9
I just did a napkin calculation, and the total amount we reimburse for biomedical science instructors during years 1 and 2 comes out to just over 0.4% of our total operating budget.
Tim Cook’s salary is less than one percent of Apple’s value, though, so what is this statistic telling us?
Tim Cook’s salary is less than one percent of Apple’s value, though, so what is this statistic telling us?
A broken clock, as they say... 😉
But apple doesn’t spend $1,200 making an iPhone and then sell it for $1,000.
Medical schools spend more than tuition.
You may call it what you will. Go to an area without primary care physicians, and the people of that area will tell you they have a shortage of physicians not a distribution problem; further, there is no doubt that the numbers show that the workforce of physicians is - and is foretasted to be - way outweighed by the population age and growth. If you want to dispute that I encourage to go read just one of the hundreds of peer reviewed articles on the subject.What you posted has nothing to do with creating a primary care shortage. You have no idea how the process works. We don't have a shortage, we have a distribution problem, hence why NPs are able to push legislators to expand their practice scope under the pretense of "we will fill the shortage!" (hint: they don't practice in needed areas any more than doctors do).
None of this changes the fact it is not a shortage, the problem is distribution. Many places have over-saturation. In fact, I'll admit that yes there are specific fields that really do have a shortage but they aren't the ones you would think, ie vascular surgery. However, as a whole? We have a distribution problem, not a shortage problem.Go to an area without primary care physicians, and the people of that area will tell you they have a shortage of physicians not a distribution problem; further, there is no doubt that the numbers show that the workforce of physicians is - and is foretasted to be - way outweighed by the population age and growth. If you want to dispute that I encourage to go read just one of the hundreds of peer reviewed articles on the subject.
Second, if accepting more and more hyper-intelligent students that want to specialize to boost school stats and increase board scores does NOT also add in any aspect to the "physician distribution" issue that we are having, I would love to hear what is.
Ok, to highlight how you have no idea how this works let's analyze this quote you made beforeBecause, I also mentioned the pay compared to the cost and interest of medical school, but according to you, nothing that I said has anything to do with creating this issue nor do I have any idea what is going on.
WHY go into primary care and make some of the least amount of pay when you can pick a specialty and make 3 times more? Especially since medical school prices have skyrocketed and interest rates are so high. They wouldn’t and do not; which now creates a primary care shortage and thus a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Wow, yikes. But all the resources I used in preclinical pretty much amount to 1) some classroom space for small groups, 2) the faculty leading those small groups, and 3) two white coats and a stethy.I just did a napkin calculation, and the total amount we reimburse for biomedical science instructors during years 1 and 2 comes out to just over 0.4% of our total operating budget.
Wow, yikes. But all the resources I used in preclinical pretty much amount to 1) some classroom space for small groups, 2) the faculty leading those small groups, and 3) two white coats and a stethy.
You made me realize with this sage post that in this thread (and that dumpster fire of a thread on the preclinical years) that people were suffering from a particular malady. It has a name:Whether you realized it or not, at various points along the road you utilized the admissions office, the financial aid office, academic affairs, student affairs, the assessment/evaluation office, the anatomy lab, information technology, the library, numerous software systems, accounting, legal, HR, and all the associated faculty, administrators, support staff, and equipment that comes with those offices/departments/divisions. Without all those components, a medical school in this day and age cannot fulfill its basic functions.
Pretty funny to think that at smaller med schools, there's probably more people supporting the infrastructure than there are medical students.Whether you realized it or not, at various points along the road you utilized the admissions office, the financial aid office, academic affairs, student affairs, the assessment/evaluation office, the anatomy lab, information technology, the library, numerous software systems, accounting, legal, HR, and all the associated faculty, administrators, support staff, and equipment that comes with those offices/departments/divisions. Without all those components, a medical school in this day and age cannot fulfill its basic functions.
That's pretty much my understanding of what they use it for.Also what do universities use their multibillion endowments for, if not their infrastructure and employee salaries? Does it all just get reinvested?
Mine comes from the class of 198X as do most of my peers, really it's that they not only charge us instead of using endowment, they rope in the alumni to spare their endowment funds too.That's pretty much my understanding of what they use it for.
Also, it's used for student support. Where do you think that scholarship money comes from?