those that are reading Stars path review.

[HiddenTruth]

---

Members do not see this ad.

So, I have been using Stars and BRS. Most chapters in stars are better, but BRS still emphasizes somethings stars doesn't. Anyways, so I've beent aking ntoes into Stars or BRS (for certain ch taht are better in tehre), but it's takeing FOREVER. I am spending almost an entire day trying to mem. each chapter and doing this (but my path is also weak to begin with). I was wondering, if any of you who are reading Stars, have suggestions as to maybe, certain chapters that are straight up better in one book or the other so i don't waste the time writing down each little thing. I am upto kindey--so if any of the chapters after that (kidn/male, female, bone, cns, endo--i think) are better in one or the oher, holler! Thanks a lot.

 

[Wrigleyville]

You think you have it bad -- I'm all but transcribing Stars into my notebook to help me learn it. That book is great, but I can't convince my friends that it's any good because it's from 1998.

 

[Long Dong]

I read stars first following along with what is covered in class. The weekend before finals I read BRS path and only underline the things that I haven't seen in the stars book, and then I take those underlined things from brs and add those notes to my stars book. If I did it the other way around I think it would take up way to much time.

 

[the_equalizer]

I read a chapter out of stars, asI went through it I'd mark up the relevant section in brs. I'd basically skim the paragraph or couple of lines or whatever on a topic in brs, then read that part in stars, then put maybe a note or two in the BRS from stars. when I review now, I'm just going to read brs.

this only applies for the chaps where I actually read stars already, for those that I didn't I may just skim it and rely on BRS. time is of the essence, and I'm blowing it like crazy