- Joined
- Oct 23, 2010
- Messages
- 44
- Reaction score
- 1
I've been reading up on the threads about this book but keep getting mixed thoughts.
Some say it's a good content review with rigorous FL's, and others say it sucks.
After studying with this book for the past few weeks, I am starting to feel more and more uncomfortable with it.
My apartmentmate is currently studying with the Princeton Review books, but she seems to have the Hyperlearning series, which appears COMPLETELY different from mine. I feel uneasy because the material review in my book ("Cracking the MCAT") just glosses over a lot of the content and I don't think I'm being fully prepared. I've also caught a few factual errors and typos. After reading every chapter, I'm still left with a lot of questions, and the Hyperlearning book seems a lot more detailed and thorough.
Which is more appropriate for MCAT preparation?
The introduction of my "Cracking" book claims that the book "fully prepares" you for the MCAT (lol but I guess I shouldn't just take their word for it?). Is this because the MCAT doesn't go very indepth into anything? Does the Hyperlearning series simply overprepare you for the MCAT?
Or is the Cracking book inadequate? Should I consider switching to another book?
Some say it's a good content review with rigorous FL's, and others say it sucks.
After studying with this book for the past few weeks, I am starting to feel more and more uncomfortable with it.
My apartmentmate is currently studying with the Princeton Review books, but she seems to have the Hyperlearning series, which appears COMPLETELY different from mine. I feel uneasy because the material review in my book ("Cracking the MCAT") just glosses over a lot of the content and I don't think I'm being fully prepared. I've also caught a few factual errors and typos. After reading every chapter, I'm still left with a lot of questions, and the Hyperlearning book seems a lot more detailed and thorough.
Which is more appropriate for MCAT preparation?
The introduction of my "Cracking" book claims that the book "fully prepares" you for the MCAT (lol but I guess I shouldn't just take their word for it?). Is this because the MCAT doesn't go very indepth into anything? Does the Hyperlearning series simply overprepare you for the MCAT?
Or is the Cracking book inadequate? Should I consider switching to another book?