Last edited:
Get off your high horse?So I go to Northeastern University, and we have 6 month co-op programs that you can go on if you choose to, to do whatever you like be it volunteering or work experience. I currently have my EMT license and for my next co-op I cannot decide what to do. I have 4 options, and all you have to do is pick which option you think would appeal to medical schools best and why:
1. I could work for an ambulance service (paid)
2. I could work in a hospital ER as a technician (paid)
3. I could volunteer abroad in Costa Rica for 6 months as an EMT (unpaid)
4. I could volunteer abroad in Costa Rica for 4 months as an EMT, and Peru for 2 months as a technician in a clinic (unpaid)
There are pros and cons for each of them: consider importance of clinical experience, of volunteering, of improving my Spanish which would appeal to them. The only differentiating faction between #3 and #4 would be, do you think they would prefer I got to know one place better? Or would they prefer I had a more eclectic view of the central/south American health care systems?
I am focusing mostly on the high end medical schools.
Thanks for your opinions!
Jay
Get off your high horse?
I would choose option 1 or 2. But if you can work where you live, why not do the EMT thing AND volunteer?
Do whatever YOU want to do most. None of those options is a poor use of your time. Presumably you got your EMT cert to practice patient care (it's not a very intellectually stimulating job from what I've heard), so using this as your motivation do what you think would benefit you most personally. Then when it comes time to applying to schools, all you need to do is have confidence and sell yourself, because you feel like you should be a doctor.
And on the EMT note, it is a lot more in depth then one might think. There are hundreds of different scenarios to learn, and yes it is mostly get them in and drive fast, however one must be able to adapt very quickly to each individual patient, with a fewer amount of toys then the ER gets!