Sounds like your really insecure!!!!!!!
 
allendo said:
Hi my name is chief resident, I try to make myself feel better by cutting down D.O.'s.

Your name is allendo.
 
Chief Resident said:
The root of this problem is DOs assuming they should be treated the same as MDs when they are not MDs. Last I heard the DO degree isn't even recognized in other countries.

I guess it is also a problem that I assume I should be treated like white people when I am not white. Last I heard blacks are not treated fairly in many other countries. Don't you have a anti-DO/IMG clan meeting to attend.
 
Wow, this is a great thread. Patient care is obviously #1 on a lot of peoples list. Also, the MD primary care programs need us DOs, because pre-Madonna MD students won't touch those programs. So, they won't be shutting us out any time soon. Good luck trolling Fantasy and Chief, you guys must have rewarding lives.
 
raptor5 said:
I guess it is also a problem that I assume I should be treated like white people when I am not white. Last I heard blacks are not treated fairly in many other countries. Don't you have a anti-DO/IMG clan meeting to attend.

Nice, trying to play the irrelevent race card.
 
I've seen numerous patients state that they could careless if someone is a DO, MD, PA, whatever as long as they are knowledgeable and compassionate. Only people that argue MD vs DO and give a flying f are MD's that feel for some reason superior when actually they suck ass and patients hate them....or DO's that are insecure and have a chip on their shoulder. My man chief resident falls into to 1st category......
 
Chief Resident said:
Nice, trying to play the irrelevent race card.
Oh so now your not just an idiot your a racist! Rally starting to impress me here, but what can I expect where bull there is $hit. Hey chief are you going to get the moderater after me?
 
tool said:
I've seen numerous patients state that they could careless if someone is a DO, MD, PA, whatever as long as they are knowledgeable and compassionate. Only people that argue MD vs DO and give a flying f are MD's that feel for some reason superior when actually they suck ass and patients hate them....or DO's that are insecure and have a chip on their shoulder. My man chief resident falls into to 1st category......
I don't have a chip on my shoulder I just can't stand people like Chief rectum.
 
tool said:
I've seen numerous patients state that they could careless if someone is a DO, MD, PA, whatever as long as they are knowledgeable and compassionate. Only people that argue MD vs DO and give a flying f are MD's that feel for some reason superior when actually they suck ass and patients hate them....or DO's that are insecure and have a chip on their shoulder. My man chief resident falls into to 1st category......

It's not my problem if you don't like the truth about the limitations with being a DO. Nobody forced you to get that degree and you should've been aware of the potential problems of getting a residency as a DO beforehand instead of complaining now and expecting to be treated like an MD.
 
Chief Resident said:
It's not my problem if you don't like the truth about the limitations with being a DO. Nobody forced you to get that degree and you should've been aware of the potential problems of getting a residency as a DO beforehand instead of complaining now and expecting to be treated like an MD.
What limitations?
 
Chief Resident said:
Try reading this thread.
I think you live in a box and think that everyone wants to be a neurosurgeon or a cardiologist(false) Everyone does not want to be in the most competetive specialties.
 
Sure there are programs that for various reasons don't interview DOs, but that doesn't shut DOs out of any specialties.



Since this thread has degenerated, I'm going to close it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top