I've worked in 3 labs for extended periods of time and I am listing each experience separately on my primary. For most of my EC's I used short, simple bullet points but for research experiences I've written more in paragraph form. Basically, I've included things I would say if I were to explain what I do in my lab to any science person: what I'm doing, why I'm doing it, basic theory/hypothesis of experiments, results and lastly (for med school admissions purposes) what I've gotten from the experience.
Thats all great but I realize that including so much info may screw me at interviews because if they ask, "So tell me about X research. What did you do?", I'm basically going to regurgitate what I wrote on my primary. Is that a problem? Am I going to come across as not knowing what I'm doing if I do this because they expect some info other than what is listed on my primary? Obviously, I've gotten more than a few sentences worth of material to talk about but what I've listed really is the meat of my experience.
Basically, is there any value in leaving out some info on my primary so I can bring up something not listed on my primary at interviews?
Thats all great but I realize that including so much info may screw me at interviews because if they ask, "So tell me about X research. What did you do?", I'm basically going to regurgitate what I wrote on my primary. Is that a problem? Am I going to come across as not knowing what I'm doing if I do this because they expect some info other than what is listed on my primary? Obviously, I've gotten more than a few sentences worth of material to talk about but what I've listed really is the meat of my experience.
Basically, is there any value in leaving out some info on my primary so I can bring up something not listed on my primary at interviews?