Titrations & Buffers

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

kmcgrath

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2009
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Solution A contains a buffer formed of 2.0M acetic acid and 0.8M potassium acetate. Solution B contains a buffer formed of 0.2M acetic acid and 0.08M potassium acetate. How do the solutions compare?

A) The pH and buffer of both solutions are the same
B) The pH of solution A is lower than that of solution B, but the buffer capacity is the same
C) The pH of solution A is the same as the pH of solution B, but solution A has a greater buffer capacity
D) The pH of solution A has a greater buffer capacity than solution B

Which is the correct answer and what is your reasoning behind it. Please be thorough. Thank you!😕
 
Solution A contains a buffer formed of 2.0M acetic acid and 0.8M potassium acetate. Solution B contains a buffer formed of 0.2M acetic acid and 0.08M potassium acetate. How do the solutions compare?

A) The pH and buffer of both solutions are the same
B) The pH of solution A is lower than that of solution B, but the buffer capacity is the same
C) The pH of solution A is the same as the pH of solution B, but solution A has a greater buffer capacity
D) The pH of solution A has a greater buffer capacity than solution B

Which is the correct answer and what is your reasoning behind it. Please be thorough. Thank you!😕

This is funny....I see now...nevermind...wasn't reading closely *slap on wrist* I should be more careful when I am reading
 
I could swear that is D because for B the conc. of acetate is 10 X lower than in A and so since the Henderson-Hasselbalch eqn has a log fxn, the pH of the buffer become smaller for B than A. D seems to be the only answer that has the pH of A greater than B.Am I right? Thanks Berkeley review i love Acids, bases and buffers.
 
I would guess (not really) C...Both share the same pH (when you work out the entire problem), but differ in buffer capacity where solution A is greater in that regard.
 
Okay I have another question. I answered this one below B but the correct answer is A. Why?

860. The Ka1 for H2CO3 is 4.3x10^-7. The Ka2 for H2CO3 is 5.6x10^-11. Which of the following depends upon the concentration of acid and conjugate base?
A) The pH of the first equivalence point
B) The pH of the first half equivalence point
C) The pH of the second half equivalence point
D) The pKa1

I was thinking that the 1st half eq. point (B) would be 50% H2CO3 and 50% HCO3-; therefore, the pH=pKa at this location and indeed depends on the concentration of the acid and its conjugate. No? Hmm... I dunno...help please?
 
How do they have the same pH if one has more acid than the other??

According to Hen-Ha equation, pH = pKa + log([base]/[acid]), the pH of a buffer depends only on the pKa of the acid and the ratio of conjugate base to acid. Since both ratios are essentially the same ([base]/[acid] = 0.8/2.0 = 0.08/0.2), the log of each will be the same, and given by the Hen-Ha equation above, will have the same pH. Additionally, since solution A has a greater acid concentration, this just indicates that it can also absorb a greater amount of (or has a greater capacity to absorb) base or acid.
 
How do they have the same pH if one has more acid than the other??

I had the same question myself until I rewrote the question on the forum...soon to realize that I was reading the problem wrong. Let me know if I need to explain it another way.
 
I had the same question myself until I rewrote the question on the forum...soon to realize that I was reading the problem wrong. Let me know if I need to explain it another way.
Oh gawd that was my bad. What an effing mistake on my part.I DIDN"T READ THE VALUES CAREFULLY. The ratio of [base]/[acid] is the same in both circumstances and so the pH should be the same.
 
I had the same question myself until I rewrote the question on the forum...soon to realize that I was reading the problem wrong. Let me know if I need to explain it another way.


B/c the question says buffer there's an equal amount of the weak base and acid in both cases so the ph=pKa???
 
Okay I have another question. I answered this one below B but the correct answer is A. Why?

860. The Ka1 for H2CO3 is 4.3x10^-7. The Ka2 for H2CO3 is 5.6x10^-11. Which of the following depends upon the concentration of acid and conjugate base?
A) The pH of the first equivalence point
B) The pH of the first half equivalence point
C) The pH of the second half equivalence point
D) The pKa1

I was thinking that the 1st half eq. point (B) would be 50% H2CO3 and 50% HCO3-; therefore, the pH=pKa at this location and indeed depends on the concentration of the acid and its conjugate. No? Hmm... I dunno...help please?

i don't know if i'm right on this, but i would think since at 1st half-equiv pH=pKa then that is the case where the concentration of acid/conj. base *doesn't* matter because it's not part of the eqn, whereas with the 1st equivalence point, the amount of acid/conj. base you have will directly factor into the Hen-Hass eqn

is that right?

p.s. i originally thought it was B and most likely would've picked that if I didn't explicitly see that you said the correct answer was A
 
The pH of a buffer equals the pKa at the half equivalence point. It does not matter how much acid or base you have, the pH at the half equivalence points will always the same.

Say I start out with two sets of solutions, one containing 1 M phosphoric acid in its fully protonated state, and one containing .1 M phosphoric acid, also fully protonated. Ok, I start adding NaOH to both solutions. At some point, I'll get to the first half equivalence point. When I get there, the pH will equal the first pKa, so it will be 2.16. Ok, I keep titrating, until I get to the first equivalence point. At this point, the first solution will have approximately 1 M monobasic phosphate (H2PO4 2-) and basically no other form of phosphate (this is assuming that the NaOH added no volume to the solution. Obviously this wouldn't be the case, but it works either way, this just simplifies the math). The second solution will have approximately 0.1 M H2PO4(2-). If you calculate the pH of the 1 M solution at this point, you should be somewhere around 3.60. The pH of the .1M solution should be closer to 4.10. Thus, this is where the pH actually depends on the actual concentration of the species, as opposed to the relative concentration of the species (pKa and thus the half equivalence points depend on the relative concentration of the acid and conjugate base, not the actual concentration). If you keep titrating till the second half-equivalence point, you're now at the second pKa, so your pH is 7.21 for both solutions.

So that's why the answer is A
 
Okay I have another question. I answered this one below B but the correct answer is A. Why?

860. The Ka1 for H2CO3 is 4.3x10^-7. The Ka2 for H2CO3 is 5.6x10^-11. Which of the following depends upon the concentration of acid and conjugate base?
A) The pH of the first equivalence point
B) The pH of the first half equivalence point
C) The pH of the second half equivalence point
D) The pKa1

I was thinking that the 1st half eq. point (B) would be 50% H2CO3 and 50% HCO3-; therefore, the pH=pKa at this location and indeed depends on the concentration of the acid and its conjugate. No? Hmm... I dunno...help please?

Where did you get this question? You might want to check the source of this question and see if they have corrected their error in a later edition, because there is no correct answer in the choices. What they have presented can actually lead to a HUGE misunderstanding of the subject. Some typos are obvious, and all books have them. But this is a case where the author doesn't really know what they are presenting. I hate to toss out such a strong comment and mean to pick no argument here (afterall, we all make mistakes), but this can prove to be very damaging to not only acid-base chemistry but also protein chemistry and the isolectric point. What they have in essence said with their wrong answer implies that the isoelectric point depends on the concentration of the zwitterion, which it definitely does not. You might want to use a better set of materials for acid-base chemistry or at the very least consult a chemist whenever you are told something is wrong that you don't fully understand.

The pH of a buffer equals the pKa at the half equivalence point. It does not matter how much acid or base you have, the pH at the half equivalence points will always the same.

Very true... so keep that in mind for pKa1, pKa2, and pKa3 in your example, because that will help clear up a misconception.

Say I start out with two sets of solutions, one containing 1 M phosphoric acid in its fully protonated state, and one containing .1 M phosphoric acid, also fully protonated. Ok, I start adding NaOH to both solutions. At some point, I'll get to the first half equivalence point. When I get there, the pH will equal the first pKa, so it will be 2.16.

Right on the mark to this point.

Ok, I keep titrating, until I get to the first equivalence point. At this point, the first solution will have approximately 1 M monobasic phosphate (H2PO4 2-) and basically no other form of phosphate (this is assuming that the NaOH added no volume to the solution. Obviously this wouldn't be the case, but it works either way, this just simplifies the math). The second solution will have approximately 0.1 M H2PO4(2-). If you calculate the pH of the 1 M solution at this point, you should be somewhere around 3.60. The pH of the .1M solution should be closer to 4.10. Thus, this is where the pH actually depends on the actual concentration of the species, as opposed to the relative concentration of the species (pKa and thus the half equivalence points depend on the relative concentration of the acid and conjugate base, not the actual concentration). If you keep titrating till the second half-equivalence point, you're now at the second pKa, so your pH is 7.21 for both solutions.

Just want to toss a correction into your thought process here. With polyprotic acids, and most commonly with amino acids, you determine the middle equivalence points by averaging the adjacent pKa values. This is what we do to ascertain the isoelectric point for amino acids, because of the symmetry of the polyprotic titration curve. The technique for attaining isoelectric point is based on a generic aspect of a polyprotic titration curve, which shows that the middle equivalence points lie perfectly displaced between the adjacent pKa values.

So, in your example comparing 1.0 M H3PO4 to 0.10 M H3PO4, the two curves will share the same pKa1, first equiv pt., pKa2, second equiv pt. and pKa3. They will differ according to concetration only at the start and the last equivalence point.

If you find this counterintuitive based on what you have proposed above about concentration, then ask yourself what the pH will be after 1.5 equivalents of base have been added. As you stated above, in both curves you expect the pH = pKa2. That would mean that in both curves, the first equiv. pt. would lie halfway between pKa1 (about 2.1) and pKa2 (about 7.2), resulting in a pH of roughly 4.65. Drawing the curves overlayed onto one another should help to make this more apparent.
 
Last edited:
Okay I have another question. I answered this one below B but the correct answer is A. Why?

860. The Ka1 for H2CO3 is 4.3x10^-7. The Ka2 for H2CO3 is 5.6x10^-11. Which of the following depends upon the concentration of acid and conjugate base?
A) The pH of the first equivalence point
B) The pH of the first half equivalence point
C) The pH of the second half equivalence point
D) The pKa1

I was thinking that the 1st half eq. point (B) would be 50% H2CO3 and 50% HCO3-; therefore, the pH=pKa at this location and indeed depends on the concentration of the acid and its conjugate. No? Hmm... I dunno...help please?

I think this is a question about both the H.H. equation and the concentration of the different ions in solution. Only the pH of equivalence points are dependent on the log of base/acid. At the half equiv point the concentration of the base/acid are equal making the log(base/acid) = log(1) = 0, anywhere outside this point the concentrations of acid/base are necessary to determine the pH. pka1 is the pH at the half equiv point, so no need for the concentrations of the acid/base. Here's and explanation from wiki:
In monoprotic acids, the point halfway between the beginning of the curve (before any titrant has been added) and the equivalence point is significant: at that point, the concentrations of the two species (the acid and conjugate base) are equal. Therefore, the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation can be solved in this manner:


5d91d139a60e7c7ec84dbdb2d7aeec0a.png


2f0bfb3facc004bf9fbecef5b709522f.png



a2f8fdbb869214704abab4a07eb34783.png
 
Last edited:
I think this is a question about both the H.H. equation and the concentration of the different ions in solution. Only the pH of equivalence points are dependent on the log of base/acid. At the half equiv point the concentration of the base/acid are equal making the log(base/acid) = log(1) = 0, anywhere outside this point the concentrations of acid/base are necessary to determine the pH. pka1 is the pH at the half equiv point, so no need for the concentrations of the acid/base.

You need to be really careful with what you've just stated. The HH equation only applies when the [base] is reasonably close to the [acid]. At the equivalence point of a titration curve, you CANNOT use the HH equation, because the solution is predominantly the conjugate species. You have to solve it like a regular solution of the conjugate compound in water at the new concentration (concentration at equivalence following the dilution associated with titration).

  • And I cannot emphasize this enough: Just like with isolelectric points, the pH at a middle equivalence point on a polyprotic titration curve does not depend on concentration; it is an average of the two surrounding pKa values.

The orginal question has a HUGE error and there is no correct answer, so please stop trying to answer it; that just adds to potential confusion for future readers.
 
One of the main uses of the HH equation is to calculate pH of a buffer solution which by definition contains significant amounts of both the acid and the conjugate base (hence the buffering capacity).

The equivalence point of a titration, on the other hand, is by definition the point at which only one of those species exist. So naturally, the HH equation can't be applied (neither in the practical sense nor in the mathematical sense).
 
So, in your example comparing 1.0 M H3PO4 to 0.10 M H3PO4, the two curves will share the same pKa1, first equiv pt., pKa2, second equiv pt. and pKa3. They will differ according to concetration only at the start and the last equivalence point.

I don't get this. Why would the start and last equivalence points be different?

Why did you include the first equiv pt. in your list of numbers the two curves will share?

Since pH deals with hydrogen ion concentration, wouldn't the hydrogen ion concentration, at least at the equivalence points, always be different.

H3PO4 -> H+ + H2PO4-

So at the first equivalence point, when the above reaction has gone to completion, the hydrogen ion concentration for the 1.0M H3PO4 would be 1, giving a pH of 0?, while the Hydrogen ion concentration for the 0.1M H3PO4 would be 0.1 giving a pH of 1?

I realize this does not make any sense at all, because the pH at the equivalence point should be greater than the pH at the half-equivalence point, but I do not see where I am going wrong.

Basically, I am asking how to go about finding the pH at the equivalence points, I think???
 
Last edited:
Still looking for the answer to the above question.

Any help would be extremely appreciated, maybe from BerkReviewTeach who made the original post, or anyone else who knows about titrations.
 
I don't get this. Why would the start and last equivalence points be different?

Why did you include the first equiv pt. in your list of numbers the two curves will share?

Since pH deals with hydrogen ion concentration, wouldn't the hydrogen ion concentration, at least at the equivalence points, always be different.

H3PO4 -> H+ + H2PO4-

So at the first equivalence point, when the above reaction has gone to completion, the hydrogen ion concentration for the 1.0M H3PO4 would be 1, giving a pH of 0?, while the Hydrogen ion concentration for the 0.1M H3PO4 would be 0.1 giving a pH of 1?

I realize this does not make any sense at all, because the pH at the equivalence point should be greater than the pH at the half-equivalence point, but I do not see where I am going wrong.

Basically, I am asking how to go about finding the pH at the equivalence points, I think???

Wow, I wish I could help you, but I totally agree, that is confusing. I thought I understood this, but I guess not.
 
Why did you include the first equiv pt. in your list of numbers the two curves will share? Since pH deals with hydrogen ion concentration, wouldn't the hydrogen ion concentration, at least at the equivalence points, always be different.

H3PO4 -> H+ + H2PO4-

So at the first equivalence point, when the above reaction has gone to completion, the hydrogen ion concentration for the 1.0M H3PO4 would be 1, giving a pH of 0?, while the Hydrogen ion concentration for the 0.1M H3PO4 would be 0.1 giving a pH of 1?

I realize this does not make any sense at all, because the pH at the equivalence point should be greater than the pH at the half-equivalence point, but I do not see where I am going wrong.

Basically, I am asking how to go about finding the pH at the equivalence points, I think???

At the first equivalence point, the H+ you mention in your approach has been completely consummed by base. The difference between the two curves is that the amount of base necessary to reach the first equivalence will be ten times greater in the 1.0 M case than the 0.1 M case. So if you think about it from the base perspective, the pH for the 1.0 M H3PO4 curve will climb more when adding a 1.0 M NaOH than the 0.1 M H3PO4 will climb when adding 0.10 M NaOH. But I don't feel that clarifies things. Consider the following:

  • 10 mL 1.0 M H3PO4 + 5 mL 1.0 M NaOH (half an equivalent) will form a solution after reaction that has half H3PO4 and half H2PO4-, resulting in the pH = pKa1.

versus

  • 10 mL 0.1 M H3PO4 + 5 mL 0.1 M NaOH (half an equivalent) will form a solution after reaction that has half H3PO4 and half H2PO4-, again resulting in the pH = pKa1.

Now consider the following pair:

  • 10 mL 1.0 M H3PO4 + 15 mL 1.0 M NaOH (one and a half equivalents) will form a solution after reaction that has half H2PO4- and half HPO42-, resulting in the pH = pKa2.

versus

  • 10 mL 0.1 M H3PO4 + 15 mL 0.1 M NaOH (one and a half equivalents) will form a solution after reaction that has half H2PO4- and half HPO42-, again resulting in the pH = pKa2.

You've already agreed that these two points are identical for both curves. Here's the weird thing to wrap your head around that once you do, it will all fit.

The first equivalence point is midway between pKa1 and pKa2. If both curves share identical pH = pKa1 and pH = pKa2 points, then both curves have to share identical midway points between the two. In other words, they share the same first equivalence point. The concentration makes no difference to the pH; but it does impact how much base you need to get there.

Perhaps the following picture overlapping two titration curves for the same diprotic acid of different concentrations will help.



Note that the middle of each curve overlaps. Weird to accept at first, but it works this way. And again, you should notice that this is exactly what we do when determining the isoelectric point in biochemistry.

And back to the OP, where did you get that question?
 
WOW Thanks BerkReviewTeach, that was awesome.

One additional question though.

You say it changes the amount of base you need to get there. By that, do you mean the amount in moles, because I understand that. However, if you mean the amount in mL, that does not make sense to me, especially considering the example you had.

Also, I understand the trick that equivalence point is always between the two pKas, but is there a way to solve for this mathematically, perhaps using your example?
 
Top