- Joined
- Jul 3, 2006
- Messages
- 146
- Reaction score
- 0
I recently read this article and was wondering what everyone else thought about this.
http://www.aafp.org/online/en/home/publications/news/news-now/resident-student-focus/20060920moretraining.html
I have long been a proponent of lengthening the FM training period to four or even five years. At least for full spectrum FM. I think the time has come for FM to split up into full spectrum FM and limited FM. Limited could consist of basically IM and Peds type stuff with the same three years of training that we currently have. Full spectrum could be lengthened to four years and keep OB training or even five years and expand some of the surgical training. With a four year curriculum, we could require that full spectrum FM include C-section skills and post-partum BTL skills. If we went to five years, we could include more training in things like endoscopy and simple surgeries like appy's and chole's as requirements. What does everyone else think?
http://www.aafp.org/online/en/home/publications/news/news-now/resident-student-focus/20060920moretraining.html
I have long been a proponent of lengthening the FM training period to four or even five years. At least for full spectrum FM. I think the time has come for FM to split up into full spectrum FM and limited FM. Limited could consist of basically IM and Peds type stuff with the same three years of training that we currently have. Full spectrum could be lengthened to four years and keep OB training or even five years and expand some of the surgical training. With a four year curriculum, we could require that full spectrum FM include C-section skills and post-partum BTL skills. If we went to five years, we could include more training in things like endoscopy and simple surgeries like appy's and chole's as requirements. What does everyone else think?