- Joined
- Aug 7, 2015
- Messages
- 1,148
- Reaction score
- 859
Soooo I took my second Achiever test and I just hate this program lolol.
Okay I know people say it's a bit harder than the DAT but honestly I'm wondering why some thought it was good practice?
I honestly find the sciences just as useless as Crack DAT Science. Their PAT is so unclear...keyholes aren't hard you just can't see the slopes in most cases. Is that the case with the real DAT?
Math is okay I think it's the only okay subject in my opinion.
Reading....should I even go there haha?
What do you guys think? Anyone who took the test recently and used Acheiver? Or someone who is using achiever?
(I know the polls show Achiever is a few points lower than the real test but I suppose I'm asking how did you guys use Achiever to study? Because I don't find it useless right now. Also is Topscore the same as DAT Achiever or is it a better software?)
Okay I know people say it's a bit harder than the DAT but honestly I'm wondering why some thought it was good practice?
I honestly find the sciences just as useless as Crack DAT Science. Their PAT is so unclear...keyholes aren't hard you just can't see the slopes in most cases. Is that the case with the real DAT?
Math is okay I think it's the only okay subject in my opinion.
Reading....should I even go there haha?
What do you guys think? Anyone who took the test recently and used Acheiver? Or someone who is using achiever?
(I know the polls show Achiever is a few points lower than the real test but I suppose I'm asking how did you guys use Achiever to study? Because I don't find it useless right now. Also is Topscore the same as DAT Achiever or is it a better software?)