- Joined
- May 29, 2004
- Messages
- 31
- Reaction score
- 0
So, I believe there were probably several things about my application this cycle that hurt me (I applied really late in the cycle, I don't have too much clinical experience, my MCAT is only slightly above average) but I think what hurt me the worst was how late I applied. One of the reasons I applied so late was that I kept belaboring my personal statement, foolishly devoting most of August and September towards editing the thing. When I submitted it, however, I felt like it was perfect, down to the word. Now that I'm reapplying, though, should I scrap it and start again?
I got interviews at all the Texas schools to which I applied, but I've been waitlisted at the ones I was really hoping for (Southwestern and Baylor)... And interviewers seemed to like my PS, because most seemed to comment on something each had liked about it. My PS tries to show the origin of my motivation for medicine and healthcare, and what I've done as a result of recognizing that motivation -- so it's difficult for me to see how I might rewrite something that essentially hasn't changed over the years.
Do most people totally change their PS upon reapplication though? And does anyone think that seems like an artificial, repackaging of one's self, done only for the sake of emphasizing that one is not slacking off by using something old? I mean, it seems like the best written PS should stand on its own, as a reflection of the applicant, and shouldn't have to be changed when you reapply ... after all, I won't change my personality when I get reinterviewed -- that's going to stay the same. But maybe I only feel this way because I am trying to reapply without having had a chance to strengthen my application much, and I'm acknowledging the only difference in my case is when in the cycle I am applying... thoughts?
I got interviews at all the Texas schools to which I applied, but I've been waitlisted at the ones I was really hoping for (Southwestern and Baylor)... And interviewers seemed to like my PS, because most seemed to comment on something each had liked about it. My PS tries to show the origin of my motivation for medicine and healthcare, and what I've done as a result of recognizing that motivation -- so it's difficult for me to see how I might rewrite something that essentially hasn't changed over the years.
Do most people totally change their PS upon reapplication though? And does anyone think that seems like an artificial, repackaging of one's self, done only for the sake of emphasizing that one is not slacking off by using something old? I mean, it seems like the best written PS should stand on its own, as a reflection of the applicant, and shouldn't have to be changed when you reapply ... after all, I won't change my personality when I get reinterviewed -- that's going to stay the same. But maybe I only feel this way because I am trying to reapply without having had a chance to strengthen my application much, and I'm acknowledging the only difference in my case is when in the cycle I am applying... thoughts?