Took DAT yday

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

desiyaar

Full Member
10+ Year Member
5+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2008
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
Points
0
  1. Pre-Dental
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
20/23, AA/PAT
Engineering GPA above the avg. for the following schools.....

Want to apply to Columbia, UCSF, UCLA, Loma Linda, and some others.
Adequate scores? Thanks!
 
23 on PAT? thats really good

what would you recommend to study for that section?
 
To be honest, i studied for the science, math portions but was doing ok with the PAT to begin with, but i did do some practice with the kaplan online tests and DAT achiever. DAT achiever is much harder than real DAT but if u can do those then u will be fine on the PAT. As for the top, front end views, use a book on Drafting/CAD and it will teach u about the orthographic projections.
 
To be honest, i studied for the science, math portions but was doing ok with the PAT to begin with, but i did do some practice with the kaplan online tests and DAT achiever. DAT achiever is much harder than real DAT but if u can do those then u will be fine on the PAT. As for the top, front end views, use a book on Drafting/CAD and it will teach u about the orthographic projections.

nice score. Do you remember your RC topics?
 
20/23, AA/PAT
Engineering GPA above the avg. for the following schools.....

Want to apply to Columbia, UCSF, UCLA, Loma Linda, and some others.
Adequate scores? Thanks!

TO the OP ONLY...
phod daala PAT mein...mast yaar....
scores acche hai.....kaun si engineering major hai....TS kaisa hai??
 
Great job. How detailed were the bio questions on the exam and what did you do to rock for the RC. Did you get any tone questions or just find the word and answer?
 
Nice.

These are my favorite questions
Was O-chem simple (like simple reactions?)
How long were the RC essays?
Did QR have those very hard problem solving Qs?

That is a lot of questions
sorry
Thanks
 
QR was tougher than usual mainly bc of timing....PAT achiever scores for me were around 18 or 19, as those seemed much harder than actual DAT. RC was long as usual, id say more difficult than the achiever ones. As for ochem, it was much more simple than achiever and similar to kaplan. I think the DAT is very random in what questions one ends up getting, main thing i can say for all subjects is just do practice problems and dont read much......
 
Top Bottom