- Joined
- Jul 2, 2013
- Messages
- 11,511
- Reaction score
- 15,396
Yes, notes are shorter for chronic, stable patients.
I also trained where clinic attendings loved novels. Although it's important to start with lengthy notes then learn how to trim the fat, I suspect our attendings wanted long notes to allay their own anxieties and because they didn't have a grip on all the patients seen by all the residents in a day.
The way your example is written, are you trying to convey your patient is worsening and could be drifting toward suicide in light of severe stressors of losing a parent? If they were to OD and fall asleep and not wake up, it wouldn't be hard to get a hired academic gunslinger to testify you missed all the red flags and should have done more.
On the other hand, are you trying to convey that the patient is experiencing normal sadness and anxiety related to an ailing parent? Like this:
I've had similar attendings and while I appreciate the details as an attending now, I don't expect a novel. As I said, I wouldn't have any issues with OA's example as it conveys some thought as to context of symptoms. But without context we may as well-just be receptionists checking boxes. I could shorten my example further to say:
"worsening depression over the past 4-6 weeks, patient attributes this to parent's declining health. Feelings of hopelessness regarding situation. Now having problems initiating sleep d/t racing thoughts, significant fatigue. Reports some apathy toward living but denies thoughts of actively harming or killing self."
To the bolded, I'm trying to put the patient's "SI" into context. Just saying "passive SI" is kind of like just saying "depressed". If someone just wants to convey that SI isn't active and that patient doesn't have thoughts of directly killing themselves, that's fine. It doesn't give me any context of their thoughts though. Are these thoughts of wishing they were dead? Wishing they just didn't exist? Apathy towards life? Those are often not equal scenarios and speak to different constructs of depression which may lend themselves towards specific treatments.
I didn't really talk about how I'd approach that treatment either, as if I felt they were "drifting toward suicide" we'd be directly talking about that and it would be discussed in the assessment/plan. I was just talking about how I'd document the HPI so others could understand the situation a little better than "depressed patient meeting MDD criteria". For aspects like mania or disorganized psychosis those details are less relevant, but to anxiety and depression where the etiology of that particular symptom can vary so significantly that context is important. I'm also not too concerned about someone testifying against me, my OCPD traits come out pretty aggressively in my assessment and plan portions of patients that are actual risk concerns, lol.